Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "the Union" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Przywileje lubelskie i koncepcja „narodu ruskiego” w polemice prawosławnej (od końca XVI do lat dwudziestych XVII wieku)
    The Lublin Privileges and the Notion of the “Ruthenian Nation” in Polemic Orthodox Narratives (the Late 16th century through the 1620s)
    Autorzy:
    Starczenko, Natalia
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Kotyńska, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648017.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    polemika prawosławna
    Cerkiew prawosławna
    naród ruski
    przywilej lubelski
    Unia Lubelska
    Religious polemics
    privileges granted with the Union of Lublin
    the Volhynian Voivodeship
    the Principality of Kyiv
    princes
    law
    identity
    Opis:
    In the article, the author analyzes the Lublin privileges for the Volhynian lands and the Kiev Principality as an important resource for constructing “the Ruthenian nation” as a political subject in polemical texts created after the Union of Brest (1596). Based on Apokrisis Christophora Philaletha and Palinodiа by Zachariasz Kopystenski and Melecjusz Smotrycki’s works of the early 1620s, the article tracks the meanings with which the polemists imbued the notion of “the Ruthenian nation,” and how they carved the space for the third member on the already established map of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of Two Nations based on the “ancient rights” and the privileges received with the Union of Lublin. The reading of the polemical narratives from this perspective allows to significantly undermine the popular scholarly notion that the Orthodox authors identified “the Ruthenian nation” almost exclusively with the Orthodox population, and its territory with the Kiev Metropolis. The author draws the conclusion that the notion of “the Ruthenian nation” as an amorphous confessional unity of the believers of the “ancient Greek Orthodox faith” was ceding to the political model of “Rus”, based on “its own” laws, “its own” territory, and the virtual authority of its princes. In essence, it was the polemists’ reliance on the Lublin privileges as the legal basis for the existence of the Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth that encouraged them to construct the territorial and legal model of the Ruthenian nation.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 196-221
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Unia polsko-litewsko-szwedzko-fińska za Zygmunta III Wazy
    Polish-Swedish Union during the reign of Sigismund III – research possibilities
    Autorzy:
    Krawczuk, Wojciech
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648005.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Zygmunt III Waza
    unia polsko-litewska
    unia polsko-szwedzka
    unia polsko szwedzko-fińska
    The Polish-Swedish Union
    Sigismund III
    the Chancellery
    the Modern Age
    Opis:
    The short-lived personal union of the years 1593–1599 encompassed many territories of modern Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Belorussia, Ukraine, Latvia, Estonia and even some parts of today Russia. The idea of union was however unsuccessful, primarily due to religious differences. Nevertheless we can observe development of a small group of dignitaries, officers or diplomats interested in the success of this project, naturally with king Sigismund in the center. Some research tasks in connection with this theme can be identified: edition of little-known sources, especially king Sigismund’s Swedish chancery, but also prosopographical studies, or the analysis of the iconosphere.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 225-231
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    „A niechaj już unijej w skrzyniach nie chowamy” – akty unii lubelskiej i horodelskiej z archiwum Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego w zbiorach Radziwiłłów
    „Let us no longer secrete the Unions in our coffers”. Union of Lublin and Union of Horodło acts from the archives of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Radziwiłłs’ collection
    Autorzy:
    Jankowski, Rafał
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16624571.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Unia Lubelska
    Unia horodelska
    unie polsko-litewskie
    Radziwiłłowie
    Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
    Archiwum
    Union of Horodło
    Union of Lublin
    Radziwiłł Warsaw Archive
    documentary archive of the Great Duchy of Lithuania
    Opis:
    The article discusses the preservation history of two copies of the Union of Lublin act, the fate of which is unknown. These were: the second copy of the Lithuanian side’s act issued for the Polish Crown and the act of the Union handed over by the Polish side to Lithuanians. In the course of describing the history of the acts of the Union of Lublin, the author also describes the fate of several documents directly related to the Union of Lublin, contained in the Radziwiłł collection. Since the times of Nyasvizh and Kleck fee holder Antoni Wilhelm Radziwiłł (1833–1904), the acts of the Union of Lublin were kept under supervision in a special box which also contained the acts of the Union of Horodło. For this reason, the article also presents the course of preservation of the Union of Horodło. The author of the article puts forward a hypothesis that the acts of both the Union of Horodło and the Union of Lublin from the Radziwiłł collection were burnt in Warsaw together with the Krasiński fee library in the first half of October 1944.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 292-334
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Unia Lubelska a problem rywalizacji o przywództwo w elicie politycznej Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
    The Union of Lublin and the problem of competition for leadership within the political elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
    Autorzy:
    Kempa, Tomasz
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648085.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Union of Lublin
    magnates
    elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
    Sigismund II Augustus
    Unia lubelska
    magnateria
    elita Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
    Zygmunt II August
    Opis:
    The paper presents the problem of power struggle among the leading Lithuanian magnates in the context of the preparation and conclusion of the Union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania with the Crown of Poland in 1569. Three centres contended to play a major role in Lithuanian policy before the Union of Lublin: The Radziwiłłs, with their undisputed leader – Chancellor, and Voivode of Vilnius, Mikołaj known as “the Red”; the Chodkiewicz family, among whom the starost of Samogitia, Jan Chodkiewicz, grew to be the most active figure even before the Sejm in Lublin; and a representative of Orthodox Church adherents, Knyaz [prince] Jerzy Olelkowicz Słucki, who did not hold any prestigious offices. The aspirations of Prince Słucki stemmed from the fact that he was the closest relative of Sigismund II Augustus, the last representative of Jagiellonian dynasty on the Polish-Lithuanian throne. While Radziwiłł “the Red” was against the new, stricter union with Poland, the other two magnates opposed him, supporting the idea of a new union. Since the King supported the project of further political rapprochement between Poland and Lithuania since the Sejm of 1562/63, the support for the union brought Chodkiewicz a number of promotions and royal endowments in the 1560s (all the more so as the monarch wanted to pit the Chodkiewicz family against the Radziwiłłs, who were all-powerful in Lithuania at that time). Jan Chodkiewicz was also able to take advantage of the obstruction that “Red” used during the Lublin Sejm (when he forced the Lithuanians to secretly leave Lublin), and it was ultimately he who played a major role in completing negotiations on the union and signing the new union in 1569. Although “Red” did not return to Lublin to finalise the union deliberations, he quickly regained the King’s trust. He was supported by the younger generation of the Radziwiłłs, including his son Krzysztof and his nephew Mikołaj Krzysztof, who had sworn an oath of union in Lublin. Prince Słucki’s plan, on the other hand, failed completely. Słucki, as a result of his absence from the Sejm in Lublin due to illness, lost his chance to gain an exceptional position in the new Senate (as the king’s closest relative). The Union of Lublin did not change the balance of power in Lithuania. Mikołaj “the Red” Radziwiłł and Jan Chodkiewicz remained the most influential Lithuanian magnates in the following years.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 140-161
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies