Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Hun" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
A newly discovered fragment of a Hunnic cauldron from site 59-60, Sanok, Poland
Autorzy:
Okońska-Bulas, Magdalena
Bulas, Jan
Mazurek, Mirosław
Garbacz-Klempka, Aldona
Perek-Nowak, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1385899.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
Hun period
hunnic cauldron
SEM-EDS
Upper San Basin
XRF
Opis:
The article presents a newly discovered fragment of the Hunnic cauldron, unearthed during investment research conducted at site 59-60 in Sanok, Sanok County, Podkarpackie Voivodeship. As a result of conducted excavations, an extensive settlement from the Late Roman Period and the Early Migration Period were discovered. The fragment of the cauldron in one of the most important discoveries from here. Up to date just over 20 specimens of cauldrons or their fragments are known from Central Europe. The presented one is just the second cauldron discovered in the area of Poland. The article contains the results of stylistic, typological and chemical analyzes confirming the interpretation of this find.
Źródło:
Acta Archaeologica Carpathica; 2020, 55; 235-254
0001-5229
2719-4841
Pojawia się w:
Acta Archaeologica Carpathica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On the History of the Population and Territorial Issues of the Gazakh Region of Azerbaijan
К вопросу об истории населения и территории газахского региона Азербайджана
Autorzy:
Mustafayev, Jamal M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28854907.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Azerbaijan
Gazakh
region
tribe
population
Hun
Kipchak
sanjak
county
Азербайджан
Газах
регион
племя
население
кыпчаки
гунны
санджаки
уезд
Opis:
The Gazakh region, located in the basin of Agstafa and Kura rivers in the northwest of Azerbaijan, was inhabited by the Gazakh tribe, which was part of the Hun tribal union from the first centuries of our era. The greater influx of the Gazakh tribe, which gave its name to the north-western region of Azerbaijan, took place in the XI–XII centuries at the invitation of the Georgian tsars who tried to free themselves from Seljuk dependence. During this period, the Gazakh tribe, which was part of the large Kipchak tribal union, lived in a part of the Kuban steppes. That area was called ‘Gazakhia’ after the name of the Gazakh tribe. Tens of thousands of Gazakhs who came to the South Caucasus at the invitation of the Georgian tsars settled in Georgia and converted to Christianity, while the other part began to live in the present-day Gazakh and Borchali regions. The Gazakhs living in the latter areas have preserved their national identity by mixing with their compatriots since the early Middle Ages. The Gazakh region, a part of the Safavid province with the status of a county, came under the influence of the Kartli-Kakheti kingdom in the second half of the XVIII century. During this period, a large part of the Gazakh tribe, who did not want to live under the rule of the Georgian tsars, moved to Ganja, Karabakh, Iravan khanates and the eastern provinces of Turkey.
Газахский регион, расположенный на северо-западе Азербайджана в бассейне рек Агстафа и Кура, был заселен с первых веков нашей эры казахским племенем, входившим в гуннское племенное объединение. Более крупный приток в регион казахского племени, давшего свое название Северо-Западному региону Азербайджана, произошел в XI–XII веках по приглашению грузинских царей, стремившихся освободиться от сельджукской зависимости. В этот период казахское племя, входившее в состав большого Кыпчакского племенного союза, жило в части кубанских степей. Эта территория называлась “Казахия” по имени казахского племени. Из десятков тысяч казахов, прибывших на Южный Кавказ по приглашению грузинских царей, часть поселилась в Грузии и приняла христианство, а другая часть стала жить в нынешних Газахском и Борчалинском регионах. Казахи, поселившиеся на последних территориях, еще со времен раннего средневековья сохраняли свою национальную самобытность, смешиваясь со своими соотечественниками, проживавшими здесь. Газахский регион, с XVI века находившийся в составе государства Сефевидов в статусе уезда, во второй половине XVIII века попал под влияние Картли-Кахетинского царства. В этот период значительная часть казахского племени, не желавшего жить под властью грузинских царей, переселилась в Гянджинское, Карабахское, Иреванское ханства и восточные провинции Турции.
Źródło:
Studia Orientalne; 2023, 2(26); 72-82
2299-1999
Pojawia się w:
Studia Orientalne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Edition of the Provisional Judicial Rules of the Judex-Curial Conference from 1861 and the Methodology of Editions of Historical Legal Sources
Autorzy:
Gábriš, Tomáš
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/924117.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
legal history
source edition
legal historical source
methodology of edition
theory of edition
Slovakian law
Hungarian law
Austrian law
customary law
source of law
continuity of law
Judex-Curial Conference
March Constitution of 1848
Austro-Hun
Opis:
The paper explains the methodology applied in the edition of historical legal sources of major importance for the 19th and 20th centuries Slovakia – the edition of the Provisional Judicial Rules (“PJR”) of the Judex-Curial Conference of 1861. At the Conference, legal scholars and politicians adopted a decision to abandon the previous twelve years of neoabsolutism and centralism introduced by the Austrian law, and opted for a renewal of the traditional Hungarian legal system with some changes introduced by the laws of March 1848 (the March Constitution of 1848). At the same time they retained some rules of Austrian origin and created some rules that were entirely new, particularly in the field of civil procedural law and inheritance law. While evaluating the legal nature of the PJR, the literature used to claim that they never became law because Parliament of 1861 was not created legally (representatives were not elected under the electoral law enacted as part of the March Constitution of 1848) and because the monarch, Francis Joseph I, had not yet been crowned (his coronation took place in 1867). Therefore the legislative process could not be successfully completed. The only solution that was reported to was the recognition of the exceptional situation which dominated in Hungary between 1861–1867 – it was the period between neoabsolutism and another provisorium, a period of “limited constitutionalism”. Under such conditions it was not possible to meet the formalities of official legislation process. Thus PJR could become binding only de facto – through the power of persuasion. However, after a corpus of case law began to consolidate during several years, it could be argued that the PJR was transformed from the actual source of judicial decision-making into customary law.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa; 2014, 7, 3; 463-483
2084-4115
2084-4131
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies