Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "cultural translation" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Tożsamość Čefura w polskim przekładzie powieści Gorana Vojnovicia pt. "Čefurji raus!"
Identiteta Čefurja v prevodu romana Gorana Vojnovića "Čefurji raus!"
Čefur’s identity in translation of Goran Vojnovic’s novel entitled "Čefurji raus!"
Autorzy:
Gawlak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486852.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-10-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
bariery kulturowe w tłumaczeniu
tożsamość w przekładzie
Goran Vojnović
polskie przekłady literatury słoweńskiej
Tomasz Łukaszewicz
kulturne bariere v prevodu
identiteta v prevodu
poljski prevodi slovenske literature
cultural barrier in the translation
identity in the translation
Polish translations of the Slovenian literature
Opis:
Roman Gorana Vojnovića "Čefurji raus!" v poljskem prevodu Tomasza Łukaszewicza je za poljskega bralca nedvomno priložnost za soočenje s kulturno drugačnostjo, hkrati pa pred njim odpira pomembno problematiko iskanja identitete v okvirih večkulturnosti. Prevajalec se je lotil zelo težke in ambiciozne naloge. Težave, s katerimi se je moral soočiti, so v primeru prevajanja romana, ki se loteva problematike večkulturnosti in subkulture, multiplicirane. Primerjalna analiza izvirnika in prevoda romana je pokazala, da dobiva identiteta čefurja v prevodu univerzalnejše poteze kot v izvirniku. Do tega je prišlo predvsem zaradi kulturne bariere, ki jo predstavlja za prevajalca v primeru tega romana velika raznolikost jezika, pač glede na narodnostno pripadnost literarnih junakov. Ta diferenciacija je nosilka bistvenih informacij in izvir identifikacije junakov, kar pa je v prevodu zreducirano. Žal ni se prevajalec potrudil, da bi individualiziral govorico junakov z raznimi rejestri jezika in različno močjo slenga, komizma ali vulgarizma. Nekatere prevajalčeve odločitve tudi ali zaostrujejo opozicijo svoji — tuji, na podlagi katere junaki definirajo svoj odnos do okolice in oblikujejo lastno identiteto, ali pa poudarjajo familiarni značaj relacij, obstoječih na obrobju čefurske družbe. Na stilistični ravni je jezik junakov vulgarnejši in skromnejši glede števila komičnih elementov, zaradi česar se zdi čefur v poljski recepciji bolj obscen in manj senzibilen. Omenjene premike signalizirajo nezadostljive retorično-pragmatične kompetence prevajalca. Zaradi nastalih pomenskih izgub postanejo izrazitejše univerzalne lastnosti junaka, roman pa se zdi za sekundarnega sprejemnika atraktiven — saj se z obravnavano problematiko lažje poistoveti.
Goran Vojnovic’s novel "Čefurji raus!" in Tomasz Łukaszewicz’s Polish translation is undoubtedly an opportunity to commune with cultural otherness, and, simultaneously, it touches upon the issue of seeking one’s identity in the face of multiculturalism. The translator undertook a very difficult and ambitious task. In the translation of the novel, which deals with the issue of multiculturalism and subculture, the difficulties the translator is confronted with are being multiplied. The comparative analysis of the original and the translation of the novel reveals that Čefur’s identity in the translation has gained more universal frames than in the original. It is mainly because of the cultural barrier which, for the translator, is a strong differentiation between main characters’ language in terms of their nationality. It is a means of conveying vital information as well as a source of characters’ identification which in the original is reduced. Unfortunately the translator did not make an attempt to individualize the characters’ speech using, for example, different language registers or elements of slang, humour, or vulgarity. At the same time, some of the translator’s choices either sharpen the opposition friend-stranger on the basis of which the characters define their attitude to the surroundings and shape their own identity or enhance the familiar character of the relations which take place within Čefurian community. At the stylistic level, the main characters’ language is more crude and limited in comic elements. And thus, in the Polish context, Čefur appears to be more obscene and less sensitive. These displacements give evidence to the translator’s inefficient rhetorical and pragmatic abilities. Despite the fact that, as a consequence of semantic losses the universal features of the main character’s identity are clearer, the novel may become attractive to secondary readers because of the possibility of identification with the analysed issue.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2012, 3, 1; 13-31
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wartość komentarza w przekładzie (na przykładzie literatury słoweńskiej)
The value of comment in Translation: the example of Slovenian literature
Vrednost komentarja v prevodu (primer slovenske literature)
Autorzy:
Gawlak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/486914.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
paratekst
komentarz
tłumaczenie
literatura słoweńska
komunikacja międzykulturowa
paratext
comment
translation
Slovenian literature
cross-cultural communication
paratekst, komentar, prevajanje, slovenska književnost, medkulturna komunikacija
Opis:
The article deals with the role of comment (as a kind of paratext), which gains a particular status in translation, becoming an additional medium between the author/translator/editor and the primary text and the secondary recipient as well as their cultural universe. This seems important because the translated text is to function in a new environment, a new cultural space; it is supposed to find its way to a new audience, and thus this type of expressions “support” translation in its most important role of a link in cross-cultural communication. The role, nature, and importance of paratext-comments (introductions, prefaces, postscripts) have been examined in the context of translations of Slovenian literature in Poland basing on selected examples. Both the comments of experts-researchers, as well as interpreters themselves, have been taken into consideration. The author notes that, from the ethical point of view, a commentary becomes contributive to the slow process of the recipient realizing the presence of an interpreter and inter-subjective nature of translation, extracts the unfamiliar categories of perception and understanding of the world, brings them closer, making the gesture of seeking “imagined communities”.
Članek obravnava vlogo komentarja (kot vrsto parateksta), ki pridobi svojevrsten status v prevodu, tako da postane dodatna oblika posredovanja med avtorjem / prevajalcem / založnikom in izvirnim besedilom ter naslovnikom prevoda in njegovim kulturnim univerzumom. To se zdi pomembno, saj naj bi prevedeno besedilo zaživelo v novem okolju in kulturnem prostoru, našlo naj bi pot do novega občinstva, torej taka vrsta izraza “podpira” prevod v njegovi verjetno najbolj pomembni vlogi posrednika v medkulturni komunikaciji. vloga, značaj in pomen paratekstov-komentarjev (uvodov, predgovorov, pripisov) so bili proučevani v okviru prevodov slovenske literature na Poljskem, in sicer na podlagi izbranih primerov. Upoštevani so bili komentarji tako raziskovalcev-strokovnjakov kot tudi samih prevajalcev. avtorica ugotavlja, da komentar v etičnem pogledu prispeva k počasnemu procesu uzaveščenja naslovnika o prevajalčevi prisotnosti in intersubjektivnega značaja prevoda, pridobiva neznane kategorije dojemanja in razumevanja sveta, jih približuje, s tem pa išče “pojmovno skupnost” (“imagined commu- nities”).
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2017, 8, 1; 57-69
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przekłady literatury słoweńskiej w Polsce w latach 2007—2013 — komentarz
Prevodi slovenske literature na Poljskem v letih od 2007 do 2013 — komentar
Slovenian literature translations published in Poland between 2007—2013 — the commentary
Autorzy:
Gawlak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/487039.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-01
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
przekład literacki
recepcja literatury słoweńskiej
polityka kulturalna
przekłady w Polsce
literarno prevajanje
recepcija slovenske literature
kulturna politika
prevodi na Poljskem
literary translation
Reception of Slovenian literature
cultural politics
translations in Poland
Opis:
Komentar predstavlja prevode slovenske literature, izdane na Poljskem v letih 2007—2013. V tem obdobju so izšli prevodi slovenske proze (mdr. Jančarja, Virka, Žabota, Mazzinija , Vojnovića, Möderndorferja, Frančiča, Novakove) in poezije (mdr. Šalamuna, Čučnika, Kosovela, Franči ča, Osojnika, Kušarjeve) — tako v knjižni obliki kot tudi v revijalnih in časopisnih objavah. Izšle so še druge publikacije, kot so antologije ter zvezki, ki so sad prevajalskih delavnic. Komentar zajema knjižne izdaje, saj prav te oblikujejo literarno zavest sekundarne kulture. Razveseljivo je, da trenutno lahko opazimo vse več objav prevodov slovenske literature, saj se povečuje tudi potreba po dopolnitvi in izostritvi slike slovenske kulture v zavesti poljskega prejemnika, nekega »kulturnega stereotipa«, ki ga bralci usvajajo s prihajajočimi besedili. Kar zadeva recepcijo, se zdi ključnega pomena, da so prevodi slovenskih avtorjev izšli v samozaložbah ali pri lokalnih založnikih (z izjemo Jančarja, Virka in Čučnika). Razvidno je, da bi bilo koristno ustanoviti dosledno kulturno in založniško politiko ter zagotoviti ustrezno širitveno strategijo, ki bi prispevala k okrepljenemu in razširjenemu tvornemu dialogu med slovensko in poljsko literaturo.
The commentary constitues a presentation of Slovenian literature translations published in Poland between 2007—2013. In mentioned period of time the translation of prose (among others written by Jančar, Virk, Žabot, Mazzini, Vojnovic, Möderndorfer, Frančič, Novak) and Slovenian poetry (Šalamun, Čučnik, Kosovel, Frančič, Osojnik, Kušar) appeared both as independent book publications as well as texts presented in periodicals and regular press. Also publications printed as anthology and releases which were a result of translation workshops were developed. In the commentary the author’s concern focuses mainly on books publications due to the fact that they are shaping the literary awareness of secondary culture. It is comforting that presently the increasing tendency for publishing translations of Slovenian literature can be observed. There is a growing need to strengthen and complement the image of Slovenian culture in the Polish reader’s consciousness, a kind of “cultural stereotype” which the reading community assimilate along with the growth of another texts. From the perspective of reception the most important issue seems to be that translations of Slovenian authors (besides Jančar, Virk and Čučnik) were published by independent, local and niche publishing houses. It is clearly seen that creating a coherent cultural‑publishing strategy and providing appropriate popularizing strategy would contribute to enriching, creative dialogue between Slovenian and Polish literature.
Źródło:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich; 2014, 5, 2; 209-221
1899-9417
2353-9763
Pojawia się w:
Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies