Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "conceptual terminology" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Feldmarszałek porucznik czy generał dywizji? Przekład nazw austro-węgierskich stopni wojskowych
    Feldmarszałek porucznik (Lieutenant Field Marshal) or generał dywizji (Major General)Translating Austro-Hungarian Military Rank Names into Polish
    Autorzy:
    Włoskowicz, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/463183.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Lingwistyki Stosowanej
    Tematy:
    translation
    term
    terminology
    rank
    army
    military
    conceptual field
    conceptual system
    Austria-Hungary
    Opis:
    The lack of Polish fixed equivalents of Austro-Hungarian military rank names is caused by the fact that these terms are culture-bound elements that belong to the historical legal reality and by the incongruence of A-H and Polish (conceptual) military rank systems. This lack leaves a great multitude of possible solu-tions. In the article the compared systems of military ranks are perceived as systems of concepts and ana-lyzed in terms of Jost Trier’s lexical field theory. This approach is supported with some examples of monolingual dictionary definitions of military ranks that are clearly based on an item’s relations within a field. Despite some etymological parallels between A-H and Polish military rank names the systems they constitute belong to different “traditions” of military terminology — respectively to the German and French — which is to be observed mainly in the names of general ranks. Being bilateral signs, the rank names allow different translation solutions that constitute a continuum spread between two poles: a formal and a conceptual one that are analogous to the poles of formal and dynamic (conceptual) equivalence. The first one is achieved mainly by calques or loan translations whereas the latter by using ranks with similar position within the system.
    Źródło:
    Lingwistyka Stosowana / Applied Linguistics / Angewandte Linguistik; 2015, 13; 103-111
    2080-4814
    Pojawia się w:
    Lingwistyka Stosowana / Applied Linguistics / Angewandte Linguistik
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    On Concepts, Conceptual Systems and Terminology of Onomastics
    O pojęciach, systemach pojęciowych i terminologii onomastycznej
    Autorzy:
    Włoskowicz, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1928188.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-11-10
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN
    Tematy:
    pojęcie
    system pojęciowy
    terminologia
    standaryzacja
    concept
    conceptual system
    terminology
    standarization
    Opis:
    On Concepts, Conceptual Systems and Terminology of OnomasticsThe main aim of this paper is to propose a terminological approach to the standardization of onomastic terminology. Attention is paid to the primary importance of conceptual systems and to the onomasiological approach typical of terminological work. Terminology is presented as a discipline devoted primarily to the study of concepts. Then the main concepts of terminology are discussed and the relations between a conceptual system and a terminological system are explained. An outline of the issue of conceptual systems of onomastics and of their internal structure is made. Then two important metatheoretical concepts are introduced and defined: 1) the concept of theoretical legitimacy of concepts and 2) the concept of economy of conceptual systems. In the final part of the article, several suggestions concerning the standardization of onomastic terminology are made: 1) terms referring to concepts belonging to separate conceptual series are not to be used interchangeably; 2) terms based on different roots (in the English onomastic terminology: -onym, -onymy, -onomastics, in the Polish terminology: -onim, -onimia, -onomastyka) are to be reserved respectively for the concept of a single (type of) proper name, for the concept of a set of proper names and for the concept of a specific onomastic discipline; 3) concepts used or newly introduced in a text are to be defined clearly in onomastic works, 4) onomasticians aiming for standardization of onomastic terminology should start their work by (re)constructing conceptual system(s) of onomastics and only then assign terms to concepts; 5) one completely unitary conceptual (and terminological) system of onomastics cannot be achieved due to the theoretical pluralism of the discipline; 6) the first goal of any conceptual and terminological standardization of onomastics is to define its range: should the standardization cover the concepts of philological or general onomastics? should it cover only empirical (descriptive) concepts or highly abstract theoretical concepts as well?
    Źródło:
    Onomastica; 2018, 62; 73-98
    0078-4648
    Pojawia się w:
    Onomastica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies