Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Bochenski" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 58
Tytuł:
Metafizyka w marksizmie? – Materializm dialektyczny i jego konsekwencje w ujęciu o. Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Pawlikowski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966262.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
marksizm
metafizyka
sowietologia
Józef M. Bocheński
Marxism
Metaphysics
Sovietology
Joseph M. Bocheński
Opis:
Father Józef Maria Bocheński OP (1902– 1995) was considered a leading sovietologist. At the University of Fribourg, he founded in 1957 the Institute of Eastern Europe, in which the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism was studied scientifically. The results were published in the journal „Studies in Soviet Thought”. He initiated the uprising in Cologne Ost-Kolleg, where knowledge about Soviet philosophy and communism was disseminated. In the years 1961–1962 he was also its director. In his publications he undertook, among others the question of the metaphysics of Marxism, seeing it generally in dialectical materialism and, in specific applications, also in historical materialism. Criticizing this trend of thought, he focused on its latest findings, developed in the Soviet philosophy in the fifties of the twentieth century. Approaching the criticism from an external point of view, he pointed out some significant inconsistencies of Marxist materialism. According to the first law of dialectics, it proclaims a universal cause-effect determinism, and at the same time allows for the occurrence of random events. Explaining the existence of consciousness in matter with the adopted concept of cognition, Marxism mixes the epistemological and ontological order. Moreover, this trend uses the unscientific understanding of matter. On the basis of the considerations of Father Bocheński, it can also be concluded that the fundamental inconsistency of Marxist materialism is the acceptance of the existence of a spiritual element (consciousness) different in quality from mat-ter, while maintaining the thesis that there is only matter and what comes from it.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 301-316
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kategorie społeczne i ich znaczenie w myśli o. Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego OP
Autorzy:
Grzybowski, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966058.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Bocheński
cywilizacja
naród
kultura
społeczeństwo
ojczyzna
Bochenski
civilization
nation
culture
society
homeland
Opis:
Józef Innocenty Maria Bocheński was one of the most colourful figures of the 20th century Polish emigration. His eventful biography would have been sufficient to endow with it several people – Dominican father, logician, historian of philosophy, sovietologist, army chaplain, pilot and traveller, renowned lecturer and valued preacher, he was one of the most original and outstanding Polish intellectuals. As a scholar, lecturer and publicist he left a vast legacy. Thomism was a starting point of his academic journey (under supervision of Fr. Jacek Woroniecki), later on he devoted himself to logic and analytic philosophy. He described himself as a rationalist, analyst and exponent of objectivity. This rationalist trait was characteristic of Fr. Bocheński - he perceived all problems and issues through the lens of philosophical realism, cognitive objectivity and, in his earlier writings, from the standpoint of Thomism with its basic metaphysical categories. In his analyses Bocheński made Aristotelian realism his point of departure, claiming that a man as a person is essentially a social being because of his spiritual nature. A human being is a social being both in a negative („a man as a person cannot live without society because his full development will be impossible to achieve without it”) and positive sense („man is adapted to society, coexistence and cooperation with other people”). These bonds and relationships are so strong that sociability constitutes an essential feature of human nature. Society is therefore a group of human persons who share a common goal which is the common good. For Bocheński all individualistic approaches, in which a man is regarded as a monad minding his own interests and goals, who enters into relationships with other people solely for serving his utilitarian purposes, unable to satisfy his egoistic desires on his own, are false. In this view, deriving from Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau, an individual needs other people only due to his own insufficiency in achieving his aims. Hence the necessity of „social contract” that unites egoistic individuals - its legal validity begets community. Bocheński rejects as opposed to reality all divisions between individual and social nature of a man, in particular the social contract theory according to which society should be understood as the outcome of an agreement between people. The most difficult, but also the most interesting social issue tackled by Fr. Bocheński is an attempt to explain what a civilisation is. Writing about civilization Bocheński usually had in mind civilizational circle – a certain area inhabited by people who have certain common ideals. He generally omitted an important but also complex and differently solved by various thinkers problem of difference between civilization and culture and their mutual relationship. Clarifying the notion of civilization Bocheński pointed out that the distinction between the three kinds of civilization, namely „subjective civilization”, „material civilization”, and „model civilization” might prove helpful. In his opinion the relationship between material civilization and subjective civilization is such that the former is the result and consequence of the latter. If we acknowledge - Bocheński wrote - that the essence of a human being is some immortal substance (soul, conscience, intellect), it follows that a man cannot be a mere instrument, but he has always to be the objective. It means that no society, nation, state or another individual has a right to subordinate completely a human being. Model civilization based on personalistic ideals can be brought about by the meeting of Greek philosophy, Roman law and Christian Gospel. This encounter made it possible to discover the uniqueness of category of person and became one of the main foundations of Christian civilization. Affirmation of a person, as Bocheński argued, is one of the most important hallmarks of this ci-vilization, without which democracy in its modern sense could not have been born and would not be able to develop.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 405-432
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The journalistic reaction to the first edition of The History of Stupidity in Poland. The historiographic pamphlets by Aleksander Bocheński
Recepcja publicystyczna Dziejów głupoty w Polsce. Pamfletów dziejopisarskich Aleksandra Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Orzełek, Ariel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/689250.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Aleksander Bocheński
historiografia
publicystyka
realizm polityczny
Aleksander Bochenski
historiography
journalism
political realism
Opis:
Dzieje głupoty w Polsce. Pamflety dziejopisarskie były najważniejszą publikacją Aleksandra Bocheńskiego. Stanowiły także jedną z najbardziej reprezentatywnych refleksji dla powojennego nurtu realizmu politycznego w Polsce. Recepcja publicystyczna pierwszego wydania tej książki w latach czterdziestych XX w. dowodziła niepopularności tez w niej zawartych. Krytyka insurekcyjnych nurtów polityki polskiej dokonana przez publicystę spotykała się ze sprzeciwem zarówno marksistów, bezpartyjnych intelektualistów w kraju, jak i środowisk emigracyjnych. Chociaż zazwyczaj rozumiano motywy koncepcji Bocheńskiego, odrzucano je jako: służące komunistom, sprzeczne z doktryną marksistowską bądź pozbawione fundamentu moralnego. Opinie te stanowią istotny przyczynek zapatrywań polskiej inteligencji na problematykę politycznego realizmu u progu Polski Ludowej.
The History of Stupidity in Poland. The historiographic pamphlets [Dzieje głupoty w Polsce. Pamflety dziejopisarskie] was the most important publication by Aleksander Bocheński. The book was also one of the most representative reflections on the post-war trend of political realism in Poland. The journalistic reaction to the first edition of the book in the forties of the 20th century proved that the theses included in it were highly unpopular. The author’s criticism of insurrection trends in Polish politics met with opposition from Marxists as well as non-party intellectuals, both at home and abroad. Although motives of Bocheński’s concepts were usually understood, they were rejected as they served communists, were contrary to Marxist doctrine or had no moral foundations. Those opinions constitute an important contribution to the views of Polish intelligentsia on political realism at the beginnings of the Polish People’s Republic.
Źródło:
Przegląd Nauk Historycznych; 2018, 17, 3; 205-225
1644-857X
2450-7660
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Nauk Historycznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Recepcja publicystyczna Dziejów głupoty w Polsce. Pamfletów dziejopisarskich Aleksandra Bocheńskiego
The journalistic reaction to the first edition of The History of Stupidity in Poland. The historiographic pamphlets by Aleksander Bocheński
Autorzy:
Orzełek, Ariel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/689606.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Aleksander Bocheński
historiografia
publicystyka
realizm polityczny
Aleksander Bochenski
historiography
journalism
political realism
Opis:
The History of Stupidity in Poland. The historiographical pamphlets was the most important publication by Aleksander Bocheński. It was also one of the most representative reflections on the postwar trend of political realism in Poland. The journalistic reception of the first edition of this book in the 1940s proved the unpopularity of the thesis included in its contents. Criticism of insurrection trends in the Polish politics by the author met with opposition from both Marxists, non-party intellectuals in the country and on the emigration. Although the motives of Bocheński’s concepts were usually understood, they were rejected because they: serve the communists, are contrary to the Marxist doctrine or have not any moral foundation. These opinions constitute an important contribution to the views of the Polish intelligentsia on the political realism at the threshold of the Polish People’s Republic.
Dzieje głupoty w Polsce. Pamflety dziejopisarskie były najważniejszą publikacją Aleksandra Bocheńskiego. Stanowiły także jedną z najbardziej reprezentatywnych refleksji dla powojennego nurtu realizmu politycznego w Polsce. Recepcja publicystyczna pierwszego wydania tej książki w latach czterdziestych XX w. dowodziła niepopularności tez w niej zawartych. Krytyka insurekcyjnych nurtów polityki polskiej dokonana przez publicystę spotykała się ze sprzeciwem zarówno marksistów, bezpartyjnych intelektualistów w kraju, jak i środowisk emigracyjnych. Chociaż zazwyczaj rozumiano motywy koncepcji Bocheńskiego, odrzucano je jako: służące komunistom, sprzeczne z doktryną marksistowską bądź pozbawione fundamentu moralnego. Opinie te stanowią istotny przyczynek zapatrywań polskiej inteligencji na problematykę politycznego realizmu u progu Polski Ludowej.
Źródło:
Przegląd Nauk Historycznych; 2018, 17, 2
1644-857X
2450-7660
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Nauk Historycznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„PIĄTA DROGA” ŚW. TOMASZA Z AKWINU W FORMALIZACJACH J.M. BOCHEŃSKIEGO I P. WEINGARTNERA
ST. THOMAS AQUINAS’ “FIFTH WAY” IN J.M. BOCHENSKI’S AND P. WEINGARTNER’S FORMALIZATIONS
Autorzy:
Porwolik, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373519.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
formalizacja
quinque viae
Bocheński
formalization
Opis:
The present state of research reveals that basically Fr. J.M. Bochenski (1902-1995) left three versions of the formalizations of St. Thomas Aquinas’ fifth way. The first version comes from the article Die fünf Wege, published in 1989, and the third one, which is unauthorized, from the book Gottes Dasein und Wesen. Logische Studien zur Summa Theologiae I, qq. 2-11, published in Munich in 2003. These works are completed by the second version from two manuscripts of the book: one German (1989) and one Polish (1993). The above mentioned texts have shown the contribution made by Fr. J.M. Bochenski into the realization of the intended application of the tools of contemporary logic in the field of philosophy of God as well as theology. One of the main followers of these ideas in Austria has been Paul Weingartner (born 1931). In 2010 he published God’s Existence? A Logical Commentary on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas, a book which makes direct references to J.M. Bochenski’s works, and like Bochenski’s work it is a logical commentary to certain fragments of St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae.
Obecny stan badań wskazuje, że formalizacje piątej drogi św. Tomasza z Akwinu pozostawił o. J. M. Bocheński (1902-1995) zasadniczo w trzech wersjach. Pierwsza z nich pochodzi z artykułu zatytułowanego Die fünf Wege z 1989 r., trzecia (nieautoryzowana) z książki Gottes Dasein und Wesen. Logische Studien zur Summa Theolgiae I, qq. 2-11 wydanej w Monachium w 2003 r. Uzupełnieniem tych opracowań stanowi wersja druga, pochodząca z manuskryptów książki: jeden w języku niemieckim (1989 r.), drugi w polskim (1993 r.). Publikacje te ukazują wkład jaki poczynił o. J. M. Bocheński w realizację zamierzenia stosowania narzędzi współczesnej logiki na terenie filozofii Boga i teologii. Jednym z głównych, współczesnych kontynuatorów tych idei w Austrii jest Paul Weingartner (ur. 1931 r.). W roku 2010 opublikował on książkę: God’s Existence? A Logical Commentary on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas, która w wielu miejscach nawiązuje wprost do prac J. M. Bocheńskiego i tak jak praca tego ostatniego jest komentarzem logicznym do pewnych fragmentów Sumy Teologicznej św. Tomasza z Akwinu.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2013, 61, 3; 77-99
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Patriotyzm w etyce tomistycznej
Patriotism in thomistic ethics
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Izabella
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078942.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
etyka tomistyczna
patriotyzm
J. Woroniecki
J.M. Bocheński
thomistic ethics
patriotism
J. M. Bocheński
Opis:
St. Thomas Aquinas did not actually take the subject of patriotism in his deliberations. However, in Summa theologiae he discussed the virtue of piety, which is expressed in love, and estimates love for one’s parents and one’s homeland. Thus, it can be concluded that for Thomas piety is patriotism. In the twentieth century, some followers of Aquinas undertook thoughts about patriotism. Significant studies of this topic are the texts of J.M. Bocheński and J. Woroniecki. In their texts they discuss such issues as: the essence of patriotism, patriotic education, difference between patriotism and chauvinism or nationalism. Woroniecki believed that the family is the first school of patriotism. Bocheński however, while developing the concept of patriotism in Woroniecki’s approach, focuses on the issue of education of a patriotic attitude. For this reason, in the educational process, he takes human powers: intellect, will and senses, into account and gives specific suggestions for their „cultivation”.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 229-239
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy pluralizm logiczny jest zabobonem? Na marginesie Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego uwag o zabobonach w logice
Is Logical Pluralism a Superstition? On Joseph Maria Bochenski’s Remarks about Superstitions in Logic
Autorzy:
Czernecka-Rej, Bożena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/488730.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
zabobon
Józef Maria Bocheński
pluralizm w logice
relatywizm
superstition
Józef Maria Bochenski
pluralism in logic
relativism
Opis:
Celem artykułu jest analiza Józefa M. Bocheńskiego zabobonów występujących w logice w odniesieniu do żywo współcześnie dyskutowanej w filozofii logiki problematyki pluralizmu logicznego. Koncentruję się na jednym zabobonie, nazwanym hasłowo „relatywizm w logice”, który pojawił się w związku z powstaniem nieklasycznych rachunków logicznych. Rozważam problem, czy pluralizm w logice, rozumiany jako współistnienie wielu (nieskończenie wielu) systemów logicznych, przekreśla jedność logiki i sprzeciwia się jej normatywnemu charakterowi oraz czy z tego faktu można wyprowadzić wniosek o relatywizmie w logice.
The aim of the article is to analyse Joseph M. Bochenski’s superstitions in logic with reference to issues of pluralism in logic, which is widely discussed in the contemporary philosophy of logic. I concentrate on a superstition known as “relativity in logic”. It emerged contemporarily with the construction of non-classical logical calculi. I make an attempt at considering logical pluralism in the sense of co-existence of infinitely numerous logical systems as ruling out the unity of logic and negating its normative nature. I also try to determine if it is possible to deduct relativity in logic from the fact of logical systems pluralism.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2016, 64, 2; 11-28
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bocheński Antoni (1910-1994) ps. "Marian" n.o. Andrzej Szczelik, ofic. rez. WP, ZWZ-AK, czł. org. "Ojczyzna", księgarz, wydawca
Autorzy:
Kraszewski, Piotr.
Bauer, Piotr (1944-2007).
Powiązania:
Encyklopedia konspiracji wielkopolskiej 1939-1945 / pod red. Mariana Woźniaka Poznań, 1998 S. 103-104
Współwytwórcy:
Woźniak, Marian. Redakcja
Data publikacji:
1998
Tematy:
Bocheński Antoni (1910-1994) biografia
Bocheński, Antoni
Łęgowski, Zygmunt
Ojczyzna (organizacja) biografie encyklopedia
Korpus Zachodni (KZ) biografie encyklopedia
Opis:
Oficer do Specjalnych Zleceń przy Dowódcy Korpusu ppłk. Zygmuncie Łęgowskim "Janusz", "Trzon". Uczestnik Powstania Warszawskiego. Jeniec obozu w fabryce "Wawer" pod Milanówkiem.
Bibliogr. s. 761-777.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aleksander Bocheński and his political realism: an outline
Aleksander Bocheński a realizm polityczny – zarys problemu
Autorzy:
Orzełek, Ariel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31002803.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
Aleksander Bocheński
myśl polityczna
publicystyka
realizm polityczny
Stowarzyszenie „PAX”
Aleksander Bochenski
journalism
PAX Association
political realism
political thouht
Opis:
Political realism is not easy to define. The analysis of specific cases may help. In this text, I wonder whether Aleksander Bocheński was a political realist. His journalism has undergone a significant evolution. He was a supporter of the Polish „power state” before 1939, he wanted to collaborate with the nazi Germans during the war years, and after the war he was an apologist for People's Poland and a critic of the Third Polish Republic. My considerations prove, that Bocheński was looking for political realism in his life and oeuvre, not always, however, entering this trend of reflection on politics.
Realizm polityczny jest pojęciem trudnym w definicji. Pomocna może być w tym przypadku analiza specyficznych przykładów. Niniejszy tekst dotyczy problemu realizmu w myśli politycznej Aleksandra Bocheńskiego. Wyrażana przez publicystykę, ulegała znamiennej ewolucji. Przed 1939 r. był on rzecznikiem Polski „mocarstwowej”, podczas wojny snuł plany kolaboracji z Niemcami, po 1945 r. był apologetą Polski Ludowej, broniąc jej także w III Rzeczypospolitej. Bocheński szukał politycznego realizmu, nie oznacza to jednak, że zawsze udało mu się pozostać w tym nurcie refleksji o polityce.
Źródło:
Folia Historica Cracoviensia; 2021, 27, 1; 85-110
0867-8294
Pojawia się w:
Folia Historica Cracoviensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozoficzna biografia Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966203.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef M. Bocheński
tomizm
logika
sowietologia
filozofia analityczna
Opis:
Józef Bocheński was born on 30th August 1902. He graduated from the Secondary School in 1920 and immediately after the final exam (matura) he joined the 8th Ulhan (light cavalry) Regiment and took part in a final part of a Polish-Bolshevik war. After the war, in 1922, he joined studies in law at the University of Lwów and after two years he attended the University in Poznań in order to study political economy. These studies were interrupted in 1926 when Bocheński joined the Seminary in Poznań which he left when moving to the Dominican novitiate in Cracow. There he adopted names Innocenty Maria. After one year of a novitiate he was sent to philosophical studies at the University in Fribourg in Swizerland, he graduated in 1934 . Two years earlier however, he was ordained a priest and in 1936, along with Jan Salamucha, Franciszek Drewnowski and Bolesław Sobociński, he organised the so called Cracow Circle. After receiving a doctorate in theology he was appointed a professor of logic at Angelicum, and he officially remained there until 1940. In 1938 he got habilitation in philosophy at the Faculty of Theology at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow. Along with the Polish Corpus of Gen. Władysław Anders he took part in the Italian campaigne. He fought in the battle at Monte Cassino (May 1944). After the end of the Second World War he became a professor of philosophy at Fribourg University and remained at that position until the retirement (1945-1972). He occupied a position of a Dean of Faculty of Philosophy (1950-1952) and a Rector. There he initiated soviet studies which brought him recognition and political significance. He visited Poland in 1987 for the first time since he left in 1939. In the next year he was awarded doctorates honoris causa at the Jagiellonian University and at the Academy of Catholic Theology (ATK) in Warsaw. Moreover, during his emigration he co-operated regularly with the Polish University Abroad established in Londyn. He died in Fribourg on 8th February 1995. During his lifetime Józef Bocheński was changing philosopical schools and views. In his youth he was a Kantian, next, he „converted” to neo-Thomism in its most traditional (handbook and essential) version, which actually was more Aristotelian than Thomistic. The next step was an attempt to „modernise” this sort of Thomism by tools of mathematical logic in order to make Thomas - as Bocheński said himself - no longer his „guru”. In the result, Bocheński ceased to explore the problems and style of classical philosophy in favour of analytical mode of philosophying. He himself divided his scientific work into four periods distinguished as follows, according to interest and passions (and views as well) dominated in particular time: 1) neo-Thomistic (1934–1940), 2) historical- logical (1945–1955) 3) sovietological (1955–1970) 4) systematical- logical (1970–1995).
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 245-264
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozofia ekonomii Józefa Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Łazarski, Adrian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966189.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
filozofia ekonomii
teoria firmy
teoria przedsiębiorczości
o. Józef M. Bocheński
Philosophy Of Economics
Theory Of Firm
Entrepreneurship Theory
Fr. Joseph M. Bocheński
Opis:
Fr. Józef Maria Bocheński, known for his many contributions, is not usually associated with the philosophy of economics, even though he had some achivements in this field. The classical analysis of the enterprise, limited to the division into capital, land, and labor, as a sociological-historical rather than an economic concept, does not contribute much to the study of economics, so Bocheń-ski’s analysis using ontological and logical tools is an attempt to remedy this. The analysis of the enterprise shows that it is a system which purpose is production. This system consists of internal and external elements and a synthesis factor in the form of the entrepreneur, who may be identical with with one or more of these elements or with none of them. As the dynamic analysis shows, the various subsystems of the enterprise may have divergent objectives, but they must be subordinated to the main objective, which is production, otherwise no objective will be fulfilled. From the work as a whole, the ideal of the entrepreneur emerges, reconciling the conflicting aspirations of the individual components of the system. These considerations provide an ontological ground for deliberation of the theory of the firm and the theory of entrepreneurship, showing the connection between these two issues. Bochenski’s work generates numerous problems of a detailed nature, mainly in the selection and number of elements, and needs to be supplemented with a theory of the boundaries of the firm.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 371-383
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Teologia jako nauka formalna
Theology as a Formal Science
Autorzy:
Remisiewicz, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1622269.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
theology
formal sciences
Bocheński
eidetic meaning
operative meaning
philosophy of science
sens operacyjny
sens ejdetyczny
bocheński
nauki formalne
teologia
filozofia nauki
Opis:
Among philosophers of science there are a lot of views about nature of theology in relate to others disciplines. In the article author defends an account according to which theology is a formal science. Firstly he introduces two necessary features of science: semantic exclusivity and practical egalitarianism. Next he examines theological definitions of theology and using Bocheński’s meaning partition he indicates that matter of theology has operative meaning, but not eidetic. In the face of this difficulty, author shows examples of theological researches and exposes its schemes. Furthermore, he presents a final conclusion that theological researches are nothing more than establishing mutual relations between a finite number of terms, in other words the creation of some new conceptual schemes that would be syntactically coherent and logically consistent with other, previously approved, conceptual schemes. Finally he indicates how theology bases on four kinds of rules of sentences’ transformation: rule of syntactic, sources, conclusion-formulating and assigning the truthfulness.
Źródło:
Analiza i Egzystencja; 2015, 32; 113-142
1734-9923
2300-7621
Pojawia się w:
Analiza i Egzystencja
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozoficzne aspekty człowieczeństwa w ujęciu J.M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Izabella
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
antropologia filozoficzna
człowieczeństwo
humanizm
Józef Bocheński
antropological philosophy
humanity
humanism
Opis:
The content of the article concerns the philosophical views of the famous Dominican J. Bocheński on the structure of human existence. Bocheński himself divided his work into the neo-romantic and analytical periods. The article uses this division and focuses more on Bocheński’s later philosophical views. One of the reasons was that his neotomistic anthropological views had already been discussed in the book K. Policki, entitled: The philosophy of man in the early work of J.I.M. Bocheński. The presented article presents the structural elements of man, along with his powers. Then it deals with topics related to humanity. That is why the following parts of the paper are devoted to various areas of human activity and humanism. It seems that despite the changes in his philosophical views declared by Bocheński, he still remained an Aristotelian. It is manifested in the way of perceiving man from the perspective of his essence and accepting the spiritual and body unity. Moreover, Bocheński adopts the hegemony of the intellect in human activities (despite the declaration that, according to him, man does not differ from an animal). Since Bocheński readily expressed mutually exclusive views, it should be emphasized that establishing his position on the metaphysical structure of man is not an easy task.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 291-300
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józef M. Bocheński jako tomista
Autorzy:
Zembrzuski, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966205.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
J.M. Bocheński
filozofia tomistyczna w Polsce
Opis:
The aim of the paper is to present the following, how Thomism was understood by Bocheński, next, path of Thomistic inspirations he had followed, and finally we show Thomism Bocheński had explored when teaching his own philosophical abbreviation (ABC tomizmu). Analysis based on these issues would allow to identify the specific features of Thomism studied and explored by Bocheński. Hence, the question we might pose does not to regard the fact whether Bocheński was a Thomist or not but, what sort of Thomism he represented. Bocheński should rather be considered to be a traditional Thomist than existential one because in his philosophical work he barely treated the problem of act of existence and importance of this particular problem. However, he refrained from adopting the method fundamental for traditional Thomism, which is strict adherence (fidelity) to source texts of Aquinas. Bocheński, in being open to achievements of contemporary philosophy, especially logic, was closer to Louvain Thomism. But, he never decided to implement modern scientific trends to philosophy of Aquinas, the tendency which was foreign to the very essence of philosophy, at least in its shape understood by Bocheński. In his philosophical views Bocheński was closer to Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. And because he preferred to follow Aristotelian realism he consequently kept that stance. His interest in analysis the utterances of Thomism from a perspective of logic allow to classify Bocheński to analytical Thomism, but we should remember that in times contemporary to Bocheński, the very notion of analytical Thomism had not been coined. The aforementioned conclusions allow to recognize originality of Thomistic thought represented by Bocheński and also, to admit that Bocheński’s thought cannot be classified univocally to a particular school of Thomism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 265-289
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 58

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies