Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "of Human Rights" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
Tytuł:
Integralność praw, człowieka
Integrity of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1849411.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-05-14
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
prawa człowieka
prawa człowieka do wolności sumienia
wolności religijnej i wolności opinii
human rights
human rights for freedom of conscience
religious freedom and freedom of opinion
Opis:
The leading motif in the Church’s teaching is the inborn and supernatural dignity of each human being that is the only and supreme moral norm. It is from this norm that human rights and other principles follow. The first and fundamental way of the Church is recognizing each human being’s dignity, and reminding: Respect the dignity and freedom of every human person! During the meetings of the OSCE the Holy See mainly promoted the right to freedom of conscience and of opinions in connection with all human rights. It postulated recognition of human rights as a principle of the international law. Overcoming the dispute concerning the contents of the concept of human rights was possible, among others, at the Vienna Conference. There it was said that all human rights follow from the dignity of the human person and from the human being’s inherent value; it was also stated that the human person is the main subject of human rights and fundamental freedoms, so he should be their main addressee and actively participate in the realization of the rights. In the document accepted at the Copenhagen Conference the human person was recognized as the supreme value that is the foundation of the inborn and inalienable human rights. Moreover, the contents of the concept of the right of man to freedom of conscience, to religious freedom and to freedom of opinions is contained in Art. 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and developed in the same articles of the International Convention for Personal and Liberation Rights. The human rights may be protected in democracy and in a law-governed state. John Paul II stressed that real democracy is possible in a law-governed state on the basis of the correct concept of the human person. The essence of democracy is respecting all the human rights.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2009, 37; 7-31
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uniwersalność praw i obowiązków człowieka
The Universal Character of Human Rights and Duties
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1871097.pdf
Data publikacji:
1990
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The author points at the necessity to work out of universal conception of human rights and duties. In this paper he presents an outline of such a conception. The extant conceptions are partial and imbued with ideologies. They are based on false visions of man. The universal conception of human rights and duties can be worked out in tune with the interdisciplinary studies. The author removes everything that is irrelevant in this field under consideration to show the universal character of human rights and duties by way of dialogical, fundamental, prophetic, and situational criticism. In the dialogical criticism he revises, on the one hand, the current conceptions of freedom and freedom rights, and, on the other, the way in which human social rights are understood as state alms. Talking about the fundamental criticism he emphasizes the fact that the principle of human rights should be taken in its connection with other social principles such as: the principle of person’s dignity, of common good, of auxiliariness, of justice and others. The prophetic criticism is supposed to show not only the aspects of the infringement on human rights, but first of all the mechanisms of their infringement. The situational criticism permits the author to show that the so-called relative character of human rights concerns their hierarchy and modes of their carrying out, which modes are dependent on the history and culture of various nations; the basis of the universal character of human rights and duties is person’s dignity which is a universal value, independent of history, culture and other social-political systems. The author takes the standpoint according to which one cannot present the universal theory of human rights without showing beforehand an integral vision of man. He emphasizes that person’s dignity is an innate, universal and indispensable value. On the basis of this value he formulates a fundamental normative principle of human rights and duties: „persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam”. Secondly, while defining the contents of human rights he refers to the psychosomatic nature of man, which nature is the groundwork of various needs. The basic needs bear a universal character. Yet it is not needs that are human rights, their contents being values capable of fulfilling these needs. It is a human right to be entitled to a certain value (Rechtswert). Thirdly, man should be looked upon as a social being (ens sociale). This kind of approach to man allows to rationally explain the correlation between rights and duties. Fourthly, man cannot be taken as a „small god”, since he is able to do good, but also evil, to build concentration camps, to commit genocide, to steal, to lie and the like. The affairs being as such, we have to state that one cannot talk about absolute, boundless rights of freedom granted to man. They are bounded not so much by the freedom of other individuals as rather by truth and common good. The author is not satisfied with a mere presentation of the universal character of human rights, but also points at the necessity to work out a universal strategy of their defence. He says that it is necessary to establish an international authority and form democratic structures within the world society. The effective and universal defence of human rights may be guaranteed by a solidary cooperation of all nations for the sake of development. Nevertheless the very defence of these rights is already a crucial factor of the social, economic and cultural development of nations.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1990, 18, 1; 149-166
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Popieranie i obrona praw człowieka przez Kościół
Support and Protection of Human Rights by the Church
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1872837.pdf
Data publikacji:
1984
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
The author shows that support and protection of human rights by the Church is drawn on the following three planes: through teaching, education and practical activity. In the Church’s documents on social matters it is believed that there is close correlation between human rights and the Gospel. The Synod of Bishops in Rome (1974) pointed out that the development- of human rights is the order of the Gospel, and that it must occupy the central place in the teaching of the Church. The Church supports and protects human rights through developing and proclaiming the integral concept of these rights. In the author’s opinion the one-sided formulation of human rights (i.e. either stressing freedom or equality) leads to a faulty realization of these. Human rights must be realized with emphasis on all of their aspects: freedom, social and solidarity ones. The Church’s contribution in protecting human rights lies in her awakening people’s consciousness that these rights concern every individual. The ignorance of human rights application facilitates their infringement. To counteract this and to protect observance of human rights both within the state and on the international plane there is great role to play by public opinion. Which constitutes a kind of sanction, namely a sociological one. The Church is an important subject in shaping public opinion, through condemnation and unmasking all forms of violence, and through protests. The Church also contributes to the observance of human rights trough education and shaping the human rights culture. Education for human rights should be based on such a hierarchy of values in which human beings are given priority over capital, spiritual values over material ones, ethics over technology, etc. It should be based on the dogma of brotherhood of men, on the truth, equal dignity. It is also important that people be educated in the spirit of tolerance and that they could criticize unjust structures and values popularized in mass media. Their education should be based on the truth and love. It should teach how to use freedom and fulfil duties. „Only that one is fully and truly free who strives for the same freedom for other people” (John Paul II). People and nations should be taught the dialogue which is a moral imperative. The author points out that there is a close correlation between the observance of human rights and peace and equates education for human rights with education for peace. He emphasizes the facet that peace is the fundamental right of man. The Church’s practical activity in support of human rights is presented in historical perspective. The social-charitable and educational activity continued through centuries by the Church has been raised to the rank of legal protection. This is closely related to human rights even when the concept of human rights itself does not exist, eg. in the Middle Ages the Church’s legislation protected such rights as we today call the right to live in peace, to culture (language), to exist as a state, etc. More and more attention is directed to the protection of human rights by local Churches in Latin America. The Holy See offers co-operation with international and other organizations in support of human rights. It had its considerable contribution in formulating and proclaiming the so-called principle of human rights in Helsinki.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1984, 12, 1; 5-65
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Godność osoby ludzkiej czy prawo naturalne podstawą praw osoby ludzkiej w ujęciu Jacquesa Maritaina
The Dignity of the Human Person or Natural Law as the Basis of the Rights of the Human Person According to Jacques Maritain
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1860754.pdf
Data publikacji:
1997
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Opis:
It is true that Maritain writes that natural law (la loi naturelle) is the foundation of human rights, yet he proves that rights are natural rights in the strict sense of the term, whereas others are necessarily bound with it, and yet others are bound only in a contingent manner. The French philosopher considered natural law at two levels: ontological and cognitive. The human being possesses, likewise all other living creatures, a unique structure and goals, a normal way of its functioning (normalité de son foncionnement) - law. The goals are as follows: maintenance of existence and development. For man this law bears a moral character, for man is person, i.e. a rational, free being that has conscience, and he is the master of his own acts. Maritain calls this right a non-written law (la loi non écrite). Now in the ontic fabric of man reside goods which are his due: existence (life) and freedom. Apart from these goods he is entitled to the rights: to life and freedom. In this ontic fabric resides a natural inclination to maintain life, to give life, and to develop. One may maintain one’s existence and reach integral development by acquiring other goods and fulfilling good deeds (working). He, too, has the duty to do good, without which he will fail to maintain his existence and will not reach his goal. Following St Thomas, Maritain lays down the first principle of natural law: do good and avoid evil acts. In this principle reside the most fundamental rights and duties of the human person. It is characteristic of its interpretation that it puts rights before duties. Either of them has a personal and social aspect. The foundation of natural law is the dignity of the human person. Dignity is a metaphysical absolute value, residing in the ontic fabric of person. The core of dignity is in the soul of man, who was created in the likeness of God (imago Dei). Maritain writes: „The dignity of the human person is a word which denotes nothing, if it does not mean that the person of his or her own natury possesses [...] rights”. To know natural law - its gnoseological aspect - is a different problem. It is known spontaneously, in a nonreflective manner, and progressively as regards the degree of civilizational development of mankind, which is pinpointed by ethnology and history of societies. It was exposed to the hazard of errors just as in all other affairs, due to the fact that human reason is imperfect. However, the sound line of moral experience of the binding power of natural law was still developed and will further be developed. Following St Thomas, Maritain lists natural law, the law of nations (ius gentium), the positive revealed Divine law and (established) human law. He incorporates natural law known by way of reflection, and not spontaneously by inclination, within ius gentium and calls it the common law of civilisation (la loi commune de la civilisation). Now ius gentium is linked with natural law in a necessary manner, whereas human law is linked with it only conditionally and contingently. The author of paper proposes to call human law the law of culture. Following the above division, Maritain gives three groups of human rights: rights which belong to natural law, to ius gentium and to positive law. The rights of the human person which belong to natural law and ius gentium are inalienable, unforfeitable - absolute, yet in the aspect of their being granted to human beings. In the aspect, however, of their application they do not have the character of absolute rights, for the human person is a little god. Maritain has also given a different division of human rights: the rights of the human person as such (droits de la personne humaine comme telle), the rights of the civil person (droits de la personne civique), and the rights of the social person, in particular the working person (droits de la personne sociale, et plus particulièrement de la personne ouwrière). Speaking about the rights of the social person, he lists the rights of the people fulfilling some social, economic and cultural functions: producers, consumers, technicians, creators of culture and science. There is still a debate about the right to work, and some Catholic authors negate it, yet Maritain recognizes this right as a basic right and ranks it first among the rights of the person-labourer. He predicted that along with the progress of economic organization a new right to the title of labour (au titre de travail) would be read out, a right which he also called the title of labour (le titre de travail). Not only does the title of possessing property entitle one to manage enterprise, but also to have the title of labour. He pointed to the necessity to take up reform of capitalism and to shape a new socio-economic order. This order should be an order of the aristocracy of labour, that is such in which social, economic and political life will be run by people who are best in their job. To put this regime into effect requires a „moral revolution”.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 1997, 25, 1; 33-61
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Teologiczno-filozoficzny personalizm katolickiej nauki społecznej w ujęciu Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego
Theologico-philosophical Personalism of the Catholic Social Doctrine According to Stefan Cardinal Wyszyński
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1857232.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
katolicka nauka społeczna
Stefan Kardynał Wyszyński
personalizm
prawa osoby ludzkiej
praca
własność
Familia humana
Catholic social teaching
Primate Stefan Wyszyński
personalism
rights of the human person
work
property
Opis:
The paper seeks to work out in a synthetic manner the basic views of Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński on the issues concerning the foundations of the Catholic social doctrine. The author puts forward and justifies a thesis about a personalistic dimension of the Catholic social doctrine according to Cardinal Wyszyński. He shows the main elements of the teaching of the Primate of the Millennium, such as: human rights, the problems of marriage and family, national issues, the idea of a moral-social order, the problems of labour, the right to private property. The paper points to the main foundations and sources of the teaching of Primate Wyszyński, i.e. the Bible, the Magisterium of the Church, the encyclicals of Pope John Paul II.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2003, 31, 1; 47-59
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawa człowieka a prawa rodziny
Human rights and family rights
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1857663.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
prawa człowieka
prawa rodziny
Karta Praw Rodziny
human rights
family rights
Chart of Family Rights
Opis:
Human persons living in a family have universal and indivisible rights that are based on man's inborn dignity. From the philosophical point of view that dignity is a substantial, autonomous and self-defining being. From the legal point of view it is a physical subject. On the other hand, family, from the philosophical point of view, is a sui generis reality – an accidental being. Family is not recognised as a legal subject in the Polish family law or in the new Constitution (of April 2, 1997). In the Chart of Family Rights family is recognised as a subject of law. The Chart does not have a character of a legal document – it does not have a binding legal force – so it can be said that family only is a subject of morality and not of law. However, in the Pact of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights family is recognised as a subject of law. A two-plane relationship occurs here. The foundation of the rights of a human person is his inborn dignity, whereas the rights of family members are the foundation of family rights. They are not collective human rights but the rights of another subject, that is of family. Family has social, freedom and solidarity rights with corresponding correlative duties.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2001, 1; 97-128
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wkład Stolicy Apostolskiej w ochronę prawa człowieka do wolności sumienia i wolności religijnej w Konferencjach Bezpieczeństwa i Współpracy w Europie (KBWE i OBWE)
The Holy See’s Contribution to the Protection of the Right to Freedom of Conscience and the Religious Freedom in Conferences on Security and Cooperation in Europe and Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE and OSCE)
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1835193.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-05-12
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
prawa człowieka
wolność sumienia
wolność religijna
Stolica Apostolska
godność osoby ludzkiej
human rights
freedom of conscience
religious freedom
Holy See
dignity of the human person
Opis:
The article is the first part of a discussion of the issue of the part taken by the Holy See in the Conferences of Security and Cooperation in Europe. In the analyses the origin and the motives for participation of the Holy See in the international discussion on protecting human rights for the freedom of conscience and the religious freedom are presented. In the area of documents concerning human rights a special attention is paid to the significance of John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in terris. Also, the Holy See’s postulates and suggestions that deal with the question of the value and dignity of the human person are discussed. The final analyses include the issue of the personal dimension of the right to the freedom of conscience and the religious freedom.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2008, 36, 1; 45-72
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Godność osoby ludzkiej i obiektywne normy moralne jako reguły w działalności gospodarczej
Dignity of the human person and objective moral norms as rules in economy
Autorzy:
Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1852622.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
osoba ludzka
godność
normy moralne
prawa człowieka
wartości uniwersalne
wartość pracy ludzkiej
bezrobocie
human person
dignity
moral norms
human rights
universal values
value of human work
unemployment
Opis:
The author subjects to revision the economic liberalism supporters’ views, according to which there is no room for universal moral norms in the area of economy. The conception of homo economicus accepted in economy and the exclusive rule of profit are a manifestation of reductionism. The conviction that the free competition – free market – acts mechanically and impersonally and solves all economic-social problems in the best way is basically incorrect. In free competition there are positive and negative elements. Free competition – “yes, but what kind?” In the article a possibly complete picture of man is shown. Man is a reasonable creature, he is internally free and able to recognize good and evil (owing to his conscience) and owing to this he is the most perfect being in the created world. In his nature, man is a social being (ens sociale); a spiritual-bodily unity; he is not completely actualized but he is open to development; he is a religious and working creature (laborem exercens, homo economicus); he is able to do good, devote oneself to others, to build just – albeit not ideal –systems: legal, cultural, social and economic. But man is also able to do evil: to kill others, to steal, to lie, to wage wars, to commit acts of terrorism and of genocide, to build concentration camps, to manipulate the needs and mentality of whole societies and to enslave others by means of mass media – that is to form a one-dimension man. In the theological-biblical language this is called sinfulness of the human nature. And finally, man is capable of – as H. Marcuse writes – “scientific idiotism”. The highest value is the inborn, n a t u r a l, dignity of the human person, which is pointed to by his mind, inner freedom and conscience. Man is created in God’s image (imago Dei). Christ’s incarnation and redemption of man show his s u p e r n a t u r a l dignity. This is theological-biblical justification. Also philosophical (rational) justification is given. The former one is binding for believers, and the latter is for unbelievers. In the Catholic social teaching both justifications are given. The ontic structure of the human person in itself gives rise to obligations, it is the highest norm. It is defined in the following form: the human person should be respected for himself, because he is a person, and not for any other reason (persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam). The very human person, his dignity, is the fundamental norm of morality that is searched for. The Decalogue, objective and universal moral norms as principles show how to respect and protect the human person. It is not recognizing and complying with moral norms and human rights for themselves that is meant here – art for the art’s sake (pure formalism) – but protection of one’s own dignity and the dignity of every other person. Both moral norms as principles and human rights have been discovered slowly, step by step, but regressions also occur; this especially happened in the 20th and at the beginning of the 21st century. Human persons are the subjects of all communities – the family, the nation, the universal human society (familiae humanae), production and service institutions. The communities do not exist by themselves, but human persons are their foundation. Human persons, and not various systems, are the subject of any activity, for the systems are not persons or super-persons – Super Ego. Hence the thesis put forward by some economists that the system is ruled by an invisible hand is absurd. In human rights three elements are distinguished: their source, contents and protection. These constitute an integral whole. However, identifying a part with the whole (pars pro toto) is a logical mistake. The debate about man’s right to work can be solved after removing this logical mistake and introducing a new term: “the right for work”; showing that work is one of man’s fundamental needs, that it is a universal phenomenon, has a multi-aspectual dimension of values. Work is an anthropological (personal), moral, social, cultural, historical and economic value. Together with the multidimensional value of work the multidimensional evil of unemployment can be seen. There have been various economic models, even in capitalism. After the fall of socialism the thesis is proclaimed that capitalism is the only alternative (logical quantifier). Recognizing the priority of the real capital over work treated as a tool and commodity bought in the so-called work market is the essential feature of capitalism. John Paul II perceives numerous positive elements in capitalism, but he also sees a few negative ones: “We have found out that the thesis saying that after the defeat of real socialism capitalism remains the only model (logical quantifier) of economic organization is unacceptable.” He does not suggest another model, but generally he states that it is “… a society in which there are: freedom of work, enterprise and participation” that is meant here. He adds: “Economy that does not take into consideration the ethical dimension and does not attempt to serve the good of man – each man and the whole man – in fact does not even deserve the name of «economy» understood as reasonable and benevolent management of material resources”. Although he sees positive elements in the process of globalization, he puts forward an imperative demand to base it on the principle of the dignity of the human person and his rights, and the good of the whole human family (familiae humanae). In the area of economy “ … in the field of economy nobody may insult the human dignity without a punishment, which dignity God himself respects greatly” (Leo XIII).
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2006, 34, 1; 19-53
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies