Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "the need for" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
BOUNDARIES BETWEEN ENSURING SECURITY AND UNNECESSARY SOCIAL SURVEILLANCE – CASE STUDY OF THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
Autorzy:
M, Hrynicki, Wojciech
Tomasz, Greif,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/891483.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-08-13
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego i Indywidualnego Apeiron w Krakowie
Tematy:
security public security
social security
social surveillance
need to take action for social security
The German Democratic Republic
Opis:
1. Objective The objective of this article is to present the need to control society in order to ensure security both to the society itself and to the state, and to draw an extremely fluid boundary line between what is necessary and what is unnecessary, which may turn into unnecessary surveillance which sometimes becomes caricatural. The duty to ensure security to the society, particularly in the era of increasing religious terrorism in Europe (resulting from simple relationships in the society), is an obligation aimed at permanence of existence of a given social group (national, supranational) functioning within the state and as such should be connected with aptly chosen methods of supervision. 2. Introduction Security is the overriding need of humans and it determines their other needs and the motives for the actions they take. It manifests itself not only in the lack of hazards (which constitutes its basic principle related to the assurance of existence) but also in the need to take action to ensure appropriate conditions for development of individuals as well as smaller and larger social groups. Hence, today’s understanding of security is not exclusively linked with the existence of humans or social groups (lack of hazards); it must be analysed from the point of view of its development, which in turn determines the evolution of such categories of security as economic, scientific cultural security, or job security. However, such secondary categories of security, which ensure the development of individuals and various social groups, cannot be pursued without eliminating potential threats to the existence of humans, particularly those related to their life and health, and ensuring continuity of generations. In order to meet this objective, especially in the era of increasing terrorism, it is necessary to supervise the society, which is more and more culturally and religiously diverse, in the right way, and the supervision may not become caricatural as was the case with the German Democratic Republic. 3. Methodology The authors identify the need to exercise permanent supervision in the society, particularly in areas threatened with terrorism, and, at the same time, point out that it is possible to overstep the necessary surveillance in a manner leading to its caricatural forms, which occurred in the German Democratic Republic, non-existent today. The adopted comparative historical method allows for direct analysis of needs regarding security in comparison with the potential threat of adopting wrong methods to meet them. A glance at current threats to social security, including terrorism, confronted with the surveillance that was common in the German Democratic Republic, which ceased to exist over twenty-five years ago, throws doubt on the boundaries of the needed and acceptable social surveillance. 4. Conclusions The authors prove that it is difficult to draw a clear line between what is permissible and what is impermissible in social surveillance, especially in view of terrorism threats. Therefore, the actions of national authorities should be marked by far-reaching carefulness in the selection of surveillance methods so that a democratic state does not turn into a police state. They agree, however, that supervision in the form of well administered surveillance is one of the methods of ensuring security to individuals and society.
Źródło:
Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka – Refleksje; 2016, 23; 67-89
2299-4033
Pojawia się w:
Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka – Refleksje
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
NEED TO TAKE ACTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF CULTURAL SECURITY IN VIEW OF ITS CONTEMPORARY THREATS
Autorzy:
M, Hrynicki, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/891503.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-08-17
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego i Indywidualnego Apeiron w Krakowie
Tematy:
Security
cultural security
threats of cultural security
need to to take action for the benefit of cultural security
Opis:
1. Objective The objective of the article is to present the need to take action for the benefit of cultural security in view of its contemporary threats. The values cherished within the framework of cultural heritage are handed down from generation to generation and in this respect it is necessary to act ceaselessly for the benefit of cultural security, which is aimed not only at the protection of existing cultural achievements, but also at facilitating its constant development. 2. Introduction Cultural security has a significant influence on the security as a value and it is linked to continuous human development, which manifests itself, for instance, in development of culture. It has its roots in cultural threats, which have been present for thousands of years and which result from armed invasions, colonial conquests, meetings of cultures and mass migrations of population. Cultural security can be examined from two perspectives: the first one (national) is closely related to military, economic, ecological and political security, and the other one (social) appears as a group of elements expressing threat for the nation or its part, ethnic group, language, cultural achievements in material terms, and in terms of tradition and customs. 3. Methodology The author defines cultural security and identifies its threats, including, in particular, multiculturalism and related globalisation, migrations (especially from the east to the west) and refugeeism, economic diversification of societies, climate changes as well as pillage, theft and illegal trading in cultural goods. When describing each of the identified threats, the author not only presents the protective action taken (both preventive and consequent), but also tries to search for new methods of protection, emphasising the need for broad cooperation between national authorities, local government and non-governmental organisations. 4. Conclusions The author proves that cultural heritage and cultural security are both exposed to many threats, including, in particular, globalisation and demographic relations. To recapitulate, the author emphasises that action must be taken both by countries and government organisations to protect cultural heritage and cultural security, and that it is essential to actively support in this respect international activity (particularly the activity under the auspices of the United Nations) and non-governmental organisations.
Źródło:
Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka – Refleksje; 2015, 20; 219-237
2299-4033
Pojawia się w:
Kultura Bezpieczeństwa. Nauka – Praktyka – Refleksje
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies