Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "philosophy of linguistics" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
    Tytuł:
    I-Semantics: Foundational Questions
    Autorzy:
    da Silva, Adriano Marques
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/561356.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
    Tematy:
    syntax – semantics interface
    generativism
    philosophy of linguistics
    Opis:
    What is the scope of a semantic theory consistent with the theoretical assumptions adopted by the generative program? In this paper I will show that the linguistic theory generically known as generative grammar is an extremely coherent Scientific Research Program and within this descriptive framework it’s possible to characterize the main features of an I-semantics. First, will be presented the hardcore of the generative program, its heuristics and Chomsky’s criticism towards formal semantics. Second, I will compare two approaches: the denotational approach by Larson and Segal and the intensional approach by Paul Pietroski. I argue in favor of Pietroski’s approach, because it is more coherent with the core assumptions of the generative program. The main argument is that syntax, in the context of the generative program is explanatory and, in this very context, semantics is not. Therefore, in order to account for the explanatory role of syntax in the generative program it is necessary to review certain foundational assumptions commonly accepted in formal semantics.
    Źródło:
    Studia Semiotyczne; 2017, 31, 2; 77-112
    0137-6608
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Semiotyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Pragmatics, discourse and philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Cap, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28762701.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki w Bydgoszczy. Wydawnictwo Uczelniane
    Tematy:
    philosophy of language
    philosophy of linguistics
    pragmatics
    discourse analysis
    discourse practice
    discourse data
    speech act
    macro speech act
    presupposition
    Proximization Theory
    Opis:
    Following the linguistic turn in analytical philosophy, concern for language underlies some of the most important strands of philosophical practice, making issues of mind, language and discourse virtually inseparable elements of scientific inquiry. Just as philosophy looks to language and linguistics to endorse different ontological and epistemological postulates, linguistics looks to philosophy in addressing its key questions of meaning, function and use. In this paper I argue that pragmatics and discourse analysis are areas where the relation between language, linguistics and philosophy is particularly salient. Crucially, philosophy, its conceptions and frameworks, should never be viewed as ‘external’ to discourse. Rather, discourse and discourse study involving pragmatic tools are, in themselves, areas of intense philosophical practice. Results of this practice are relevant and of interest to not only language philosophers, but also to those exploring ontological and epistemological matters of general philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne; 2022, 13; 123-141
    2084-1302
    Pojawia się w:
    Heteroglossia- studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Needing the other: the anatomy of the Mass Noun Thesis
    Autorzy:
    Brons, Lajos
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/437204.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
    Tematy:
    othering
    interpretation
    philosophy of linguistics
    philosophy of anthropology
    folk-ontology
    numeral classifiers
    mass nouns
    odróżnianie
    interpretacja
    filozofia lingwistyki
    antropologia filozoficzna
    ontologia potoczna / ludowa
    numeryczne klasyfikatory
    rzeczowniki zbiorcze
    Opis:
    Othering is the construction and identification of the self or in-group and the other or out-group in mutual, unequal opposition by attributing relative inferiority and/or radical alienness to the other/out-group. Othering can be “crude” or “sophisticated”, the defining difference being that in the latter case othering depends on the interpretation of the other/out-group in terms that are applicable only to the self/in-group but that are unconsciously assumed to be universal. The Mass Noun Thesis, the idea that all nouns in certain languages are grammatically and folk-ontologically similar to mass nouns in English, is an example of such sophisticated othering. According to this Thesis, (a) count nouns refer to discrete objects and mass nouns to stuffs; (b) the other’s language has only mass nouns and thus no count nouns; and therefore, (c) the other’s folk-ontology is an ontology of mass stuffs only. There is much evidence, however, that folk-ontology is independent from language. This paper argues that the Mass Noun Thesis is a case of sophisticated othering rooted in a conflation of grammatical and ontological conceptions of mass and count nouns that is applicable to the language of the interpreter/self but not to the languages of the relevant others, and that othering in this case is driven by a need to create some radically alien other to support a scientific or philosophical theory.
    Źródło:
    ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2014, 4, 1; 103-122
    2083-6635
    2084-1043
    Pojawia się w:
    ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Linguistics and philosophy: the dimensions of the 21st century
    Autorzy:
    Biskub, Iryna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/462660.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Chełmie
    Tematy:
    linguistics
    philosophy
    induction
    deduction
    categorization
    software discourse
    lingwistyka
    filozofia
    indukcja
    dedukcja
    kategoryzacja
    dyskurs programowy
    Opis:
    The article highlights the new dimensions for the integral interaction between linguistics and philosophy in the 21st century. Starting from the philosophical conceptions of B. Russel and L Wittgenstein the question of how to acquire the linguistic knowledge – by experience or reasoning – still brings about scientific debate. In the present paper we give reasons to the idea that philosophy based on language analysis is one thing; the basing of language analysis on philosophy is quite another. Modern applications of the linguistic analysis based on the use of philosophical methods and categories are suggested; the choice of language means for the effective human-computer interaction via graphical user interfaces of computer software is one of them. The main focus of the article is explaining the mechanisms of formal inductive modeling and deductive reasoning that are involved in selecting appropriate language means for the software discourse. Special attention is given to linguistic categorization that serves as a bridge between deductive reasoning and formal inductive modeling.
    Artykuł przedstawia nowe kierunki zintegrowanego badania nad językiem w filozofii XXI wieku. Poczynając od filozoficznych koncepcji Russela i Wittgensteina, do dziś kontynuuje się debatę naukową poświęconą problematyce determinacji znaczenia lingwistycznego – przez doświadczenie lub myślenie. W artykule podjęto próbę wykazania, że filozofia oparta na analizie językowej - to jedno, zaś analiza językowa wywodząca się z filozofii – to zupełnie coś innego. Artykuł proponuje nowoczesną analizę opartą na wykorzystaniu filozoficznych metod i kategorii; jedną z kwestii jest wybór narzędzi językowych w celu skutecznej komunikacji człowiek-komputer za pomocą interfejsu graficznego. Badanie koncentruje się na wyjaśnieniu metod formalnego modelowania indukcyjnego i wnioskowania dedukcyjnego. Powyżej wspomniane metody są wykorzystane w procesie wyboru odpowiednich narzędzi językowych dla oprogramowania komputerowego. Szczególną uwagę zwraca się na kategoryzację językową, która służy jako pomost między wnioskowaniem dedukcyjnym a formalnym modelowaniem indukcyjnym.
    Źródło:
    Language. Culture. Politics. International Journal; 2018, 1; 7-18
    2450-3576
    2719-3217
    Pojawia się w:
    Language. Culture. Politics. International Journal
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Naming God: Christian Philosophy of Language, Wierzbicka’s Natural Semantic Metalanguage and Intercultural Dialogue
    Autorzy:
    Popiołek, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/560046.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    philosophy of language
    theolinguistics
    linguistics
    semantics
    Cappadocians
    accommodation
    Opis:
    Who is He, to Whom we address words God, Theos, Deus, etc.? How far goes possibility for adaptation of religious and philosophical language from other (non-Western) cultures? Do  people, by  using certain words and terms, denote being of God, or are they just conventional names? Those questions were raised quite early in theological debates in early stages of Christianity, and answers were given by such prominent Church Fathers as Gregory of Nyssa and Basil the Great. The problem resurfaced millennium later, when Western missionaries encountered nations and people whose religious and philosophical concepts were far different from their own. Should they accommodate local terms to fit the Christian concept of God, or should they introduce Western terminology? This translational and linguistic problem leads to the question: are there universal concepts which (despite of cultural affiliation, based on the common human experience) could communicate the Christian idea of God? Findings of Wierzbicka, and her own claim is: yes – there are semantic primes, through which we  can translate our ideas (with minor imperfections). But this last question goes beyond the reach of mere secular linguistics, and enters the domain of theology. For it is theological claim that in our human nature we are capable of addressing Triune God.
    Źródło:
    Theological Research. A Journal of Systematic Theology; 2016, 4; 117-132
    2300-3588
    Pojawia się w:
    Theological Research. A Journal of Systematic Theology
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Lying and Misleading within the Philosophy of Language: A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective
    Autorzy:
    Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Marta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/888707.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    lying
    misleading
    relevance theory
    explicature
    linguistics
    Grice, Paul
    Opis:
    The aim of the paper is to examine the lying/misleading distinction from a relevance-theoretic perspective (cf. Sperber and Wilson [1986] 1995; 2004; Wilson and Sperber 2002; 2012). On standard accounts, the distinction is drawn parallel to the saying/implicating distinction. ‘What is said’, rooted in Grice (1975), has been subject to extensive discussion and numerous reanalyses under a variety of terms (see, for example, Recanati 1993; Bach 1994; Carston 2002), but no agreement has been reached as to the content of ‘what is said’ and the borderline between ‘what is said’ and ‘what is implicated’. Accordingly, within the philosophy of language the attempts to capture the lying/misleading distinction (Meibauer 2005; 2011; 2014ab; Saul 2012ab; Stokke 2013; 2016) rely on diff erent notions of ‘what is said’. The paper is an attempt to take a stance in the debate on the distinction under discussion from the perspective of Relevance Theory (Sperber and Wilson [1986] 1995; 2004; Wilson and Sperber 2012), which is a cognitive extension and modifi cation of Gricean model of communication and has been seriously concerned with the elaborated concept of what is said, known as ‘explicature’. One of our goals is to see how the relevance-theoretic understanding of “what is said” (Carston 2002; 2009; 2010; Carston and Hall 2012) aff ects the lying/misleading distinction, and the other way round. In an attempt to provide ground for the relevance-theoretic account, a critical overview and comparison of the existing approaches to lying and misleading is also presented.
    Źródło:
    Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies; 2017, 26/2; 79-100
    0860-5734
    Pojawia się w:
    Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Von den “Luftgebäuden” der Philosophie in der Stadt der Sprache: An Analysis of the Metaphors in the First Part of Wittgenstein’s <i>Philosophical Investigations<i/>
    Autorzy:
    Porcaro, Ciro
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27321784.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-12-15
    Wydawca:
    Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk we Wrocławiu
    Tematy:
    Metaphor Analysis
    Philosophical Investigations
    German Linguistics
    Wittgenstein
    Philosophy of Language
    Opis:
    The present study has as its object three of the most frequent and representative metaphors of the first part (paragraphs from 1 to 133) of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. In particular, the analysis focuses on the following mappings: LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS ARE TOOLS, LANGUAGE IS A CITY and MEANING IS A PURE CRYSTAL. The methodological approach adopted in the study as well as the analytical proceedings are both borrowed from the theory of conceptual metaphor (see: Lakoff and Johnson 1980, Lakoff 1993 and Kövecses 2002, 2020). The three metaphors were identified through a careful manual search of the text. An automatic search for source domain vocabulary followed to identify any further instances of the metaphors. In a second step, the conceptual structure of the metaphors was outlined; the entailments of the mappings were listed and interpreted on the backdrop of the arguments developed in Wittgenstein’s work. Finally, a comparison of the structures of the three conceptual metaphors was made. The analysis revealed the existence of complex and coherent conceptual mappings motivating the use of the identified metaphorical expressions. The comparison among the three metaphors confirmed the hypothesis that the entailments of the first two mappings mentioned above are all consistent with each other, playing a fundamental role in the comprehension of Wittgenstein’s position on language and meaning. Conversely, the internal logic of the third metaphor reflects a conception of language rejected by the philosopher.
    Źródło:
    Academic Journal of Modern Philology; 2023, 19; 257-270
    2299-7164
    2353-3218
    Pojawia się w:
    Academic Journal of Modern Philology
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies