Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "ustawa," wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Nowa ustawa o ochronie zabytków w Niemieckiej Republice Demokratycznej
    A NEW LAW CONCERNING HISTORICAL MONUMENTS PROTECTION IN GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
    Autorzy:
    Malinowski, Kazimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537565.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1976
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    „Prawo o Opiece nad Zabytkami”
    ustawa o ochronie zabytków w NRD
    polityczna ustawa o ochronie zabytków w NRD
    Opis:
    The present article deals with the „Law concerning Historical Monuments Protection” enacted in GDR in June, 1975, and replacing the one from 1961. Although the new Law refers in many respects to the old one, it also contains elements completely new and consequently it extends and consolidates the system of historical monuments protection in GDR. It includes, among others, a clause which gives significance to monument connected with German international and workers’ movement. It also says th a t all administration authorities as well as social organizations should be made responsible for historical monuments protection and all historical monuments should be accounted for in the central register. The Law states clearly th a t historical monuments protection should be included in the national plan for economic development; it also promotes the Institute of Historical Monuments Protection which is to initiate various forms of protection and utilization of monuments. A novelty of greatest importance was to appoint the Cabinet a body of control and to make it responsible for monuments protection. Allocation of funds to historical monuments protection is also considered to be of great significance. The new Law will most probably be followed by due executive decisions.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 3; 208-210
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Co wnosi nowego ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i o muzeach?
    Autorzy:
    Malinowski, Kazimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536235.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1962
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury o muzeach
    radziecka uchwała o ochronie zabytków
    czechosłowacka ustawa o zabytkach kultury
    ochrona zabytków w Niemieckiej Republice Demokratycznej
    użytkownictwo zabytków
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1962, 2; 3-10
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dziesięciolecie Ustawy o Ochronie Dóbr Kultury i o Muzeach
    THE TENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CULTURAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AND MUSEUMS LAW, 1962
    Autorzy:
    Malinowski, Kazimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537259.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1973
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i muzeach
    Towarzystwo Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
    powstanie służby konserwatorskiej
    dobra kultury
    Opis:
    It is namely this tenth year elapsing from the date on which The Cultural Property Protection and Museums Law has been passed in the Polish Seym that gave the author rise to write his article where he reminds that the above Law may be regarded as a consequence of the progressively, from the 18th century onward, growing respect for antiquities. At the same time the author points to the fact that this Law contains a number of provisions that are extending both scope of notions and range of activities in conservation and in museums in this country. From among the newly adopted conceptions to be emphasized here deserves the term „cultural property” but at the same the fact of retaining of the term „historical monument” with the use of which the Law determines the objects of cultural property that are recorded in museum inventories or in those kept by the Voivodship Conservators. As especially important the author considers the first article of the Law reading as follows: „The protection of cultural property is an obligation for the State and the duty of its citizens”. This basic statement is followed by all further provisions. Under the term „cultural property” also the modern objects are meant provided, hovewer, that they can prove important from the point of view of the nation’s cultural heritage and development of its culture. According to the author’s further reasoning the Law extends its legal protection also to battlefields and to sites connected with the Nazi persecutive actions during the last war, to objects of material culture, to monuments of nature, etc. While providing the possibility to act in many different ways the Law at the same time requires that the all conservation tre a tments be based on scientific assumptions. As a fu rther consequence of obligations that by the force of the Law in question were put on all citizens the following can be considered: the calling into being of advisory bodies supporting the Minister of Culture and Arts and those acting at Voivodship Conservators Offices; the provisions determining the use to be made of historical monuments as well as those settling the manner in which they should be made accessible to the public; or, finally, those dealing with their popularization and social contributions for the sake of their protection. The due attention has been devoted to individual collectors who were granted with a number of special privileges. What concerns museums it must be considered as appreciable that in addition to the term „museum” has been introduced that of „collection of exhibits” who are otherwise called the „museum objects”. As fully adequate as to its ability to characterize the museums practice is to be regarded a review of functions that should be performed by a museum; of them, of course, as the most important are to be considered those scientific and educational. However, it must also be stated that the ten-year experience has shown not only the advantages resulting of the Law under discussion, but also pointed to some failures the sources of which, according to the author’s opinion, must mainly be sought in the executive regulations. So, for example, as the author suggests, the Voivodship Conservators should be supplied with decisive powers while collaborating with the local authorities responsible for spatial development and townplanning; an ex officio recording of the movable monuments of the past should be made also more extensive, and especially in cases where they are kept under unfavourable conditions; obligatory practices should be introduced for persons graduating in movable monument conservation divisions a t the high schools; and, finally, much more care should be devoted to decisions concerning the cancelling the historical buildings in a Register of Historical Monuments and their demolishions. There is no doubt that provided that the more thorough consideration be paid to these decisions it would become possible to safeguard a considerable number of objects without any more serious disadvantages or burdens to national economy. Toward those demanding th a t serious alterations or amandments be introduced to the Cultural Property Protection and Museums Law the author of the present assumed a critical or even negative attitude as it is his view th at a document of such fundamental nature as a Law should be one sound enough and, thus all its provisions represent an obvious standard or even a habit governing the attitudes of the society. It is then only that it will be possible to hope th a t our cultural heritage might survive without any further losses.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1973, 2; 85-88
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ustawa Związku Socjalistycznych Republik Radzieckich o ochronie i wykorzystaniu zabytków historii i kultury
    THE RESOLUTION OF THE UNION OF THE SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE PROTECTION AND USE OF HISTORIC AND CULTURAL MONUMENTS
    Autorzy:
    Malinowski, Kazimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536062.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1978
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    Jarosław Wojciechowski
    dekret Rady Regencyjnej o opiece nad zabytkami
    ochrona zabytków w ZSRR
    ustawa o ochronie zabytków kultury w ZSRR
    Państwowa ewidencja zabytków historii i kultury ZSRR
    wykorzystanie zabytków w ZSRR
    Opis:
    The autors makes a comparative study of two documents on the protection o f historic monuments, namely the Resolution of the Council o f Ministers o f 1976 and that o f 1948. According to the author, the 1948 Resolution contained the most important postulates on conservation and museums but it involved too many organizations in the protection o f historic monuments. Besides, the 1948 Resolution did not specify the age o f protected monuments and did not contain penalty clauses. A new Resolution o f 29.10.1976, thoroughly discussed by the author, is in principle based on the 1948 Resolution. In his appraisal of the Resolution the author says that it introduces many new postulates and attaches an utmost importance to the question o f the protection o f historic monuments as the supreme body is here the Council of Ministers o f the USSR. The Resolution enlarges a list of monuments under protection (landscape, reservations, etc.). The problem of financing the monuments is solved in such a way that the user of a given historic building pays a rent for it which in turn is used to finance works on other historic objects. A great emphasis is put also on keeping records of historic monuments and on the responsibility o f administrative authorities for their protection. One of the chapters deals with penalties. Summing up, the Soviet Resolution o f 1976 is a legal document based on a traditional system o f the protection of historic monuments, but re-thought and uptodated.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 3; 155-160
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies