Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "predicate‑argument structure" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Die polnische Wortbildungsterminologie im Vergleich mit der deutschen
Autorzy:
Stopyra, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/504780.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
predicate-argument structure
derivative
compound
suffix
descriptive models
Opis:
The article discusses the model classifying German motivated words that takes its origin in the work of Fillmore entitled "The Case for Case" (1968) and is used by Hans Wellmann in his description of German word formation processes in 1984-1998 (Duden. Die Grammatik, Band 4). The model stands in agreement with the rule of assigning the semantic roles to individual parts of the sentence, which was formulated in German language by Wolfgang Motsch (2004). Renata Grzegorczykowa and Jadwiga Puzynina used the same rule in Polish word formation in their „Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia.” (1999). Each time, the model classifies the derivative words with reference to their semantic role and the motivating part of the explicatory paraphrase. Such derivatives may be, at the same time, classified according to their suiffxes. In the case of compounds and case government structures that are motivated by the functioning in the particular language verbal phrase, the motivational aspect comes from the particular verbal phrase (used as an explicating paraphrase) – its motivational argument and reference argument. The latter one belongs to the verb case government present in the explicating phrase and is added to the compound on its left side. The model described in the article is also used in order to describe the Danish derivatives which appear as equivalents of German words in the literary translations.
Źródło:
Academic Journal of Modern Philology; 2012, 1; 119-127
2299-7164
2353-3218
Pojawia się w:
Academic Journal of Modern Philology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Das Beschreibungsmodell deutscher und dänischer Derivate nach ihrer Prädikat-Argumentstruktur
The Classification Model of German and Danish Derivatives According to Their Predicate-Argument Structure
Autorzy:
Stopyra, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/504706.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
German and Danish derivatives
predicate-argument structure
systemic traits of vocabulary
word formation system
Opis:
The following article seeks to present the model of classification of German derivatives which can be traced to both Fillmore’s The Case for Case (1968) and the German formative description proposed by Hans Wellmann from 1984 to 1998 (Duden. Die Grammatik, Band 4). The model seems to remain in conformity with the rule of aligning semantic fields to particular parts of sentences. The particular rule applied for German language was formulated by Wolfgang Motsch (2004). Renata Grzegorczykowa and Jadwiga Puzynina (1999) applied the rule in their analysis of the Polish word formation system. The fundamental role of the model is to classify each and every occurrence of the derivatives in accordance to both their semantic role and the directly motivating sentence segment of an explicative phrase. Derivatives set in such classes can be additionally classified in accordance to the specifi ed suffixes. The discussed model allows systemizing the results of word formation of a particular language. The model enables distinguishing systemic traits of vocabulary, therefore providing the learner with a specific overview and a greater degree of transparency. While considering German and Danish languages, it can be concluded that the Danish word formation system remains in conformity with its German counterpart and is equally complicated in its nature. Danish derivational translating equivalents comprise 65% of Danish equivalents in the following study.
Źródło:
Academic Journal of Modern Philology; 2013, 2; 145-152
2299-7164
2353-3218
Pojawia się w:
Academic Journal of Modern Philology
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies