Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Krajewski, Stanisław" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Can a Robot Be Grateful? Beyond Logic, Towards Religion
Autorzy:
Krajewski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451269.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-28
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Tematy:
computer science
robot
Gödel’s theorem
digitalization
Pythagoreanism
context
Church’s Thesis
philosophy of dialogue
gratitude
prayer
Opis:
Philosophy should seriously take into account the presence of computers. Computer enthusiasts point towards a new Pythagoreanism, a far reaching generalization of logical or mathematical views of the world. Most of us try to retain a belief in the permanence of human superiority over robots. To justify this superiority, Gödel’s theorem has been invoked, but it can be demonstrated that this is not sufficient. Other attempts are based on the scope and fullness of our perception and feelings. Yet the fact is that more and more can be computer simulated. In order to secure human superiority over robots, reference to the realm of human relations and attitudes seems more promising. Insights provided by philosophy of dialogue can help. They suggest an ultimate extension of the Turing test. In addition, it seems that in order to justify the belief in human superiority one must rely on the individual experiences that indicate a realm that is not merely subjective. It makes sense to call it religious.
Źródło:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2018, 2, 4(6); 4-13
2544-302X
Pojawia się w:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
An Explanation of the Plural Form of God’s Name
Autorzy:
Krajewski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451275.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-07-18
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Tematy:
Elohim
God’s name
Hebrew Bible
Judaism
Biblical criticism
Jewish philosophy
Opis:
God’s name “Elohim,” common in the Hebrew Bible and Jewish tradition, is always used with verbs in the singular even though it is in the plural form. It is shown here that the ungrammatical usage can be seen as the best solution to a natural problem. Namely, tradition assumes that it should be impossible to talk about a general category of gods within which the one God could be located. The best and perhaps the only way to prevent the implicit pluralization of the unique God is to put his name in plural even though it is intended to be used as if it were singular. One cannot form the plural form of the name that is already grammatically plural! Surprisingly, this explanation seems to have been considered by neither classical nor modern commentators.
Źródło:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2018, 2, 2(4); 115-121
2544-302X
Pojawia się w:
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On the Anti-Mechanist Arguments Based on Gödel’s Theorem
Autorzy:
Krajewski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1796977.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
Tematy:
Gödel’s theorem
mechanism
Lucas’s argument
Penrose’s argument
computationalism
mind
consistency
algorithm
artificial intelligence
natural number
Opis:
The alleged proof of the non-mechanical, or non-computational, character of the human mind based on Gödel’s incompleteness theorem is revisited. Its history is reviewed. The proof, also known as the Lucas argument and the Penrose argument, is refuted. It is claimed, following Gödel himself and other leading logicians, that antimechanism is not implied by Gödel’s theorems alone. The present paper sets out this refutation in its strongest form, demonstrating general theorems implying the inconsistency of Lucas’s arithmetic and the semantic inadequacy of Penrose’s arithmetic. On the other hand, the limitations to our capacity for mechanizing or programming the mind are also indicated, together with two other corollaries of Gödel’s theorems: that we cannot prove that we are consistent (Gödel’s Unknowability Thesis), and that we cannot fully describe our notion of a natural number.
Źródło:
Studia Semiotyczne; 2020, 34, 1; 9-56
0137-6608
Pojawia się w:
Studia Semiotyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On Suprasubjective Existence in Mathematics
Autorzy:
Krajewski, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/561339.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
Tematy:
mathematics
Platonism
formalism
existence
objective
subjective
intersubjective
suprasubjective
culture
rainbow
Opis:
The professional mathematician is a Platonist with regard to the existence of mathematical entities, but, if pressed to tell what kind of existence they have, he hides behind a formalist approach. In order to take both attitudes into account in a possibly serious way, the concept of suprasubjective existence is proposed. It involves intersubjective existence, plus a stress on objectivity devoid of actual objects. The idea is illustrated, following William Byers, by the phenomenon of the rainbow: it is not an object but can be said to possess a subjective objectivity.
Źródło:
Studia Semiotyczne; 2018, 32, 2; 75-86
0137-6608
Pojawia się w:
Studia Semiotyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies