Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "mechanism of supervision" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The European system of financial supervision – regulatory impact assessment
Autorzy:
Szpringer, Mariusz
Szpringer, Włodzimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/565664.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-10-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
European banking union
European Central Bank
Single Supervisory Mechanism
Single Resolution Mechanism
European Stability Mechanism Meroni, doctrine
regulatory impact assessment
Opis:
Complexity and uncertainty in the application of the regulations of the European system of financial supervision are due to the fact that its particular elements were implemented over a period of time. First, it was a system of European financial supervision authorities i.e. the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and the Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), whose main objective was to coordinate national actions. Then there were established the European Banking Union, including the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), as well as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which constitutes also a part of the system of support for endangered banks. Legal interpretation problems are a result of differences in the scope of competences of these entities. For example, there is uncertainty whether the regulations refer to the eurozone or the whole European Union and if they refer to banks only or to other financial institutions as well. An analysis of the SSM, the SRM or the ESM does not always offer a clear answer to questions such as: who, when and using what tools should act; when, for example, the ECB may and should correct the decisions of national supervisors; what is the role of the ESRB, if we take account of the enhanced competences of the ECB in the banking union; if and when banks may question supervisory decisions concerning, for example, establishing a buffer or classifying an institution as SIFI, etc. Similarly, the role of the EBA or the ESM is unclear in the context of the establishment of the banking union, the SSM, the SRM, the ESM and the delegation of power of the ECB and the European Commission to regulatory agencies (Meroni doctrine) or the practice of establishing regulatory agencies outside the bounds of the treaty (Pringle doctrine). Therefore the regulatory landscape in this context requires impact assessment.
Źródło:
Journal of Banking and Financial Economics; 2017, 2(8); 84-104
2353-6845
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Banking and Financial Economics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Security management of systemically important banking institutions inside the European Union financial market
Autorzy:
Pyka, Irena
Pyka, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/325162.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Politechnika Śląska. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
Tematy:
banki globalne
instytucje finansowe o znaczeniu systemowym
ryzyko systemowe
unia bankowa
mechanizm jednolitego nadzoru
SSM
europejski system postępowania naprawczego
SRM
MREL
TLAC
global banks
systemically important financial institutions
systemic risk
banking union
Single Supervision Mechanism
European resolution regime
Opis:
This paper is focused on the problems related to activities of systemically important banking institutions. After the global financial crisis, these institutions were held responsible for the escalation of systemic risk in the international economy. The paper analyses how both the supervision and the regulatory tools that are used in European Union countries to deal with formally identified systemically important institutions have changed. The direct goal of the paper is to identify the specific features of the new regulatory order with regard to global and other systemically important institutions that operate in the European Union. The results of the analysis indicate that the extension of the extent of supervision over activities undertaken by these institutions and the introduction of new prudential regulations, including resolution regimes, do not guarantee the security and the stability of European Union’s financial market. Keywords: global banks, systemically important financial institutions, systemic risk, banking union, Single Supervision Mechanism (SSM), European resolution regime – SRM, MREL, TLAC
Źródło:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska; 2019, 136; 495-510
1641-3466
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies