Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Polish – Lithuanian commonwealth" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska aktem założycielskim Rzeczypospolitej
The Union of Lublin as a founding act of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647667.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
unia lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
unie polsko-litewskie
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Central Archive of Historical Records
AGAD
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 13-64
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska we współczesnej ukraińskiej historiografii i dydaktyce
The Union of Lublin in contemporary Ukrainian historiography and didactics
Autorzy:
Biłous, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
historiografia ukraińska
dydaktyka
nauczanie historii
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Ukraine
historiography
history textbooks
Opis:
In Ukrainian historiography, treatment of the significance and aftermath of the Union of Lublin depended on ideological priorities of the time. In the 19 th and 20 th century historians were united by a sustained anti-Polish attitude. As early as in the 19th century, the scholars built an image of Poland as the main “stranger” in Ukrainian history. This negative image survived throughout the 20th century and passed into the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to examine various historiographic problems and stereotypes related to the Union of Lublin in the last 25 years and evolution, i.e. transformation, of the views of Ukrainian historians and textbook authors regarding this landmark event. Soviet historiography borrowed the negative assessment of the Union of Lublin and its consequences for Ukraine from the “national” concept of Mykhailo Hrushevsky and, going further, added new stereotypes to it. In the mid-1990s we observe a departure from the model introduced by Hrushevsky and the Soviet model of writing about history. As a result of the new political realities, some emphases in historiography have shifted, the evaluations of events have changed slightly, and historians have outlined new, neutral evaluations of the union. Over the past ten years, a number of modern works by Ukrainian researchers have emerged, appreciating the common heritage of Poland and Ukraine, especially from the history of parliamentarianism, ideology, identity and culture, the history of the nobility, the bourgeoisie and the Cossacks, which have their roots in the Union of Lublin, when the Ukrainian lands became part of the former Commonwealth. In 2019, in connection with the 450th anniversary of the Union of Lublin, interest in this event among the Ukrainian public has increased. A scholarly conference was held with the support of the Polish Institute in Kiev. Unfortunately, new views of historians have not affected the content of most textbooks for secondary and tertiary schools. They still describe the Union of Lublin along the lines of the “best” Soviet models. In recent years, state policy in Ukraine has been aimed primarily at overcoming myths about the 20th century. Therefore, much attention is paid to the content of the recent history books, while the events of the 16th–17th century remain in its “shadow”. Although ideological formulas and stereotypes of national and Soviet historiography have been partly incorporated into contemporary textbooks, some positive changes in the assessment of the consequences of the Union of Lublin are already visible. The topic of the Union of Lublin is well suited for developing critical thinking among pupils and students. It allows them to form their own assessment, based on facts, sources and the latest research by historians.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 273-291
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Świadectwa o dawnej Polsce w źródłach ormiańskich. Współczesna wzmianka o Unii Lubelskiej
Mentions of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Kingdom of Poland in Armenian sources. Contemporary mention of Union of Lublin
Autorzy:
Mnatsakanyan, Piruz
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647999.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
Ormianie
Ormianie polscy
Armenian sources for history of Old Poland
Kamyanets
Chronicle
Armenian community in Old Poland
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 235-258
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Ja na to nie zezwalam, ani nie chcę nowego na bracią swą stanowić”. Przywódcy szlacheccy Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego na sejmie lubelskim 1569 roku
“I do not permit this, and I do not wish to impose anything new on my brothers”. Nobility leaders of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the Sejm of Lublin in 1569
Autorzy:
Padalinski, Uładzimir
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648124.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
sejm lubelski 1569 r.
przywódcy polityczni
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Rzeczpospolita
szlachta
demokracja szlachecka
ruch szlachecki
nobility movement
Sejm of Lublin 1569
political leaders
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
nobility
nobility democracy
Opis:
The existence of an independent nobility movement in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, separate from the local magnates milieu, is one of the fundamental factors in researching the political system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in early modern times. Without such a nobility movement, it is impossible to speak of the noblemen’s democracy in the 16th –18th century. The article presents the activities of the Lithuanian delegation at the Sejm of Lublin in the summer of 1569. It presents the ideas and demands of the nobility and its political leaders. A group of deputies presented a whole gamut of demands, reflecting the needs and socio-political interests of the minor and middle nobility, to the Sejm. Political leaders who acted as spokespersons for the rights and freedoms of the nobility were the land deputies Malcher Snowski and Mikołaj Stankiewicz-Billewicz. Both of them enjoyed high regard among the nobility. They strived to transform its postulates into concrete parliamentary decisions. Economic independence was an important factor in ensuring their independent political position. The author concludes that in the 1560s an independent movement was established in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania under the slogans of noblemen’s democracy. However, in the second half of the 16th century, the leaders of the nobility movement of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania could only hope to fulfill their aspirations if they were supported either by the monarch or by those magnates who supported the slogans of the noblemen’s democracy.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 105-121
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies