Autor: Richter, Piotr - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Checklist in colorectal surgery – proposal of experts of the Polish Club of Coloproctology and National Consultant in general surgery
Autorzy:: Banasiewicz, Tomasz
Krokowicz, Łukasz
Richter, Piotr
Dziki, Adam
Krokowicz, Piotr
Lorenc, Zbigniew
Szczepkowski, Marek
Drews, Michał
Wallner, Grzegorz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1393115.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: Checklist
colorectal surgery
surgical complications
Opis:: A checklist is a collection of information that helps reduce the risk of failure due to limitations in human memory and attention. In surgery, the first Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), created under the supervision of WHO (World Health Organization), was established in 2007 and covers three stages related to the patient's stay in the operating theater and operation: 1. Prior to initiation (induction) of anesthesia; 2. before cutting the skin; 3. before the patient leaves the operating room Colorectal surgery is particularly at high risk for complications and relatively high mortality. Elimination or, more likely, reducing the risk of complications by standardizing perioperative procedures may be particularly important in this group. The introduction of "dedicated" colorectal checklist surgery seems to be justified. The checklist proposed by the authors in colorectal surgery is divided into four stages, in which conscientious completion of checklists is intended to reduce the potential risk of complications due to hospitalization and surgical treatment. The presented checklist is obviously not closed, as a new publications or recommendations appear, some points may be modified, new issues may be added to the checklist. At present, however, it is a tool considering the well-known and confirmed elements of intraoperative procedures, the compliance of which may significantly reduce the rate of adverse events or surgical complications.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2017, 89, 6; 44-49
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Postoperative pain relief in general surgery – recommendations of the Association of Polish Surgeons, Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Polish Association for the Study of Pain and Polish Association of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Treatment
Autorzy:: Wordliczek, Jerzy
Zajączkowska, Renata
Dziki, Adam
Jackowski, Marek
Richter, Piotr
Woroń, Jarosław
Misiołek, Hanna
Dobrogowski, Jan
Paśnik, Krzysztof
Wallner, Grzegorz
Malec-Milewska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1392367.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: recommendations
pain
pain treatment
pharmacotherapy
general surgery
perioperative procedures
Opis:: It is estimated that there are over 310 million surgeries performed in the world every year. Appropriate analgesic management in the perioperative period constitutes a fundamental right of every patient, significantly reducing the number of postoperative complications and the time and costs of hospitalization, particularly in the high-risk group of patients (ASA III-V) subject to extensive surgical procedures and hospitalized in intensive care units. Despite such significant arguments speaking for the conduct of effective analgesia in the perioperative period, nearly 79% of patients operated in hospitalization settings and 71% of patients operated in outpatient settings (so-called first day surgery) experienced postoperative pain of moderate, strong or extreme intensity. Hence, effective relief of postoperative pain should constitute one of the priorities of integrated, modern perioperative management, the components of which apart from adequate analgesia involve early nutrition through the alimentary canal, early patient activation and active physiotherapy. In the currently published “Guidelines”, a team of authors has updated the previous “Recommendations” primarily in terms of methods for optimizing postoperative pain relief and new techniques and drugs introduced for postoperative pain therapy in recent years. The algorithms of postoperative pain management in different treatment categories were also updated.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2019, 91, 1; 47-68
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer; update 2017
Autorzy:: Kulig, Jan
Wallner, Grzegorz
Drews, Michał
Frączek, Mariusz
Jeziorski, Arkadiusz
Kielan, Wojciech
Kołodziejczyk, Piotr
Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna
Starzyńska, Teresa
Zinkiewicz, Krzysztof
Wojtukiewicz, Marek
Skoczylas, W. Tomasz
Richter, Piotr
Krawczyk, Marek
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1393313.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: Gastric Cancer
Helicobacter pylori
Laparotomy
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Immunohistochemistry
Surgical treatment
Panendoscopy
Biopsy
Opis:: The “Polish Research on Gastric Cancer” project has been continued since 1986. The main aim of this project, which is a multicenter and interdisciplinary research, is enhancing the treatment results of gastric cancer patients by developing and promoting the use of optimal methods for diagnosis and treatment, both surgical as well as combined. One of the more important achievements of the project is the development and publication of a document named “Polish Consensus on Treatment of Patients with Gastric Cancer”, whose first version was published in 1998. Following versions were updated adequately to changing trends in the proceedings in patients with gastric cancer. A scientific symposium on “Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer – update 2016” was held in 3-4 June 2016 in Cracow. During the symposium a panel session was held during which all authors publicly presented the Consensus assumptions to be discussed further. Moreover, the already mentioned session was preceded by a correspondence as well as a working meeting in order to consolidate the position. It has to be underlined that the directions and guidelines included in the Consensus are not the arbitrarily assumed rules of conduct in a legal aspect and as such every doctor/team of doctors is entitled to make different decisions as long as they are beneficial to a patient with gastric cancer. The Consensus discusses as follows: a) recommended qualifications (stage of advancement, pathological, lymph node topography and the extent of lymphadenectomy, division of cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), b) rules for diagnostics including recommendations regarding endoscopic examination and clinical evaluation of the advancement stage, c) recommendations regarding surgical treatment (extent of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, tactics of proceedings in cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), d) recommendations regarding combined treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, e) place of endoscopic and less invasive surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer. This publication is a summary of the arrangements made in the panel session during the abovementioned scientific symposium in Cracow in 2016.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2017, 89, 5; 59-73
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Guidelines of the Association of Polish Surgeons and the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology on the accreditation of healthcare centers providing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for primary and secondary peritoneal cancers
Autorzy:: Jastrzębski, Tomasz
Richter, Piotr
Zegarski, Wojciech
Dziki, Adam
Wallner, Grzegorz
Jeziorski, Arkadiusz
Wysocki, Wojciech
Jackowski, Marek
Bębenek, Marek
Olesiński, Tomasz
Polkowski, Wojciech
Wyrwicz, Lucjan
Wydra, Dariusz
Biernat, Wojciech
Czauderna, Piotr
Studniarek, Michał
Polec, Tomasz
Owczuk, Radosław
Sommer, Anna
Szewczyk, Krzysztof
Mielko, Jerzy
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1391728.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: accreditation
cytoreduction
HIPEC
peritoneal cancer
quality of treatment
Opis:: Surgical interventions in patients with peritoneal metastases combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and systemic treatment are becoming more common and, when applied to selected patient groups, they reach 5-year survival rates of 32–52%. Good clinical outcomes require experienced and well-equipped healthcare centers, experienced surgical team and adequate patient qualification process. As a result of the discussion on the need for evaluation of quality of care and treatment outcomes and at the request of the Peritoneal Cancer Section of the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology, accreditation standards have been developed and the Accreditation Committee has been established for healthcare centers providing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the management of primary and secondary peritoneal cancers.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2020, 92, 4; 47-53
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki