Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Krąpiec" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
The method for the discovery of the absolute transcendental properties of being in Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec’s metaphysics
Metoda odkrywania absolutnych własności transcendentalnych bytu w metafizyce Mieczysława Alberta Krąpca
Autorzy:
Chidiebere Ekeocha, Kingsley
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452399.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
transcendentals
being
one
thing
realism
Albert Krąpiec
transcendentalia
istnienie
jedność
byt
realizm
Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec
Opis:
The need to preserve a realistic cognition of the world is imperative for realistic philosophy in the face of idealism, subjectivism and relativism. This paper captures the effort of a philosopher who is “faithful to reality” through his works. The [absolute] transcendental properties of being are real properties of real beings; they are neither empty concepts nor constructions of the mind detached from the existing being. They form the foundation for the rationality of the world without which nothing is knowable. There is also a method proper to the discovery of these properties. This method which is known as metaphysical separation demonstrates that realistic cognition is not naïve cognition; it enables us to discover that whatever exists is a determinate content with proportional existence, undivided in itself and divided from others, as well as a vehicle of truth, good and beauty. It is precisely in this sense that something is being, thing, one, something, truth, good and beauty.
Potrzeba zachowania realistycznego poznania świata jest konieczna dla filozofii realistycznej w obliczu idealizmu, subiektywizmu i relatywizmu. Niniejszy artykuł ukazuje wysiłek filozofa, który jest „wierny rzeczywistości”. Transcendentalne właściwości bytu są prawdziwymi właściwościami rzeczywistych istot; nie są ani pustymi ideami, ani konstruktami umysłu oderwanymi od istoty. Stanowią one podstawę racjonalności świata, bez której nic nie jest możliwe do poznania. Istnieje również metoda odpowiednia do odkrycia tych właściwości. Ta metoda to separacja metafizyczna, która dowodzi, że poznanie realistyczne nie jest naiwnym poznaniem, albowiem separacja pozwala nam odkryć, że cokolwiek co istnieje, jest determinowaną treścią o konkretnym istnieniu, niepodzielną w sobie i różną od innych, jak również jest nośnikiem prawdy, dobra i piękna
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2017, 6; 207-230
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
THE GOOD AS THE MOTIVE OF HUMAN ACTION ACCORDING TO MIECZYSŁAW ALBERT KRĄPIEC
Autorzy:
Kunat, Natalia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507302.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
metaphysics
good
action
motive
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Opis:
In this article the authoress has presented the understanding of the good as the motive for human action on the basis of the position of M. A. Krąpiec. At the beginning, the authoress has concentrated on an analysis of the fact of action, which includes three major factors: the end, the exemplar, and the efficient cause. The good-end here performs the most essential function. The good-end is the motive due to which action has come into existence rather than not. That “which throws” man “out of passivity” to action is described as the motive that appears as the good. In the next part of the article, the good is presented as a fundamental transcendental property of being. The connection of being with the good shows that the world that surrounds us is a world of goods, that is, of beings ordered to the will of a maker or of the Creator. The transcendental good thus understood constitutes the foundation for all action. In the final part of the article, an analysis is made of the functions that are shown by the good that constitutes the motive for action. The first of these functions is the cognitive apprehension of the good understood in the context of the end—the motive of action. At the end, the domains of goods are listed, in which the ontic good, which is a transcendental property of being, plays the most important role.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 155-166
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Lublin Philosophical School: Founders, Motives, Characteristics
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
McDonald, Hugh
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507314.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin Philosophical School
metaphysics
realism
philosophy
Krąpiec
Kalinowski
Swieżawski
Wojtyła
Opis:
The article is focused on the Lublin Philosophical School; it explains its name, presents its founders, reveals the causes of its rise, and introduce the specific character of the School’s philosophy. It starts with stating the fact that in the proper sense, the term “Lublin Philosophical School” describes a way of cultivating realistic (classical) philosophy developed in the 1950s by a group of philosophers at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland. The Lublin Philosophical School is characterized by cognitive realism (the object of cognition is really existing being), maximalism (taking up all existentially important questions), methodological autonomy (in relation to the natural-mathematical sciences and theology), transcendentalism in its assertions (its assertions refer to all reality), methodological-epistemological unity (the same method applied in objectively cultivated philosophical disciplines), coherence (which guarantees the objective unity of the object), and objectivity (achieved by the verifiability of assertions on their own terms, which is achieved by relating them in each instance to objective evidence). The term is the name of the Polish school of realistic (classical) philosophy that arose as a response to the Marxism that was imposed administratively on Polish institutions of learning, and also as a response to other philosophical currents dominant at the time such as phenomenology, existentialism, and logical positivism.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 405-422
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gilson, Krapiec and Christian Philosophy Today
Autorzy:
Tarasiewicz, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507358.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Christian philosophy
Gilson
Krapiec
metaphysics
university
Church
faith
theology
evangelization
Opis:
The author undertakes an attempt to answer the following question: is Christian philosophy possible today? The question seems to be of great importance due to the fact that what Christians who try to do philosophy usually encounter is bitter criticism which comes to them from two sides at once: that of academy and that of the Church. In short, for academy their philosophy is too Christian, and for the Church it is too academic. Being indebted to the insights of Étienne Gilson and Mieczyslaw A. Krapiec (the original Polish spelling: Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec, pronounced: myechisuaf albert krompyetz), the author comes to the conclusion that Christian philosophy is possible today only if: 1) it is not identified with the art of persuasion, as its final end lies in gaining understanding rather than being convincing, 2) it is the work of a Christian, and 3) it has the real world as its object and metaphysics as its method. For Christian philosophy—which in essence consists in doing philosophy by Christians in order to get more rational understanding of their religious faith—should be identified with the perfection of the intellect achieved by practicing the classical philosophy of being.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 281-392
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Lublin Philosophical School: Achievements, Identity and Prospects
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
McDonald, Hugh
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507540.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin Philosophical School
metaphysics
realism
philosophy
Krąpiec
Kalinowski
Swieżawski
Wojtyła
Opis:
The article is concentrated on the Lublin Philosophical School which came into being in the institutional framework of the Department of Philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; it describes its achievements, which took place at different stages of the School’s development, as well as the School’s new initiatives and challenges. The development of the School was connected with the involvement of new people and successive generations of new students who joined in the cultivation of realistic philosophy. One can regard the years 1950–1966 as the first stage of the School’s development, in which the School’s program was formulated. The following stages are the years 1967–1980, and 1981–2004, and the years that follow, in which new generations of students who take up inquiries in the spirit of the School’s program arrive. The article also explains the reasons why today the Lublin Philosophical School cannot be identified with the Department of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin, but rather with a special style of cultivating philosophy.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 423-441
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Concept of Culture in the Lublin Metaphysical School and the Interpretation Thereof in the Thought of Karol Wojtyła
Autorzy:
Panasiak, Brian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22676746.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-11-23
Wydawca:
Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Chełmie
Tematy:
Metaphysical Anthropology
Culture
Karol Wojtyła
Mieczysław Krąpiec
The Lublin Metaphysical School
Lublin Thomism
Opis:
The concept of culture is not often discussed in the field of metaphysical anthropology. Nonetheless it is of particular importance to the thought of both the Lublin School of Metaphysics and the thought of Karol Wojtyła. This work aims to build a bridge between these two philosophical positions, and thus define the similarities between them and the influence of the former on the position of the latter, specifically with regards to their views concerning culture. Analysis is made of texts which directly reference certain positions regarding culture, with particular terms being analyzed and compared. Of particular note, emphases is given to the place of “interpersonal relations” and “action” generally.
Źródło:
Language. Culture. Politics. International Journal; 2023, 1, 1; 169-177
2450-3576
2719-3217
Pojawia się w:
Language. Culture. Politics. International Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On the Relation Between Human and Technology
Autorzy:
Lizut, Rafał A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507402.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-03-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
man
technology
aim
function
morality
value
intentionality
artifact
Krąpiec
Lublin School of Philosophy
Opis:
According to the author, we live in the world which requires us to better understand the relationship between humans and technology, and especially technological artifacts. The author claims that this relationship, at least partially, can be explained in the framework of philosophy cultivated by the Lublin School of Philosophy represented by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec and his concepts of two intentionalites. However, in order to do justice to the human–artifact relationship two concepts of intentionality as elaborated by Krąpiec seem to be insufficient. The author then proposes to supplement Krąpiec’s concepts of the first intentionality present in the maker’s design and the second intentionality present in the artifact as an embodiment of that design with a concept of the third intentionality which is the inventive contribution of a user.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 1; 95-108
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
TO KNOW OR TO THINK—THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE UNDERSTANDING OF PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE LIGHT OF THE STUDIES OF MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC
Autorzy:
Duma, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507566.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
thinking
cognition
philosophy
knowledge
reality
abstract
sign
understanding
metaphysics
realism
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Opis:
The article concentrates on the specificity of philosophical cognition. Referring to Mieczysław A. Krąpiec’s study, the author proves that the process of thinking is not to be necessarily identified with the process of cognition, as in fact the former is merely a secondary phase of the latter. When identified with thinking, the philosophical cognition would undermine the very sense of cognition, which means the understanding of reality. When based on thinking alone, philosophy does not grasp real things, but operates with abstracts of being and being’s representations (concepts). As for the correctness of philosophical thinking the laws of logic, with ensuring non-contradictory operations, are sufficient enough. However, any knowledge that aspires to be philosophical has to start from really existing beings. In the next phases of cognition, such beings are grasped more and more particularly and precisely—starting from their transcendental properties and principles, then their structure and categorial properties, and finally their individual characteristics and actions. The very first act of cognition is directed to real beings, which are immediately grasped in respect of their existence and real essence. The second act of cognition deals with signs. The precedence of being in human cognition makes the philosophy charged not with a task of thinking about the world, but with the task of knowing and understanding it within possible and verifiable limits. Therefore, according to Krapiec, the very first philosophical discipline is metaphysics, which has real beings as its object. Thus, philosophical cognition should preserve its objective character, as this is the only way to guarantee its realism.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 277-299
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Thomistic Personalism as the Key to Understanding Human Altruism
Autorzy:
Ezewoko, Innocent C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507428.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-08-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Thomas Aquinas
Wojtyła
Krąpiec
altruism
personalism
evolution
person
freedom
action
motivation
self-determination
love
relation
egoism
Opis:
In this paper, the author attempts to explain human altruism within the framework of Thomistic personalism. He claims that (1) Thomistic personalism provides the necessary tools for understanding the human being as person in relation to other persons, and (2) it makes it possible to see the differences between personal and non-personal forms of human dynamism, which, when disregarded, easily lead to confusion. He concludes that, as an extention of love, altruism belongs to the personal, and, consequently, there is an intrinsic connection between personalism and altruism.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 3; 547-567
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Personalism in the Lublin School of Philosophy (Card. Karol Wojtyła, Fr. Mieczysław A. Krąpiec)
Autorzy:
Duma, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507334.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin School of Philosophy
Karol Wojtyła
Mieczysław Krąpiec
personalism
philosophy
metaphysics
person
man
experience
nature
culture
Opis:
The article presents the conception of personalism and the understanding of human person developed by two Polish philosophers: Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, the framers and the main representatives of the Lublin School of Philosophy. The author comes to the following conclusions: (1) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of personalism comes from experience and seeks verification in experience; it does not accept any a priori explanations or theses, though it does not shy away from drawing upon different branches of knowledge in its attempts to broaden experience, being aware that not everything is given to immediate experiential perception; (2) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s personalism wants to draw on the whole philosophical tradition, taking into account, at the same time, the findings of different sciences of man or humanities which broaden the experience of man or contribute something to the interpretation of experience; (3) bringing together genetic empiricism and methodical rationalism, Wojtyła and Krąpiec are able to avoid radicalism in the explanation of man, making a successful attempt to join in a complementary way these aspects of personal human being which carry some opposition; (4) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of person does not bear any traces of antagonism since it is not directed against anyone; in the light of this conception every human person has a character of the honest good which is the unconditional good, that is the highest and the ultimate good not competing with the value of anything else; (5) Wojtyła and Krąpiec prove that the conception of human person lies at the basis of understanding society, culture, ethics, law, politics, economy, art, and even religion.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 2; 365-390
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wojtyła and Krąpiec: Two Ways of Re-Empirizing Thomistic Anthropology
Wojtyła i Krąpiec: dwa sposoby reempiryzacji antropologii tomistycznej
Autorzy:
Mazur, Piotr Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31232747.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Karol Wojtyła
Mieczysław Krąpiec
Thomistic anthropology
first-person experience
empirization
re-empirization
antropologia tomistyczna
doświadczenie pierwszoosobowe
empiryzacja
reempiryzacja
Opis:
The development of studies on the first- and third-person human experience which took place in the 20th century revealed the need to re-empirize Thomistic anthropology. Among the thinkers who undertook this task were Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław Krąpiec. This re-empirization was linked with adapting the cognitive tools developed within the modern philosophy of the subject to descriptions of the first-person experience. Wojtyła assumed that the starting point of the cognition of the personal subject was the experience of performing an act, in opposition to what happens within a man. Krąpiec criticized this concept and proposed basing Thomistic anthropology on the subjective experience of existence, in which the ‘I’ manifests itself through ‘my’-acts. The experience of the act, on the one hand, and the immanence and transcendence of the self in relation to ‘my’-acts, on the other hand, allowed these philosophers to build an anthropological bridge to the Thomistic system.
Rozwój studiów nad pierwszo- i trzecioosobowym doświadczeniem ludzkim, jaki nastąpił w XX wieku, ujawnił potrzebę reempiryzacji antropologii tomistycznej. Wśród myślicieli, którzy podjęli się tego zadania, byli Karol Wojtyła i Mieczysław Krąpiec. Reempiryzacja ta była związana z dostosowaniem narzędzi poznawczych wypracowanych w ramach nowożytnej filozofii podmiotu do opisu doświadczenia pierwszoosobowego. Wojtyła zakładał, że punktem wyjścia poznania osobowego podmiotu jest doświadczenie spełniania aktu, w opozycji do tego, co dzieje się w człowieku. Krąpiec poddał krytyce tę koncepcję i zaproponował oparcie antropologii tomistycznej na podmiotowym doświadczeniu istnienia, w którym „ja” przejawia się poprzez „moje”-akty. Z jednej strony dosświadczenie aktu, a z drugiej – immanencja i transcendencja „ja” w odniesieniu do „moich”-aktów pozwoliły tym filozofom zbudować antropologiczny pomost do systemu tomistycznego.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2023, 71, 1; 273-288
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec’s Metaphysics of Law
Autorzy:
Stępień, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2057087.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
philosophy of law
metaphysics of law
natural law
human rights
common good
sovereingty
justice
relations
Opis:
The subject of interest of the philosophy (metaphysics) of law developed by Mieczy-sław A. Krąpiec is the existence of natural law, the ways in which the content of this law is formulated, the basis of established law and justice, the relationship between es-tablished law and natural law, and the conditions of law’s implementation in various communities. Krąpiec proposed, firstly, a realistic interpretation of law as a real and in-terpersonal relation; secondly, a concept of the analogical natural law; and thirdly, the interpretation of human rights as ways of realizing the personal nature of the human be-ing—as the ways which are found in the social context and proclaimed particularly in the form of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Concerning the philo-sophy of politics, Krąpiec considered the issue of the sovereignty of the human person in relation to sovereignty of society, nation, and the State, as well as the issue of politics understood as the realization of the common good in a prudent manner. Krąpiec also referred to the Polish tradition of defending the rights of nations, thus building the foun-dations of the philosophy of nation.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2021, 10, 4; 915-941
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Structure of a Person as the Basis for Determining the Common Good as Understood by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Autorzy:
Ragan, Gabriel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507340.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
man
person
common good
intellectual knowledge
will
good
love
religion
personal dignity
ontic completeness
legal subjectivity
Opis:
The author makes an attempt to analyze the anthropological views of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec in order to show the reasons why some elements of the structure of man as a person—resulting from the human mode of access to truth, goodness, beauty and religion—are essentially significant for determining the common good that lies at the foundation of all forms of human social life. He analyzes such parts of the human person’s structure as intellectual knowledge, will for the good, love, religion, personal dignity, ontic completeness and legal subjectivity.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 2; 305-317
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Krąpiec on the Specificity of Man
Autorzy:
Ugwuanyi, Faustinus I.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507584.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-03-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
man
human being
human person
specificity of man
anthropology
metaphysics
animal rationale
animal culturale
animal sociale
homo faber
homo religiosus
Opis:
The author presents selected insights offered by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, O.P., about the specificity of man. He starts with making a methodological remark about the correlation between Krąpiec’s anthropology and metaphysics. Then, he tries to grasp essentials in Krąpiec’s interpretation of attributes traditionally indicated as defining man alone, namely animal rationale, animal culturale, animal sociale, homo faber, and homo religiosus. Finally, he concludes that, although all these attributes aptly describe the specificity of man, they all are reducible to the fact that man is a person.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 1; 169-180
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Autorzy:
Chudy, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507466.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Krąpiec
Lublin Philosophical School
Catholic University of Lublin
Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
philosophy
metaphysics
realism
Thomism
existential judgment
metaphysical separation
metaphysical language
transcendentalizing cognition
theory of analogy
sovereign person
Opis:
This article introduces the life and work of Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec (1921-2008)—a Polish philosopher, theologian, humanist, co-founder of the Lublin Philosophical School, rector of the Catholic University of Lublin, initiator and chairman of the scientific committee of The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Krąpiec created a coherent philosophical system that, by a metaphysical explanation, encompassed the whole of reality that is accessible to human cognition. According to the author, Krąpiec’s philosophy is the greatest achievement in classical philosophy in Poland and in the world in the twentieth century, both with respect to its comprehensive scope and its meritorious importance; for the vision of the world that it reveals shows not only the human person’s unity and harmony with the reality that surrounds him, but also his openness to a connection with the transcendent Absolute.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2018, 7, 4; 549-566
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies