Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Philosophy of economics" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Rozwój teorii ekonomii po kryzysie. Rewolucja czy ewolucja?
    Developement of Economic Theory after Crisis. Revolution or Evolution?
    Autorzy:
    Scheuer, Bartosz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/586436.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Ekonomiści
    Filozofia ekonomii
    Teoria ekonomii
    Economic theory
    Economists
    Philosophy of economics
    Opis:
    The current economic crisis leads to reflection on the state of economic theory. There is a very popular view, that some kind of radical change of the current paradigm is desirable. In this article, this thesis is negated. Analysis of two main theoretical approaches shows that the crisis has not undermined the stability of any of them. Both, supporters of Keynesian-rooted theories and followers of Chicago school's ideas, recognize events of recent years for empirical evidence supporting their theories. The main reason for this is that what is considered as economic facts, it is created along with theories and is usually coherent with them.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ekonomiczne; 2013, 129; 11-18
    2083-8611
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ekonomiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O realistyczności założeń, falsyfikowalności hipotez i innych modernistycznych mitach współczesnej ekonomii
    The realism of assumptions, falsifiability of hypotheses and other modernist myths of contemporary economics
    Autorzy:
    Scheuer, Bartosz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/434729.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
    Tematy:
    methodology of economics
    philosophy of science
    economic crisis
    ontological realism
    modernism
    Opis:
    In the face of the global economic crisis, there are many opinions according to which economics as a science needs major rebuilding. Usually, it is emphasized that it should not be developed by involving the construction of formal, mathematical models but that there is a need to improve the “realisticness” of analysis. Based on the analysis of a dispute between P. Krugman and J.H. Cochrane it can be said that the arguments which appear during the debate on the crisis are not new and confusingly similar to those that already appeared in the 30s and 70s of the last century. It should also be noted that both: the supporters of “realisticness” of economic analysis, as well as representatives of the mainstream formalism treat this crisis as a confirmation of the correctness of their theories and evidence of the weakness of the concepts proposed by their opponents. The article is placed in relation to the thesis that all the arguments that have emerged in the debate on the state of the economic theory after the crisis, contrary to appearances, do not bring anything new to the economic discourse and cannot lead to any solutions of the theoretical dispute, because all arguments are based on the same philosophical foundations. In other words it can be said that the basic problem of modern economics should not be considered as a weakness of theory, but as a weakness of philosophy common to all participants of the discourse. First of all, in fact, the arguments coming from both sides of the dispute seem to assume that the ultimate and decisive test of any theory is its confrontation with experience, the “facts”, whereby the test is perceived in terms of the correspondence theory of truth. This means that both: economists, whose views on the nature of the theory are similar to those presented by P. Krugman, as well as their opponents, who, like J.H. Cochrane recognize that any theoretical concepts should meet fairly strict formal requirements and finally take the form of (usually mathematicised) model, assume that carrying out such a test is possible firstly, and secondly, that it boils down to a comparison of propositions that make up the model/theory (assumptions and predictions, or only prediction) with the reality whose components are independent of theory and processes of cognition.
    Źródło:
    Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu; 2013, 4 (25); 64-76
    2080-5977
    Pojawia się w:
    Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies