Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Rus’" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Odraz kultúrneho dedičtva Podkarpatskej Rusi v dielach českých a slovenských autorov medzivojného obdobia
The Reflection of Cultural Heritage of Subcarpathian Rus in the Works of Czech and Slovak Authors of the Interwar Period
Autorzy:
Falat, Michal
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375567.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Subcarpathian Rus
cultural heritage
Czechoslovakia
interwar period
Ruś Podkarpacka
dziedzictwo kulturowe
Czechosłowacja
okres międzywojenny
Opis:
After some fifty years of Magyarisation, many Ruthenians decided to leave the Hungarian kingdom at the end of the Great War. In the Czechoslovak republic, which became home for some of them, these Ruthenians became members of society and were granted the status of autonomy. Given the absence of any historical predecessor of an autonomous Ruthenian state before 1918, the Ruthenian people were simply not prepared to rule a completely independent state. Their society lacked formative social classes such as intelligentsia and burgeoisie, which were necessary in order to secure a functioning state administration. Instead, these key roles were taken up by the Czechoslovak intelligentsia, which played a considerable part in the formation of Subcarpathian Rus. Since many of them had no previous knowledge about the region, they were astonished by its people, culture and nature. Czechoslovak representatives, enchanted by local society, often immortalized their impressions in literature and other forms of art. This paper focuses on the most important – but often less known – works of Czechoslovak intelligentsia in Subcarpathian Rus during interwar period, which capture its largely lost historical heritage.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2020, 11; 82-97
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Český etnograf Jan Húsek a jeho výskumná cesta po slovensko-rusínskom pomedzí v 20. rokoch 20. storočia
Autorzy:
Švorc, Peter
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375571.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Jan Húsek
Czechoslovakia
Slovaks
Rusyns
border between Slovakia and Subcarpathian Rus’
census
Československo
Slováci
Rusíni
krajinská hranica
sčítanie obyvateľstva
Opis:
When Czechoslovakia was established in 1918 and incoporated Subcarpathian Rus’ in September 1919, the questions of Rusyn autonomy and the border between Subcarpathian Rus’ and Slovakia emerged. Rusyns requested that the territory of Eastern Slovakia – the historic counties of Spiš, Šariš and Zemplín – where many of them also lived, be included in Subcarpathian Rus’. The Slovak side refused it point-blank, which was apparent considered these counties to be Slovak, with Slovak majority populations, as it was apparent in the censuses taken in pre-1918 Hungary and Czechoslovakia in 1919, 1921 and 1930. There was therefore a danger of confl ict between the two Slavic nations forming the new state. The Czech ethnographer Jan Húsek was one of experts trying to prevent the confl ict from happening. In the 1920s, he took research trips to Eastern Slovakia to fi nd out where the ethnographic border between Slovaks and Rusyns lay. He planned, based on his fi ndings, to suggest to the Czechoslovak government where a fair internal border between Slovakia and Subcarpathian Rus’ should be placed. He published his researchin a voluminous monograph Národopisná hranice mezi Slováky a Karpatorusy (The Ethnological Border between Slovaks and Carpathian Rusyns, 1925). The conclusion of his work was, however, tentative. It was impossible to determine the ethnographic border between Slovaks and Rusyns in Eastern Slovakia, as Slovak and Rusyn inhabitants did not live in separate settlements; on the contrary, they were intermixed not only from the geographical viewpoint, but also regarding their family and work life, as well as in confession, culture, customs, etc. In the end, the border between Slovakia and Subcarpathian Rus’ maintained of the shape that was approved at the Paris Peace Conference and, for the entire interwar period, served as a permanent source of tension in Slovak-Rusyn relations.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2020, 11; 98-110
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies