Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "media coverage" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
MEDIATISATION OF DEMOCRACY - IS THIS THE END OF FREEDOM?
Autorzy:
Górka, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/594448.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
media coverage
democracy
manipulation
political system
political representation
Opis:
The role of the public sphere has increasingly come to the fore in studies concerning the state of democracy in Europe. Similarly the role of culture in formations and transformations not only of personal but of political identities as well has attracted attention. It is the purpose of this article to bring these areas together in a comprehensive approach to media, culture and democracy with a view of the public sphere as a crucial mediating field. Article focuses on the role of media in sustaining and developing democracy, a democratic dialogue and in fulfilling the role of media as the critical watchdog of the political system and other powerful players on the European scene. The concept of knowledge democracy is meant to enable a new focus on the relationships between knowledge production and dissemination, the functioning of the media and our democratic institutions. The emerging concept of knowledge democracy moreover obliges us to realise that the institutional frameworks of today’s societies may appear to be deficient as far as the above mentioned undercurrents, trends and other developments demand change. Democracy is without a doubt the most successful governance concept for societies during the last two centuries. It is a strong brand, even used by rulers who do not meet any democratic criterion. Representation gradually became the predominant mechanism by which the population at large, through elections, provides a body with a general authorization to take decisions in all public domains for a certain period of time. Fragmentation of values has lead to individualisation, to uniqueness but thereby also to the impossibility of being represented in a general manner by a single actor such as a member of parliament. More fundamentally media-politics destroy the original meaning of representation.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2014, 43; 275-297
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przywództwo polityczne Jarosława Kaczyńskiego i Donalda Tuska w latach 2005-2011. Wybrane aspekty
Political leadership of Jarosław Kaczyński and Donald Tusk in the years 2005-2011. Selected of aspects
Autorzy:
Górka, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/567076.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Instytut Nauk Politycznych
Tematy:
przywództwo partyjne
relacje w mediach
kampania wyborcza
rywalizacja polityczna
wizerunek publiczny
party leadership
media coverage
election campaign
political rivalries
public image
Opis:
Since 2005, political life in Poland has been dominated by two competing ideologies of the post-Solidarity formation. Electoral races between the post-Solidarity parties of the PO and PiS have revealed more than just the new face of political divisions. A dynamic and emotional struggle has been reflected in the different styles of party leadership. The increasing role of the media in political competition illuminates the important role of political actors by incorporating society as a passive viewer. Democratic elections, for political parties, are the real measure of approval and popularity for their political leaders. Kaczyński's opposite vision of the state of Poland “liberal” and “social”, also affects the divisions among the electorate. Finally, the results of the election contest undoubtedly affect the public's image of the two leaders, who dominate the public discourse due to the large amount of focused attention by the mass media. Consequently, the public's attention is captured and influenced by the views and political attitudes of its constituencies. Tusk and Kaczyński have the ability to mobilize and inspire many voters, they are masters at engaging the publics' hearts and minds. However there are limits, including that neither leader accepts people stronger than himself. Each feels that strong people pose a threat to their personal position. Their leadership styles are not indifferent to the quality of the political system, but the current model of leadership oscillates between the myth of martyrdom, the rhetoric of populism and passive vagueness.
Źródło:
Forum Politologiczne; 2013, 15 - Przywództwo polityczne w Polsce i na świecie; 177-205
1734-1698
Pojawia się w:
Forum Politologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies