Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski (1595-1640)" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
De-Clawing the Christian Horace: The Suppression of Sarbievius’ Roman Catholicism by His British Translators
Autorzy:
Kraszewski, Charles S.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/951838.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Fundacja Naukowa Katolików Eschaton
Tematy:
Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski (1595-1640)
Matthias Casimirus Sarbievius (1595-1640)
Motiejus Kazimieras Sarbievijus (1595-1640)
Casimir Britannicus (1595-1640) Mathias Casimirus Sarbiewski (1595-1640)
Sarbievius (1595-1640)
Casimir (1595-1640)
Baroque poetry
Catholic poetry
Jesuit poetry
Hils George (17th century)
Translation Theory
Baroque
Polska
Baroque England
Opis:
The thesis of the article is as follows: Sarbiewski (Sarbievius), a Jesuit priest and neo-Latin poet, was arguably the most visible and influential neo-Latin poet of Baroque Europe. Widely published throughout Europe, he was also translated into many vulgar tongues, including English. The one published translation into English which takes most account of the widest range of Sarbiewski’s work is Odes of Casimir by G. Hils. Given the anti-Catholic animus obtaining in England at the time, it is striking that the works of a Jesuit priest could pass the government imprimatur. The article proves that, in order to do this, Hils resorted not only to completely masking the Catholic, not to say Jesuit, character of the author (palpable in the poems themselves), but also masking his traces by, in some instances, revising the Latin originals printed side by side with the translations. In so doing, Hils not only shows himself to be a cavalier translator, he shows himself to be a dishonest editor who does violence to another author’s intellectual property. The author of the article used a comparative method (comparing the translations to the originals) as well as explications de texte (close readings) of both the original Latin, and translated English, poems. Main results: A cogent comparison of translations based on concrete examples, which also has ramifications for the ethics of translation in general. The results are limited to one translator. It would be interesting to see if such “masking” of the author was carried out on a wider scale in Baroque Britain. Practical implications of the article. The results of the analysis can be applied to practical didactics: i.e. the teaching of British literature, Polish literature, neo-Latin literature or literature in general; they also might lie in the area of translation theory, cultural transfer, and the ethics of translation/interpretation. Social implications of the article: The rights (or lack thereof) of translators to heavily skew the texts they are interested in, so as to make their work more acceptable to the powers that be, or more reflective of their own concerns and beliefs. The novelty of the article resides in the fact that until now no one has conducted a thorough evaluation of Hils’ work. Up until now, their “quality” has been unquestioned; this article proves just how faulty they are.
Źródło:
Religious and Sacred Poetry: An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education; 2014, 1(5); 61-78
2299-9922
Pojawia się w:
Religious and Sacred Poetry: An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Between Romanticism and the Baroque – Władysław Syrokomla as a translator of Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski’s poetry: Theory and practice
Między romantyzmem a barokiem. Władysław Syrokomla jako tłumacz poezji Sarbiewskiego – teoria i praktyka
Autorzy:
Buszewicz, Elwira
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2088449.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the 17th and 19th century
New Latin poetry
translation theory and practice in the Age of Romanticism
Władysław Syrokomla (1823–1862)
Maciej Sarbiewski (1595–1640)
Władysław Syrokomla (Ludwik Kondratowicz)
teoria i praktyka przekładu w dobie romantyzmu
przekłady poezji polsko-łacińskiej
Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski
Opis:
This article outlines the approach adopted by Władysław Syrokomla (the pen name of Ludwik Kondratowicz) in his translation of Latin verse and examines, by analyzing some of the poems he translated into Polish, how it worked in practice. He believed that the translator should strive for an empathic attunement to the writers voice (Einfühlung) while ‘remaining oneself’ and that abandoning ‘slavish imitation’ was the best way to animate a poem (an approach much criticized by philological authorities). These ideas are discussed in the fi rst part of the article; the second part contains analyses of his translations of Latin odes written by Maciej Sarbiewski, i.e. Ode I 19 (Ad caelestem adspirat patriam), II 3 (Ad suam testudinem), and IV 12 (Ad Ianum Libinium. Solitudinem suam excusat). Syrokomla does not engage in any intertextual games with the ancients; instead, he adapts the original to the formal and stylistic conventions of his time, most notably the Romantic concept of the poem as a projection of a poetic consciousness (‘ego’). In effect, Sarbiewski’s (neo) classical poetic personas become versions of the Romantic hero, most conspicuously in the case of Ode IV 12.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2019, 3; 289-299
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies