Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "European interest" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Usługi użyteczności publicznej jako instrument inwestowania w długoterminowe zdolności rozwojowe i globalną konkurencyjność Unii Europejskiej
Services of general interest as an instrument to invest in a long-term development capabilities and global competitiveness of the EU
Autorzy:
Ząbkowicz, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/570006.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
services of general interest
Lisbon Strategy
Europe 2020
European Union
competitiveness
Opis:
The 2004 White Paper on SGI, which is a summary of the debate on the European model of society, defines services of general interest as a fundamental factor for ensuring social and territorial cohesion and the competitiveness of the EU economy. Thus, the paper clearly emphasizes the role of public services in pursuit of the Union to achieve its strategic goal set by the European Council summit in Lisbon in 2000 – making the EU economy the most competitive and dynamic economy in the world, based on knowledge and capable of sustainable economic growth. Such a location of public services in the EU’s body shows a gradual evolution taking place in the hierarchy of tasks assigned to them. Previously, access to public services was assessed in the first place as an essential element of European citizenship, essential to the full enjoyment of fundamental rights. Currently – without detracting from the above role – perception of public services as a strategic instrument to invest in long-term development capabilities and the global competitiveness of the EU is becoming increasingly important. The aim of this article is to draw attention to the process of re-evaluation of the hierarchy of tasks assigned to SGI in the Union and, against this background, an indication of the differences in the approaches of the EU institutions and public authorities of the Member States. The resulting key question is whether the EU has already achieved consensus on the recognition of the development of public services as a condition of its global competitiveness? The starting point of the analysis are the priorities indicated in the Lisbon Strategy and the ”Europe 2020” strategy.
Źródło:
Ekonomia XXI Wieku; 2016, 2 (10); 103-120
2353-8929
Pojawia się w:
Ekonomia XXI Wieku
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Podejście sektorowe i horyzontalne jako instrumenty integracji regionalnej – na przykładzie sfery rynkowych usług użyteczności publicznej w Unii Euro
Horizontal and sectoral approaches as instruments of regional integration. a case study of services of general economic interest in the EU
Autorzy:
Ząbkowicz, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/570158.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
regional integration
horizontal approach
sectoral approach
services of general interest
European Union
Opis:
The two possible broad EU legislative approaches to achieving more harmonization between Member States are a series of sector-specific directives, or what is called a “horizontal framework Directive” which sets out broad framework principles which apply to all the areas within its scope. The European Commission expresses full conviction that EU legislation must rely to much greater extend on a horizontal approach applying across all sectors as the one giving fresh impetus to regional integration. However, almost all Commission’s decisions to propose a horizontal directive meet with a mixed (or even negative) reception in the Parliament and in Member States as in their opinion a sector-specific legislation better complies with procedures and practices in each country and keeps alive diversity in the Union. Diverging views in the EU about the above approaches and problems with finding a consensus are well reflected in the sector of services of general economic interest being essential for ensuring social and territorial cohesion and for the competitiveness of the European economy. The organization of these services varies according to cultural traditions, the history and geographical conditions of each Member State and the characteristics of the activity concerned. In the common opinion of authorities of Member States the existing sector-specific EU rules take due account of the diversity that characterizes different services of general interest and the situations in which they are provided. They support such an approach as a right way to respect the roles of national, regional and local authorities in ensuring the well-being of their citizens and in guaranteeing democratic choices. The added value of a horizontal framework as compared to the sector-specific approach followed so far has not been demonstrated, they say. That means there is no reason to bestow the European Commission with additional powers. The powers currently conferred on the Community with regard to services of general interest are appropriate and sufficient in order to ensure that well-functioning services can be maintained and developed throughout the Union. According to the European Commission consolidation of the Community acquis should be based on common elements of existing sector-specific legislation. Without prejudice to these rules, a horizontal approach will be considered with regard to a number of specific issues, such as consumers’ interests, the monitoring and evaluation of services of general interest, the application of state aid rules to financial compensation or the use of structural funds for the support of services of general interest. That would help to ensure overall consistency of approach across different services of general interest sectors. As a framework instrument as a basis setting out common objectives and principles would be general in nature and would also have its limitations it should be complemented by sector-specific legislation laying down more
Źródło:
Ekonomia XXI Wieku; 2014, 2(2); 45-64
2353-8929
Pojawia się w:
Ekonomia XXI Wieku
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Liberalizacja w Unii Europejskiej i nie rozwiązany euckenowski dylemat
Economic liberalisation in European Union and Euckens dilemma
Autorzy:
Ząbkowicz, Anna
Ząbkowicz, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/955771.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
European regulatory framework
universal services of general interest
rent seeking
regulacje europejskie
powszechne usługi użyteczności publicznej
poszukiwanie renty
Opis:
Na wstępie artykułu wykazano, że liberalizacyjna misja Unii Europejskiej jest złożona. Jednym z problemów zastanych jest przyzwolenie przez państwa członkowskie na koncentrację siły ekonomicznej lub wręcz ochrona grup dominujących w gospodarce. W części drugiej nawiązano do opinii Waltera Euckena, zgodnie z którą ta skłonność państwa kapitalistycznego stanowiła fundamentalny problem budowy ustroju opartego na konkurencji, który jednak mogło rozwiązać tylko państwo. Owo zapętlenie nazywano euckenowskim dylematem i postawiono pytanie, czy nadzór ponadnarodowych organów Unii Europejskiej współcześnie tworzy szanse na rozbijanie układu między państwem narodowym a rodzimymi monopolami. Część trzecią oparto na praktycznych doświadczeniach krajów członkowskich Unii Europejskiej i dotyczy ona sfery usług użyteczności publicznej, której specyfika sprzyja tego typu związkom między państwem a biznesem, odnosząc się do zasad unijnych. Ów przegląd zakończono wnioskiem, że Unia, występująca w roli orędownika wspólnego jednolitego rynku, nie wydaje się gotowa na konfrontację z wielkimi firmami z sektorów sieciowych ani wspierającymi „swoje” firmy państwami. Tak długo, jak będzie na to za słaba lub nie dość zdeterminowana, głoszona przez nią zasada konkurencji w sensie euckenowskim będzie w dalszym ciągu należeć do przyszłości.
The paper begins with a discussion of the complexity of EU's liberalisation mission. Among the problems faced is the fact that member-states have long tolerated the concentration of economic power, or even protected the interests of the dominant economic entities. In the second section, the author refers to Walter Eucken's observation that this feature of the capitalist state constituted a major barrier to a competitive market, which could be eradicated exclusively by the state itself. This trade off has been referred to as Eucken's dilemma. The central question is whether the supervision of supra-national institutions of the EU is capable of severing the ties between the national state and the domestic monopolies. Section three examines the evidence from the field of services of general economic interest, where these ties are extremely strong. The review concludes that, in spite of its programme for the promotion of a common unified market, the European Union is not in a position to confront large businesses from the network industries, or the states which provide support for them. As long as the EU is too weak or too hesitant, the idea of the competitive order, the Eucken' s heritage, is unlikely to become a reality.
Źródło:
Optimum. Economic Studies; 2015, 1(73); 40-50
1506-7637
Pojawia się w:
Optimum. Economic Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies