Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "historia Kościoła" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Paweł z Konstantynopola - kariera biskupa.
Autorzy:
Wnętrzak, Teresa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436612.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Paweł z Konstantynopola
biskup
historia Kościoła
Opis:
The career of bishop Paul of Constantinople dates back to the period of Arian  controversy,so difficult for the Church, and was associated with the politics conducted by the successorsof Constantine towards the Church. After Alexander, the previous bishop, died, the Churchof Constantinople faced a conflict between two candidates to the Episcopal see, Paul andMacedonius. Emperor Constantius, dissatisfied with both candidates, let the synod offer thesee to Eusebius, the bishop of Nicomedia, a follower of Arius. The procedure was not compliantwith the canon, as it was a translation, the second one in the case of Eusebius. Paul replacedAlexander in the summer of 337, yet the synod deposed him in the autumn. He was banishedto Pont, from where he returned after his successor’s death in 341. The followers of Nicaeareintroduced him to the see, while the Arians again chose Macedonius. Constantinople becamea scene of fights and riots. Constantius ordered Hermogenes, his magister equitum,to removePaul by force and to stop the riots. The attempt of violent action against Paul provoked thepeople to murder Hermogenes. The Emperor arrived to Constantinople in person, punishedthe citizens with reduction of their allowance of corn, and banished Paul again, which  tookplace in 342. Paul returned after the synod of Serdica, at which the bishops (of the West) restored him to his see. On receiving the news, Emperor Constantius became enraged and sentan order to Philippus, prefect of the East, to remove Paul from the Church and to introduceMacedonius. Fearing another rebellion, Philippus set a trap, inviting Paul to a public bathand arresting him there. The bishop was placed on board of a ship, prepared earlier, andimmediately sent away. Thus Bishop Paul was deposed and banished from Constantinople for the third time; it took place before July 344. He was sent to Thessalonica, which he soonleft for Italy. In the spring of 345 he appeared at the court of Constans and presented his situation. Owing to Constans’ intervention at the throne of the ruler of the East, Constantius,he regained the Episcopal see in 346. This forced state of approval lasted until 350, when the Emperor again ordered Paul’s deposition and banishment. Sent to Cucusus in Armenia, Paul died, probably secretly murdered. This was done with the Emperor being aware of it: Paulwas a difficult case, persistently fighting for his see against the Emperor’s dislike and the opposition of the clergy. Constantius saw him not only as a theological opponent, but also as a source of dangerous disorder.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2011, 10; 21-33
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
konflikty między biskupami Wschodu po soborze w Nicei.
Autorzy:
Wnętrzak, Teresa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436228.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
sobór w Nicei
Konstantyn Wielki
spory religijne
historia Kościoła
Opis:
The Concil of Nicaea did not the Church the expected peace. The first satge of the long period of concil lasted until the death of emporer Constantine in 337. At that time, we witnes a reaction a gainst the arrangements made in Nicaea. While Constantine was still alive, the Nicene Creed was sacred and untouchable, but the suporters of Arianism managed to remove and banish theit main opponents: Athanasius, Eustachius of Antioch and Marcelius of Ancyra. One of the methods of removing inconvenient bishops was charging then with immorality, an example of with is the case of Eustachius, deposed by the synod in Antioch. According to the historian of the Cuurch, Sozomenus, the problem was Eustachius' engagement in the defence of the Nicene Cread and his uncompromising attitude towards the supporters of the Arian heresy, while the official pretext was the charge of disgracing the dignity of a bishop. The same synod ion Antioch deposed other five bishops and replaced them with those approved by the Arian faction. The conflict inside the Church was the most severe in Egypt, where the bishop of Alexandria was Athanasius. The situation in this country was complicated by the overlap of two conflicts the Arian heresy and the Melrtian schism. Athanasius had to face then both. The Meletians accused him of violence against them, barring them from churches and persecuting their leaders. the historians of the Church, socrates and sozomenus claim that these were allegations and that such violations were not proven. Athanasius was called before the synod twice: first to Caesarea (in 334), buthe refused to leave Alexandria, and then to Tyre (in 335), when he had to appear before the judges. The synod was organized by Eusebius of Caesarea, and it gathered pro-Arian bishop. When the emperor was informed that Athanasius threatened to arrest the fleet transporting grain to Constantinopole in the port of Alexandria, he exiled the bishop to Trier. It may be concluded that the Concil of Nicaea the Arian faction changed the meth ods of fighting their opponents: avoiding complex theological problems, they brought up legal, moral or political charges against them. Most of activity was devoted to the rehabilitation of Arius and to the fight against Athanasius. The emperor, who was neutral at the beginning of the Arian controversy, remained neutral during the Concil and afterwards. Even if his attitude may be considered unfavourable to Athanasius, it did not result from the sympathy for Arianism, but from the fact that the bishop of Alexandria become of an incessant conflict inside the Church.
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2008, 7; 13-32
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konastntyn Wielki na soborze w Nicei według relacji Euzebiusza z Cezarei w "Vita Constantini".
Autorzy:
Wnętrzak, Teresa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/436811.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
sobor w Nicei w 325 r.
historia Kościoła
Konstantyn Wielki
Opis:
This article presents the influence Constantine the Great had over the proceedings of the Ecumenical Concil of Nicaea in 325, based on the biography composed by Eusebius of Caesarea in his "Life of Constantine". These are the first epiodes of the full text, whichup till now has been translated into Polish, being dealt with me. The assembling of the Nicaae Concil was affected by the ideology of unity - the  church and the empore were to be ecumenical, Catholic and united. Constantine was determined to restore peace in the Church and sincerely concerned himself with the re-establishment of religious peace. The emporer did not any side of the conflict and persuaded to reach a compromise at any expense. He did not try to influence formulating the Profession of Faith (the creed) as he was not acquainted with teological matters, however, he did contribute to accepting the formula by the participating bishops. According to Eusebius, Constantine was successful in achieving his aims. Constantine aimed for Christian unity as he found it as basic requirement for a powerful empire. The power was to be given by God - how could he then belive that the quarreling Christians or offending heretics would enjoy the grace of God ? While at the same time, the emperor who did not do his duty in God's way wuuld lack. His support for victories and successful dealing with domestic affairs.sobór w Nicei 325
Źródło:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne; 2007, 6; 3-10
2450-4475
Pojawia się w:
Res Gestae. Czasopismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies