Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "UWES" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Measurement of work engagement with single-item measure
    Autorzy:
    Kulikowski, Konrad
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2129203.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    measurement
    work engagement
    the UWES
    single-item
    Opis:
    In recent years, the construct of work engagement as well as methods for its measurement have generated growing interest in the field of occupational psychology. In this study, we aim to contribute to the current work engagement literature by investigating the possible advantages of single-item measures of work engagement by analysing their psychometric feasibility. Testing the validity of a single-item measure tool within the framework of the Job Demands-Resources theory, we have found similar pattern of correlations of single-item measures of work engagement with exhaustion, disengagement, job resources and job demands as for the well-established multi-item measure the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. The reliability of single-item measures tested with factor analysis and the attenuation formula was estimated to be in the range of between .60 and .70, the figure depending on the particulars of the estimation methods. Our findings provide an initial modicum of evidence that, if a research purpose requires it, or if the use of a multi-item measurement tool is overly restrictive or costly, then a single-item measure of work engagement could be effectively adopted.
    Źródło:
    Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2018, 49, 4; 406-415
    0079-2993
    Pojawia się w:
    Polish Psychological Bulletin
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool – A literature review
    Autorzy:
    Kulikowski, Konrad
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2161848.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-03-30
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    measurements
    work engagement
    factorial validity
    CFA
    UWES
    Utrecht Work Engagement Scale
    Opis:
    Work engagement as a predictor of health is an emerging concept in occupational science and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) is the most popular work engagement measurement tool. However, despite its popularity, the UWES is not free from controversy concerning its factorial validity. In this paper, 21 research studies on both UWES-9 and UWES-17 factorial validity within the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach have been reviewed in order to answer the question as to which of the UWES factorial structures displays greater validity. The originally proposed threefactor structure of the UWES has been recognized as superior in 6 studies. In further 6 studies, the UWES structure with 1 general factor has been found to be superior. In 8 studies, the authors have concluded that the one- and three-factor structures could be considered equivalent. One study has failed to confirm either the one- or three-factor structure of the UWES. These ambiguous results from studies focusing on the UWES factorial validity are puzzling because they not only indicate a lack of validity for the UWES as a measurement tool but might also challenge the whole concept of work engagement as a three-factor structure of dedication, vigor and absorption. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2017;30(2):161–175
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2017, 30, 2; 161-175
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zaangażowanie w pracę – problemy z pomiarem
    The measurement of work engagement – problems and issues
    Autorzy:
    Kulikowski, Konrad
    Madej, Magdalena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/525560.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014-01-30
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
    Tematy:
    pomiar zaangażowania w pracę
    czas pracy
    UWES
    work engagement measurement
    work arrangements
    Opis:
    Celem prezentowanych badań było sprawdzenie przydatności do pomiaru zaangażowania w pracę 17-itemowego kwestionariusza Praca Samopoczucie (The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale – UWES), który w wersji oryginalnej zawiera trzy podskale: wigor (vigor), zaabsorbowanie (absorbtion) oraz oddanie się pracy (dedication). W badanej próbie wykształconych Polaków (N=142) trzy podskale były wysoko skorelowane, co wskazuje na jednoczynnikową strukturę narzędzia. Przetestowano także dwie skrócone wersje 9-itemowe. Najlepsze własności psychometryczne miała 9-itemowa skala stworzona na podstawie analizy kowariancji danych z badanej próby. Jako miarę trafności wskaźnika zaangażowania w pracę potraktowano związek z charakterem czasu pracy. Zgodnie z przewidywaniami, pracownicy mający czas pracy o charakterze zmiennym byli bardziej zaangażowani niż pracownicy o czasie pracy stałym.
    The aim of this study was to examine utility of The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) as a tool to measure work engagement. The original version of UWES contains 17 items grouped in three subscales: vigor, absorption and dedication. In the sample of educated Polish people (N = 146) three subscales were highly correlated, indicating that the structure of UWES is rather one than three dimensional. We also tested two shortened 9-items UWES versions. Best psychometric properties (goodness of fit) had 9-items scale developed on the basis of confirmatory factor analysis conducted on collected data. The validity of the UWES was investigated by studying its relationship with work arrangements (variable vs. fixed). As expected, employees with variable work arrangements were more engaged than those with fixed arrangements.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Zarządzania; 2014, 1/2014 (45); 99-112
    1644-9584
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Zarządzania
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    All employees need job resources – Testing the Job Demands–Resources Theory among employees with either high or low working memory and fluid intelligence
    Autorzy:
    Kulikowski, Konrad
    Orzechowski, Jarosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2162497.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-10-30
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    cognitive functioning
    work engagement
    working memory
    fluid intelligence
    UWES
    Job Demands–Resources Theory
    Opis:
    Background The Job Demands–Resources Theory (JD-R) is one of the most influential theoretical frameworks for explaining work engagement. The JD-R postulates the existence of a health impairment process in which job demands lead to strain, and of a motivational process in which job resources lead to work engagement. Although cognitive functions are among the most important characteristics of employees related to job, still little is known about its moderating role in JD-R processes; hence in this study we make a novel attempt to test the invariance of JD-R propositions among employees at different levels of cognitive functioning. Material and Methods A group of 383 multioccupational employees completed a set of questionnaires measuring job resource: co-worker support, supervisor support, performance feedback; job demands: emotional demands, occupational constraints, work-home interferences; Utrecht Work Engagement Scale; Oldenburg Burnout Inventory along with 2 working memory and 3 fluid intelligence tests. Results The multigroup invariance analysis with latent variables revealed that both the health impairment process and the motivational process as postulated by JD-R are invariant across groups of employees with either high or low levels of fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Conclusions This result provides the first piece of evidence for JD-R robustness among employees at different levels of cognitive functioning. Our findings counterintuitively suggest that employees with high cognitive functioning are not more resistant to job demands than employees with low cognitive functioning and that in order to be work-engaged they need job resources, no less than their colleagues with low cognitive functioning. Med Pr 2018;69(5):483–496
    Źródło:
    Medycyna Pracy; 2018, 69, 5; 483-496
    0465-5893
    2353-1339
    Pojawia się w:
    Medycyna Pracy
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies