Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Tatarczyk, Dawid" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Political Preferences of QCA Methods Institutes? A Comment on the Availability and Gender Gap Disparity Problems
Autorzy:
Tatarczyk, Dawid
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375457.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-07-03
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Śląski. Wydział Nauk Społecznych
Tematy:
QCA
methods institutes
gender gap
Opis:
In this research note, I examine a set of two interrelated questions about the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) methods institutes. First, I assembled and analyzed a novel dataset that tracks every QCA related training worldwide from 2002 to 2018. My examination finds that although QCA trainings are becoming more popular in Europe, the US is still the single most frequent host country for such events. Secondly, I examine the extent to which gender gap exists among QCA instructors. My findings show that female QCA instructors are severely under-represented, which likely limits their academic and professional opportunities. Thus, the QCA research community appears to be marked by the same structural challenges to diversity and gender equality as other areas of political science. Overall, this paper should of interest to scholars interested in the impact of academic infrastructures on future research trajectories as well as those concerned about gender equality in academia.
Źródło:
Political Preferences; 2021, 28; 23-31
2449-9064
Pojawia się w:
Political Preferences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Dēmos still Matters: Bridging the Gap between Political Theory and Democratization Research
Autorzy:
Tatarczyk, Dawid
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1790277.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-03-22
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne
Tematy:
research methods
democracy
democratization
dēmos
Cleisthenes
Ancient Greece
Opis:
This paper attempts to bridge the gap between contemporary scholars of democratization and researchers studying the political history of Ancient Greece. Although these two subfields already share important commonalities, they have remained indifferent to each other’s work. I argue that the dēmos can serve as yet another area of convergence between them. The increased dialogue between these two research traditions should enrich scholarly debates in both subfields and it also offers an opportunity to address their methodological drawbacks. Specifically, contemporary democratization research tends to undervalue the significance of ordinary people in the democratization process. Conversely, scholars of the ancient Greek world have a tendency to be enigmatic about their use of research methods, which potentially perpetuates the perception that political theorists engage in anachronistic research. Thus, bridging these two camps offers a real opportunity to enrich them individually, as well as the democratization paradigm that underpins both of them.
Źródło:
Polish Sociological Review; 2021, 213, 1; 71-86
1231-1413
2657-4276
Pojawia się w:
Polish Sociological Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies