Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "eius" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
“… cum statuti tanta sit auctoritas, ut eius praeceptione omnia nobis conserventur.” Some Remarks on Wioletta Pawlikowska-Butterwick and Liudas Jovaiša’s Vilniaus ir Žemaičių Katedrų Kapitulų Statutai
Autorzy:
Dyjakowska, Marzena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1803255.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-28
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
diocesan statutes
Diocese of Samogitia
Žemaitija
Diocese of Vilnius
cathedral
chapter
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the edition of the statutes of the chapters of Vilnius and Samogitia authored by Wioletta Pawlikowska-Butterwick and Liudas Jovaiša. The presentation is preceded by a description of the history of both dioceses and remarks on the role of statutes as the source of the particular law of both chapters. Some space was devoted to the authors of the statutes and related issues. The editorial basis and the critical apparatus were discussed. Finally, attention was drawn to the illustrations accompanying the edition.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych; 2018, 28, 3; 35-43
1507-7896
2544-5227
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Paul of Pyskowice’s Autonomous Question Utrum universalia subsistant
Autorzy:
Wojtczak, Hanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/51122687.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
Cod. BJ 1900
Albertus Magnus
opinio Platonis
opinio Vicklefistarum
opinio Aristotelis
universale in potentia
universale secundum actum
universale in re
post rem
ante rem
universale pro eius formali/materiali/essentiali significato
Opis:
The subject of the present article is a critical edition of an autonomous question Utrum universalia subsistant by Paweł of Pyskowice († ca. 1467), an eminent Kraków scholar. The question is preserved on a loose two-leaf fold and is now attached to Paul’s commentary on Isagoge contained in cod. BJ 1900, held in the manuscript collection of the Jagiellonian Library in Krakow. This question, however, does not form a coherent part of cod. BJ 1900. On the basis of the hand testimony and taking into account the fact that the quire was not bound together with the codex, the probable time frame of the quaestio with its accompanying glosses is 1423–1445. The degree of originality of this autonomous question cannot be determined at the present stage of research, nor has a text been found that may have been a direct source for Paul.Only two fragments incorporated by Paul without any references have been identified. Their ultimate source is Albert the Great. There are two apparatuses in the edition: fontium, which contains the identification of direct and indirect quotations of the source texts; editorial, which shows corrections, deletions, additions, marginal glosses and lacunae due to paper decay.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2022, 12, 2; 473-490
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Discussion on the Existence of Universals in Paul of Pyskowice’s Autonomous Question "Utrum universalia subsistant" preserved in Cod. BJ 1900
Autorzy:
Wojtczak, Hanna
Krauze-Błachowicz, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/51122673.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
Tematy:
Cod. BJ 1900
Albertus Magnus
opinio Platonis
opinio Vicklefistarum
opinio Aristotelis
universale in potentia
universale secundum actum
universale in re
post rem
ante rem
universale pro eius formali/materiali/essentiali significato
Krakow
Jagiellonian Library
Opis:
The problem of the ontological status of universals is one of the most important topics of the medieval discussion, which was also attended by Paweł of Pyskowice, a scholar from Kraków in the first half of the 15th century. He addressed this question in his very extensive commentary on Isagoga (preserved in cod. BJ 1900, mostly in Paul’s handwriting), whose authorship was for years wrongly attributed to Benedict Hesse. In this commentary, 9 questions were devoted to the so-called difficult Porfrian questions. Two of them bear the title Utrum univeralia subsistant. The same title is also given to the stand-alone question (written in Paul’s handwriting but loosely attached to cod. BJ 1900) which is the subject of this paper. Although it repeats the subject of two questions belonging to the commentary, it definitely differs from them — not only in substance but also in form. At the beginning, Paul presents three realistic positions: two extreme ones, i.e. Platonic and Wyclifist, and a moderate one — Aristotelian. Referring to them, he adopts the Aristotelian solution, according to which there is no universal in essendo separated from individual things. Paweł analyses universals on two levels: the metaphysical or epistemological, and the logical.
Źródło:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal; 2022, 12, 2; 311-328
2083-6635
2084-1043
Pojawia się w:
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies