Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 25
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tryb rozpatrywania przedłożonego przez Radę Języka Polskiego „Sprawozdania o stanie ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017”
Procedure for considering the “Report on the state of protection of the Polish language in 2016–2017” submitted by the Polish Language Council
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215979.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Polish language
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The report, submitted by the Council for the Polish Language, entitled “Language of political information”, contains an analysis of the problem that is narrow in scope. In the light of the current parliamentary practice, the narrow scope of the Council’s reports is typical and this has not been questioned in the course of parliamentary work. The decision of the Culture and Media Committee, resulting in a refusal to consider the document in question, is an expression of negation of the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to recognize this document as a report. Formally, the committee proceedings on the report had not been completed. The Committee should return to examining this document and complete its work, formulating an appropriate opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 69-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 184 ust. 3 pkt 9 regulaminu Sejmu
A legal opinion on the interpretation of Article. 184 paragraph. 3 point 9 of the Standing Orders
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6567755.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
voting
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
Points of order may be raised only in respect of “technical and organizational” matters being the subject of the orders of the day or the proceedings in a sitting. A exclusive subject of a point of order concerning altering the procedure for voting is to choose one of the methods of the vote, as provided for in Article 188 paras. 2 and 3 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 3(47); 179-183
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 175 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 175 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the specific questions
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6583387.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm
Deputy
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion concerns the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to expel a Deputy from a sitting, taken pursuant to Article. 175 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, such decision is not final, as the Presidium of the Sejm may quash it, having considered an appeal submitted by the Deputy and – on the other hand – is immediately applicable, because the expelled Deputy is obliged to leave the Chamber and abstain from participating in further deliberations until his/her appeal is considered (or until the end of the session of the Sejm, if the Deputy has not submitted an appeal). Therefore, the expelled member does not have the right to participate in voting. Preventing the Deputy expelled from the sitting from “entering the Chamber with the purpose of voting” is necessary in order to respect Article 176 para. 6 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 206-210
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dopuszczalność dokonania przez Marszałka Sejmu ponownej oceny formalnej petycji w sytuacji, gdy wicemarszałek Sejmu upoważniony do wykonywania zadań Marszałka związanych z petycjami odmówił przekazania jej do rozpatrzenia
Admissibility of conducting by the Marshal of the Sejm a formal re‑assessment of a petition in a situation when the Vice-Marshal of the Sejm authorized to perform the tasks of the Marshal related to petitions refused to submit it for consideration
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2193753.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
Marshal of the Sejm
Vice-Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The Vice-Marshal of the Sejm, who has been authorized by the Marshal of the Sejm to take action in matters related to petitions, does not exercise the competence to assess petitions on his own, but does so on behalf of the Marshal. This action should therefore be assessed, as if it were performed personally by the Marshal of the Sejm. The provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm do not provide for the possibility of re-assessment of petitions. Consequently, the petitioner’s request to re-examine the petition in order to possibly amend the decision to leave it unexamined cannot be satisfied.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 1(73); 75-80
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie rozpatrzenia przez komisję dwóch wniosków o przeprowadzenie kontroli w trybie art. 161 ust. 1 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the consideration by a committee of two motions to carry out a control pursuant to Article 161 para. 1 of Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215730.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
committee of the Sejm
scrutiny
national defence
Opis:
The subject of the opinion is the admissibility of consideration by a committee of motions to carry out a control in connection with the lack of general principles of carrying it out set out in the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Motions to carry out the control submitted to the National Defence Committee stay within the scope of the subject matter of activities of the committee. The author claims that one of the motions rises some concerns of a legal nature. The subject of the request was defined in a problem way, whereas committee’s control relates to enforcement and executing statutes and Sejm resolutions, what leads to a conclusion that the scope of the control should be related to a given act or resolution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 3(55); 51-56
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie zakresu uprawnień przedstawiciela Komisji Ustawodawczej w pracach innych komisji nad projektem ustawy – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on the scope of the powers of the Legislative Committee’s representative in the work of other committees on the bill – according to the specific questions
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542811.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
legislative proceedings
lawmaking process
term of office of the Sejm
Opis:
The Deputy who represents the Legislative Committee may participate in the legislative work of a subcommittee set up within another committee but, then, he/she has the status of “regular” Deputy who is not a member of that subcommittee. The author stresses that the status of the representative of the Legislative Committee is specified by the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Moreover, he points out that the Deputy who is both a representative of the Legislative Committee and a member of the committee appropriate for the bill, cannot participate in voting on motions and amendments, which he/she submitted, acting as a representative of the Legislative Committee. There are no obstacles for the Deputy to participate in other votings. During the work of the committee, it should be determined in each case whether the Deputy fulfilling the two above‑mentioned functions acts in the capacity of a member of the committee, or as a representative of the Legislative Committee.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 76-83
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wniosku o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji sejmowej, złożonego w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on a motion to summon a meeting of a Sejm committee, submitted under Article 152 (2) of the Standing Orders – in response to in-depth questions
Autorzy:
Wrona, Zbigniew
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855243.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
radio and television
Standing Orders of the Sejm
telecommunications
Opis:
The opinion deals with the powers of a Sejm committee to demand that the minister and a member of the State institution provide information about pending administrative proceedings and to require the committee to take position in relation to such proceedings. In the authors’ view, there are no provisions under which the motion would be found inadmissible. The committee may also express its position on the discussed issue which, however, has no binding character, and it cannot impose the content of a solution in pending administrative proceedings.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 60-67
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wniosku grupy posłów, złożonego w trybie art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu, o zwołanie posiedzenia Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka
Legal opinion on a motion to convene a meeting of the Justice and Human Rights Committee, submitted by a group of Deputies under Article 152 (2) of the Standing Orders
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855200.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Constitution
parliamentary control
independence of courts
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion deals with a motion to convene a meeting of a Sejm committee to consider the consequences of a particular court decision. In the author’s view, the subject matter of the motion is outside the scope of a committee’s competence as provided in the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Therefore, the motion is defective and the convening of a committee meeting to consider the abovementioned matter is inadmissible.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 52-59
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności przeprowadzenia wysłuchania publicznego w odniesieniu do części projektu ustawy budżetowej
Legal opinion on the admissibility of holding a public hearing in relation to individual parts of draft budgets
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16711504.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
public hearing
State budget
Sejm committees
legislative procedure
Opis:
The article deals with the question whether, in the context of the power of appropriate Sejm committees to consider individual parts of draft budgets, as referred to in Article 106 paragraph 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, it is admissible to submit a motion for and to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing (Article 70a of the Standing Orders of the Sejm). Based on the analysis of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, the author draws a conclusion that Sejm committees do not have such a power. According to the Standing Orders of the Sejm, in the course of work on a draft budget, an exclusive right to adopt resolution on holding a public hearing belongs to the Public Finances Committee.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 4(36); 87-89
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności przeprowadzenia wysłuchania publicznego w odniesieniu do części projektu ustawy budżetowej
Legal opinion concerning the admissibility of holding a public hearing with re‑ gard to a part of a budgetary bill
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16539489.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
standing orders of the Sejm
public hearing
State budget
committees of the Sejm
bill
legislative process
Opis:
Committees of the Sejm which, according to Article 106 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, consider respective parts of a budgetary bill, are not entitled to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing. In the course of work on the budgetary bill only the Public Finances Committee may be classified as “the committee to which the bill has been referred for consideration”, i.e. as an entity which, according to Article 70a para. 2 of the Standing Orders, possesses an exclusive right to adopt a resolution on holding a public hearing (in the phase of work specified in Article 70a para. 4 of the Standing Orders.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 1(33); 76-78
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie zakresu kompetencji przewodniczącego oraz Prezydium Komisji Odpowiedzialności Konstytucyjnej
Legal opinion on the scope of competence of chairperson and presidium of the Constitutional Accountability Committee
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6567744.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Accountability Committee
Sejm Committee
constitutional accountability
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Tribunal of State
Opis:
The opinion points out that a key role in the preparation of preliminary motions to hold persons accountable before the Tribunal of State is played by the Constitutional Accountability Committee acting in corpore. The Commission has an exclusive power to take substantive decisions concerning the conduct of proceedings relating, e.g., to an assessment of the validity of the submitted motions as to evidence. The tasks of presidium and chairperson of the Committee are, in principle, limited to organizational and technical issues, such as planning a timetable of committee meetings and proposing the agenda of the debate (presidium) and representing the Committee in external events, as well as hearing witnesses and experts (chairperson). The performance of the presidium or chairperson is reviewed by the Committee. In the event of a negative assessment of the work of these authorities, the Committee has the power to make appropriate changes in membership of the presidium, including changing its chairperson.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 3(47); 78-83
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontynuowanie przez Komisję do Spraw Petycji postępowań w sprawie petycji, które zostały wszczęte w poprzedniej kadencji
The continuation of proceedings by the Committee on Petitions regarding petitions that were submitted in the course of a previous term
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
discontinuation
Opis:
In the opinion of the author, the principle of discontinunity in relation to “petition proceedings” does not apply to acts carried out as part of the work of the Committee on Petitions. This should also apply to those activities of the Commission that follow the choice of how to handle the petition, e.g. to prepare projects or desiderates as part of dealing with a given petition. Petitions that were considered in the previous term of office should be reconsidered, while the Commission in the current term is not bound by the arrangements made in the previous term of the Sejm. It is not permissible to renew the legislative initiative in the event of the draft submitted by the Committee on Petitions of the previous term was discontinued at the end of the term.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 1(65); 57-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykładnia art. 47 ust. 2 pkt 1 regulaminu Sejmu – tryb rozpatrywania poprawek w komisjach
Interpretation of the Article 47 para. 2 subpara. 1 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the procedure for considering amendments in committees
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215774.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
committee of the Sejm
amendment
legislative procedure
Opis:
The analysis concerns the issue of whether a committee considering, based on the indicated provision, amendments submitted during the second reading, should vote on their acceptance or rejection separately for each amendment, or if it is possible, after consideration of the amendment, to automatically (without separate vote) draw a recommendation concerning other amendments, in case it is a logical consequence of acceptance or rejection of the former amendment. The author assessed that there are no obstacles to apply, at this stage of legislative work, per analogiam the institution of the third-reading voting applied in the first instance to the “most far-reaching amendments”, i.e. those whose adoption or rejection determines decision concerning other amendments.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 45-49
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości ewentualnego podjęcia przez Prezydium Sejmu uchwały wykładniczej dotyczącej ograniczania liczby interpelacji i zapytań poselskich w tej samej „sprawie”
Legal opinion on possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12236964.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation |
Deputy’s question
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Presidium of the Sejm
parliamentary oversight
Deputy
Opis:
Examining the possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”, the author of the opinion concludes that any restrictions in this regard should be formulated with caution. The rights of Deputies to submit interpellations cannot be only illusory. He also notes that the Standing Orders of the Sejm have already introduced a mechanism for control by the Presidium of the Sejm over interpellations and Deputy’s questions. In order to counter the practice of submitting excessive number of interpellations of similar content to the same body, the author examines the possibility of combining by the Presidium of the Sejm similar interpellations into one interpellation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 73-79
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 25

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies