Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Richter, Piotr" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer; update 2017
Autorzy:
Kulig, Jan
Wallner, Grzegorz
Drews, Michał
Frączek, Mariusz
Jeziorski, Arkadiusz
Kielan, Wojciech
Kołodziejczyk, Piotr
Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna
Starzyńska, Teresa
Zinkiewicz, Krzysztof
Wojtukiewicz, Marek
Skoczylas, W. Tomasz
Richter, Piotr
Krawczyk, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1393313.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Index Copernicus International
Tematy:
Gastric Cancer
Helicobacter pylori
Laparotomy
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Immunohistochemistry
Surgical treatment
Panendoscopy
Biopsy
Opis:
The “Polish Research on Gastric Cancer” project has been continued since 1986. The main aim of this project, which is a multicenter and interdisciplinary research, is enhancing the treatment results of gastric cancer patients by developing and promoting the use of optimal methods for diagnosis and treatment, both surgical as well as combined. One of the more important achievements of the project is the development and publication of a document named “Polish Consensus on Treatment of Patients with Gastric Cancer”, whose first version was published in 1998. Following versions were updated adequately to changing trends in the proceedings in patients with gastric cancer. A scientific symposium on “Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer – update 2016” was held in 3-4 June 2016 in Cracow. During the symposium a panel session was held during which all authors publicly presented the Consensus assumptions to be discussed further. Moreover, the already mentioned session was preceded by a correspondence as well as a working meeting in order to consolidate the position. It has to be underlined that the directions and guidelines included in the Consensus are not the arbitrarily assumed rules of conduct in a legal aspect and as such every doctor/team of doctors is entitled to make different decisions as long as they are beneficial to a patient with gastric cancer. The Consensus discusses as follows: a) recommended qualifications (stage of advancement, pathological, lymph node topography and the extent of lymphadenectomy, division of cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), b) rules for diagnostics including recommendations regarding endoscopic examination and clinical evaluation of the advancement stage, c) recommendations regarding surgical treatment (extent of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, tactics of proceedings in cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), d) recommendations regarding combined treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, e) place of endoscopic and less invasive surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer. This publication is a summary of the arrangements made in the panel session during the abovementioned scientific symposium in Cracow in 2016.
Źródło:
Polish Journal of Surgery; 2017, 89, 5; 59-73
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:
Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Guidelines of the Association of Polish Surgeons and the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology on the accreditation of healthcare centers providing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for primary and secondary peritoneal cancers
Autorzy:
Jastrzębski, Tomasz
Richter, Piotr
Zegarski, Wojciech
Dziki, Adam
Wallner, Grzegorz
Jeziorski, Arkadiusz
Wysocki, Wojciech
Jackowski, Marek
Bębenek, Marek
Olesiński, Tomasz
Polkowski, Wojciech
Wyrwicz, Lucjan
Wydra, Dariusz
Biernat, Wojciech
Czauderna, Piotr
Studniarek, Michał
Polec, Tomasz
Owczuk, Radosław
Sommer, Anna
Szewczyk, Krzysztof
Mielko, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1391728.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Index Copernicus International
Tematy:
accreditation
cytoreduction
HIPEC
peritoneal cancer
quality of treatment
Opis:
Surgical interventions in patients with peritoneal metastases combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and systemic treatment are becoming more common and, when applied to selected patient groups, they reach 5-year survival rates of 32–52%. Good clinical outcomes require experienced and well-equipped healthcare centers, experienced surgical team and adequate patient qualification process. As a result of the discussion on the need for evaluation of quality of care and treatment outcomes and at the request of the Peritoneal Cancer Section of the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology, accreditation standards have been developed and the Accreditation Committee has been established for healthcare centers providing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the management of primary and secondary peritoneal cancers.
Źródło:
Polish Journal of Surgery; 2020, 92, 4; 47-53
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:
Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies