Temat: private/public - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Kontrowersje wokół normatywnego podziału na osoby prawne publiczne i osoby prawne prywatne (kan. 116 KPK)
Controversies over normative division into public and private juridical persons (can. 116 CIC)
Autorzy:: Dzierżon, Ginter
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/554684.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:: public juridical person
private juridical person
system of law
canon law
Church
Opis:: In the presented article, the focus of the author’s attention is the question of the differentiating criteria for public and private juridical persons. By analysing such premises as the purposes of the persons and the way they are fulfilled he proves that these criteria are of ambivalent nature. As the author believes, this results from the fact that in the canonical system the public area of the Church has its implications on the entire legal reality.
Źródło:: Annales Canonici; 2014, 10; 43-56
1895-0620
Pojawia się w:: Annales Canonici
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Zasady generalne dotyczące połączenia osób prawnych w kanonicznym porządku prawnym
General Principles Concerning Aggregates of Juridic Persons in the Canonical Legal Order
Autorzy:: Dzierżon, Ginter
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1879506.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: system kanoniczny
połączenie osób prawnych
publiczna osoba prawna
prywatna osoba prawna
canonical system
aggregate of juridic persons
public juridic person
private juridic person
Opis:: The author of the presented article focused his attention on the issue of principal rules concerning aggregates of juridic persons in the canonical legal order. The analyses he carried out show that canon 121 CIC includes only dispositions regarding aggregates of public juridic persons. This approach to the problem, as the author suggests, results from the predominant doctrine of 1917 Code which accentuates the public nature of the canonical legal order. The author also believes that ignoring the dispositions concerning aggregates of private persons in canon 121 CIC should be considered as fully justified. The book of general norms (lex generalis) includes codified general solutions applicable in both code and non-code areas of law. On the other hand, the functioning of private juridic persons within the canonical legal order is characterized by significant autonomy. Because of the nature of such subjects, codifying the solutions regarding this type of aggregate of persons would be senseless. Moreover, the author took the position that the canonical system also allows mixed aggregates of persons, i.e. joining private and public juridic persons. This kind of fusion may result in forming both public and private juridic persons.
Źródło:: Kościół i Prawo; 2014, 3 (16) nr 2; 9-19
0208-7928
2544-5804
Pojawia się w:: Kościół i Prawo
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Zasady generalne dotyczące podziału osób prawnych w kanonicznym porządku prawnym
General Rules Concerningthe Division of Juridic Persons in the Canonical Legal Order
Autorzy:: Dzierżon, Ginter
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/503393.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:: podział osób prawnych
publiczne osoby prawne
prywatne osoby prawne
kanoniczny porządek prawny
division of juridic persons
public juridic persons
private juridic persons
canonical legal order
Opis:: The author of the presented article focused his attention on the question of general principles concerning the division of juridic persons in the canonical legal order. He proved that within can. 122 CIC the legislator only discussed the problem of the division of public juridic persons but did not include any solutions concerning the division of private juridic persons. According to the author, there are two reasons behind this. Firstly, this approach to the problem results from the dominant doctrine of 1917 Code which put particular stress on the public nature of the canonical legal order. Secondly, it results from the fact that private persons have much autonomy in the canonical system. In his interpretation of can. 122 CIC the author points out that the ecclesial legislator clearly refrains from adopting mathematical criteria of division and makes final decision dependant on discretional competent power or executor established by this power. The author believes it is a right approach since using mathematical criteria of division would restrict the power in making appropriate actions. Before making a decision on the basis of criteria specified in can. 122, nr 1–2 CIC the competent power should also take into consideration the specificity of the position in which persons being divided are or will be.
Źródło:: Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2014, 23, 2; 67-75
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:: Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "private/public" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język