Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę ": Lublin" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12
    Tytuł:
    Kogo na sejmie lubelskim reprezentował Augustyn Rotundus Mieleski (†1582), wójt wileński i sekretarz królewski?
    Who did the Vogt of Vilnius, Royal Secretary Augustinus Rotundus Mieleski (†1582) represent at the Sejm of Lublin?
    Autorzy:
    Ragauskas, Aivas
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648103.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Unia Lubelska
    sejm lubelski 1569 r.
    Lublin
    Wilno
    wójt wileński
    sekretarz królewski
    Augustyn Rotundus Mieleski
    Union of Lublin
    Sejm of Lublin of 1569
    Vilnius
    Vogt
    of Vilnius
    Royal Secretary
    Augustinus Rotundus Mieleski
    Opis:
    The Vogt of Vilnius, Royal Secretary Augustinus Rotundus (the Rotund, Mieleski) was present at the Sejm of Lublin in 1569 at the initiative of the Lithuanian Chancellor and Vilnius Voivode Mikołaj “the Red” Radziwiłł. He participated in the Sejm as the Royal Secretary and Counsellor of the Lithuanian delegation, as well as a renowned historian and an experienced lawyer. Rotundus remained in close relations with the Radziwiłłs, perhaps even as a cliens. Likewise, in his capacity of notary public, Rotundus was the proxy of the Bishop of Vilnius Walerian Protasewicz. Thus, the Vogt of Vilnius was not a member of the Lithuanian delegation or a representative of the city of Vilnius. He could not be the latter due to the specificity of the office of the vogt – until the beginning of the 17 th century the vogt of Vilnius was not elected by the magistrate; he was the king’s representative in the city. As a Royal Secretary, harbouring aspirations to nobility, Rotundus (originating from a bourgeois family in Wieluń) did not want to be identified with the city. Nevertheless, Rotundus has served Vilnius well through his behind-the-scenes activities to the benefit of the city.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 122-139
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kościół prawosławny w dobie Unii Lubelskiej. Kryzys czy początek odrodzenia?
    The Orthodox Church in the era of the Union of Lublin. A crisis or the beginning of a revival?
    Autorzy:
    Gil, Andrzej
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16539284.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Kościół prawosławny
    Unia Lubelska
    Kryzys Kościoła
    reforma Kościoła
    Union of Lublin 1569
    Orthodox Church
    Kiev Metropolis
    crisis
    Opis:
    The Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian state of the 16th century was organized under a unified and hierarchical structure of the Kiev Metropolis. Theoretically, it was subordinated to its Mother Church in Constantinople, in practice, however, it was almost fully autonomous with regard to its internal operation; in terms of organization and property, it was embedded in the social and economic system of the state of its time. Historiography to date has generally accepted the thesis about the multi-faceted crisis that the Orthodox in the Kiev Metropolis were supposed to be experiencing. This crisis was to intensify especially after the Union of Lublin in 1569, when fundamental structural changes were effected within the monarchy ruled by Sigismund Augustus. Transfer of four voivodeships from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, in which the Orthodox Ruthenian population was an important (and sometimes dominant) constituent part, into the borders of the Crown (the Kingdom of Poland), was to be the foundation on which Polish state administration and great landowners intended to build a new religious reality, primarily through the expulsion of the local Orthodox Church. An analysis of the situation of the Kiev Metropolis in the second half of the 16th century shows that its condition did not differ significantly from what was happening in the Polish Catholic Church at the time. As far as the economic foundations are concerned, the Orthodox Church in the Commonwealth after 1569 owned assets sufficient to perform its function in every extent required by church law and custom, especially since it had institutional support, namely the ktetor system. The period following the Union of Lublin was also characterized by an expansion of Orthodox Church structures, especially at the level or parishes, whose number increased significantly. Artistic and spiritual culture flourished, as is clearly evident in the extant examples of icons, sacral architecture, liturgical books and theological literature. New forms of activity of the faithful (laymen) have emerged, such as Orthodox brotherhoods. Therefore, in my opinion, the Kiev Metropolis in the second half of the 16th century did not differ from other religious communities, both in the Commonwealth and in other countries of Central and Eastern Europe. The only crisis that really affected it at the time was a crisis of growth.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 185-195
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Unia Lubelska we współczesnej ukraińskiej historiografii i dydaktyce
    The Union of Lublin in contemporary Ukrainian historiography and didactics
    Autorzy:
    Biłous, Natalia
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647206.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Unia Lubelska
    historiografia ukraińska
    dydaktyka
    nauczanie historii
    Union of Lublin
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    Ukraine
    historiography
    history textbooks
    Opis:
    In Ukrainian historiography, treatment of the significance and aftermath of the Union of Lublin depended on ideological priorities of the time. In the 19 th and 20 th century historians were united by a sustained anti-Polish attitude. As early as in the 19th century, the scholars built an image of Poland as the main “stranger” in Ukrainian history. This negative image survived throughout the 20th century and passed into the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to examine various historiographic problems and stereotypes related to the Union of Lublin in the last 25 years and evolution, i.e. transformation, of the views of Ukrainian historians and textbook authors regarding this landmark event. Soviet historiography borrowed the negative assessment of the Union of Lublin and its consequences for Ukraine from the “national” concept of Mykhailo Hrushevsky and, going further, added new stereotypes to it. In the mid-1990s we observe a departure from the model introduced by Hrushevsky and the Soviet model of writing about history. As a result of the new political realities, some emphases in historiography have shifted, the evaluations of events have changed slightly, and historians have outlined new, neutral evaluations of the union. Over the past ten years, a number of modern works by Ukrainian researchers have emerged, appreciating the common heritage of Poland and Ukraine, especially from the history of parliamentarianism, ideology, identity and culture, the history of the nobility, the bourgeoisie and the Cossacks, which have their roots in the Union of Lublin, when the Ukrainian lands became part of the former Commonwealth. In 2019, in connection with the 450th anniversary of the Union of Lublin, interest in this event among the Ukrainian public has increased. A scholarly conference was held with the support of the Polish Institute in Kiev. Unfortunately, new views of historians have not affected the content of most textbooks for secondary and tertiary schools. They still describe the Union of Lublin along the lines of the “best” Soviet models. In recent years, state policy in Ukraine has been aimed primarily at overcoming myths about the 20th century. Therefore, much attention is paid to the content of the recent history books, while the events of the 16th–17th century remain in its “shadow”. Although ideological formulas and stereotypes of national and Soviet historiography have been partly incorporated into contemporary textbooks, some positive changes in the assessment of the consequences of the Union of Lublin are already visible. The topic of the Union of Lublin is well suited for developing critical thinking among pupils and students. It allows them to form their own assessment, based on facts, sources and the latest research by historians.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 273-291
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wincentego Skrzetuskiego litewskie rozdwojenie jaźni. Litwa wobec Korony w Rzeczypospolitej XVI–XVIII wieku
    Lithuanian split personality of Wincenty Skrzetuski. Lithuania versus the Crown in the Commonwealth of the 16th–18th century
    Autorzy:
    Zakrzewski, Andrzej
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647388.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Wincenty Skrzetuski
    Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
    Litwa
    Korona Polska
    Polska
    Rzeczpospolita
    szlachta polska
    Lithuania
    Crown
    Union of Lublin
    Commonwealth
    Opis:
    Piarist Wincenty Skrzetuski, author of the most popular, at the end of the 18th century, compendium of knowledge about the system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, noted that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was one of its three provinces, alongside Małopolska and Wielkopolska. At the same time, he treated Lithuania, due to its separate treasury, army, law and system of courts and ministers, as an equal part of the Commonwealth. The Grand Duchy has indeed evolved significantly from the 16th century onwards. Not only its elites, but gradually the nobility too were acquiring a sense of belonging to the Commonwealth. Similar processes can be observed with regard to the Crown nobility. Thus, a single political nation of the Commonwealth was being formed. During the reign of King Stanisław August Poniatowski, an accelerated modernization took place, accompanied by a cautious – unfinished – unification of both parts of the Polish-Lithuanian state. For the purposes of political tactics, the Lithuanians and the Crowners used the term “province” very flexibly; both as a state and its province (part of it). From the legal point of view, both of these concepts could be justified. Wincenty Skrzetuski thus reproduced in his compendium the reality of political practice.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 259-272
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Unia Lubelska aktem założycielskim Rzeczypospolitej
    The Union of Lublin as a founding act of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    Autorzy:
    Krochmal, Jacek
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647667.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    unia lubelska
    Rzeczpospolita
    unie polsko-litewskie
    Union of Lublin
    Polish-Lithuanian unions
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    Central Archive of Historical Records
    AGAD
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 13-64
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dokument Unii Lubelskiej w Archiwum Głównym Akt Dawnych
    The document of the Union of Lublin in the Central Archive of Historical Records
    Autorzy:
    Wajs, Hubert
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648080.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Unia Lubelska
    AGAD
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    dokument unii lubelskiej
    UNESCO
    Central Archive of Historical Records
    parchment documents
    Union of Lublin
    Opis:
    It took King Sigismund Augustus the entire decade of the 1560s to bring the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania together. The plan was finalized on 1st of July 1569 at the General Sejm in Lublin. Before that, intense negotiations were held for almost three weeks, from 10th to 27th of June 1569. The conclusion of the agreement was completed by the exchange of acts of the union by both parties and the confirmation issued by the king, according to the “script” from Vilnius dated 24th March 1569. Evidence of those events is preserved in the only surviving parchment document of the Union of Lublin. It is the copy that the Lithuanian side has presented to the Polish side, authenticating it with 78 wax seals. The document is preserved in the Central Archive of Historical Records in Warsaw, in the Collection of Parchment Records, no. 5627. Before World War II, the document was viewed by professors Władysław Semkowicz and Stanisław Kutrzeba, publishers of the source edition Akta unii Polski z Litwą 1385–1791 [Records of the Poland-Lithuania Union 1385–1791] (Kraków 1932). At that time they saw two other acts of the Union of Lublin, which they also published in their book. Those were: the Union document presented by the Polish side to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (with 140 seals) and the so-called Original No. 2 (with 63 seals) of the Lithuanian document (i.e. the extant one). The article attempts to reconstruct the work of the Polish Crown Chancellery, operating under the supervision of Vice-Chancellor Franciszek Krasiński, which between 29 th June and 1 st July 1569 prepared these documents and organized their sealing by several hundred signatories. In the text, special attention is given – as Władysław Semkowicz and Stanisław Kutrzeba have already done – to the differences between the two documents of the Lithuanian side (the extant one and the lost one).
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 165-175
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Unia Lubelska a problem rywalizacji o przywództwo w elicie politycznej Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
    The Union of Lublin and the problem of competition for leadership within the political elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
    Autorzy:
    Kempa, Tomasz
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648085.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Union of Lublin
    magnates
    elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
    Sigismund II Augustus
    Unia lubelska
    magnateria
    elita Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
    Zygmunt II August
    Opis:
    The paper presents the problem of power struggle among the leading Lithuanian magnates in the context of the preparation and conclusion of the Union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania with the Crown of Poland in 1569. Three centres contended to play a major role in Lithuanian policy before the Union of Lublin: The Radziwiłłs, with their undisputed leader – Chancellor, and Voivode of Vilnius, Mikołaj known as “the Red”; the Chodkiewicz family, among whom the starost of Samogitia, Jan Chodkiewicz, grew to be the most active figure even before the Sejm in Lublin; and a representative of Orthodox Church adherents, Knyaz [prince] Jerzy Olelkowicz Słucki, who did not hold any prestigious offices. The aspirations of Prince Słucki stemmed from the fact that he was the closest relative of Sigismund II Augustus, the last representative of Jagiellonian dynasty on the Polish-Lithuanian throne. While Radziwiłł “the Red” was against the new, stricter union with Poland, the other two magnates opposed him, supporting the idea of a new union. Since the King supported the project of further political rapprochement between Poland and Lithuania since the Sejm of 1562/63, the support for the union brought Chodkiewicz a number of promotions and royal endowments in the 1560s (all the more so as the monarch wanted to pit the Chodkiewicz family against the Radziwiłłs, who were all-powerful in Lithuania at that time). Jan Chodkiewicz was also able to take advantage of the obstruction that “Red” used during the Lublin Sejm (when he forced the Lithuanians to secretly leave Lublin), and it was ultimately he who played a major role in completing negotiations on the union and signing the new union in 1569. Although “Red” did not return to Lublin to finalise the union deliberations, he quickly regained the King’s trust. He was supported by the younger generation of the Radziwiłłs, including his son Krzysztof and his nephew Mikołaj Krzysztof, who had sworn an oath of union in Lublin. Prince Słucki’s plan, on the other hand, failed completely. Słucki, as a result of his absence from the Sejm in Lublin due to illness, lost his chance to gain an exceptional position in the new Senate (as the king’s closest relative). The Union of Lublin did not change the balance of power in Lithuania. Mikołaj “the Red” Radziwiłł and Jan Chodkiewicz remained the most influential Lithuanian magnates in the following years.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 140-161
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Świadectwa o dawnej Polsce w źródłach ormiańskich. Współczesna wzmianka o Unii Lubelskiej
    Mentions of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Kingdom of Poland in Armenian sources. Contemporary mention of Union of Lublin
    Autorzy:
    Mnatsakanyan, Piruz
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647999.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Unia Lubelska
    Ormianie
    Ormianie polscy
    Armenian sources for history of Old Poland
    Kamyanets
    Chronicle
    Armenian community in Old Poland
    Union of Lublin
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 235-258
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dokument Unii Lubelskiej – zagadnienia konserwatorskie
    The Union of Lublin document – preservation aspects
    Autorzy:
    Król-Próba, Justyna
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648079.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    AGAD
    konserwacja pieczęci
    dokument wielopieczętny
    Unia Lubelska
    dokument pergaminowy
    wax seals
    preserved condition
    reasons for damage
    Union of Lublin
    Central Archive of Historical Records
    parchment documents
    Opis:
    The Union of Lublin document, preserved in the Central Archive of Historical Records in Warsaw (in the Collection of Parchment Records, no. 5627) is an extremely valuable relic of great historical significance. In 2015 it was honoured with the European Heritage Label, in 2017 it was included in the UNESCO Memory of the World Register. The 450th anniversary of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, which took place in 2019, was an opportunity to summarize the many years of preservation care exercised over the document by the Central Laboratory for the Preservation of Archival Materials at the Central Archive of Historical Records. Over the years the concept of conservation has gradually changed. Restoration, aimed at restoring the original appearance of the object, gave way to protective and preventive maintenance, which emphasizes extensive documentation of the item and minimizes intervention in its structure. The article presents an outline of the problems regarding the state of preservation and causes of damage to wax seals, which have been discussed and researched in recent years.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 176-182
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    „A niechaj już unijej w skrzyniach nie chowamy” – akty unii lubelskiej i horodelskiej z archiwum Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego w zbiorach Radziwiłłów
    „Let us no longer secrete the Unions in our coffers”. Union of Lublin and Union of Horodło acts from the archives of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Radziwiłłs’ collection
    Autorzy:
    Jankowski, Rafał
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16624571.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    Unia Lubelska
    Unia horodelska
    unie polsko-litewskie
    Radziwiłłowie
    Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
    Archiwum
    Union of Horodło
    Union of Lublin
    Radziwiłł Warsaw Archive
    documentary archive of the Great Duchy of Lithuania
    Opis:
    The article discusses the preservation history of two copies of the Union of Lublin act, the fate of which is unknown. These were: the second copy of the Lithuanian side’s act issued for the Polish Crown and the act of the Union handed over by the Polish side to Lithuanians. In the course of describing the history of the acts of the Union of Lublin, the author also describes the fate of several documents directly related to the Union of Lublin, contained in the Radziwiłł collection. Since the times of Nyasvizh and Kleck fee holder Antoni Wilhelm Radziwiłł (1833–1904), the acts of the Union of Lublin were kept under supervision in a special box which also contained the acts of the Union of Horodło. For this reason, the article also presents the course of preservation of the Union of Horodło. The author of the article puts forward a hypothesis that the acts of both the Union of Horodło and the Union of Lublin from the Radziwiłł collection were burnt in Warsaw together with the Krasiński fee library in the first half of October 1944.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 292-334
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przywileje lubelskie i koncepcja „narodu ruskiego” w polemice prawosławnej (od końca XVI do lat dwudziestych XVII wieku)
    The Lublin Privileges and the Notion of the “Ruthenian Nation” in Polemic Orthodox Narratives (the Late 16th century through the 1620s)
    Autorzy:
    Starczenko, Natalia
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Kotyńska, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648017.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    polemika prawosławna
    Cerkiew prawosławna
    naród ruski
    przywilej lubelski
    Unia Lubelska
    Religious polemics
    privileges granted with the Union of Lublin
    the Volhynian Voivodeship
    the Principality of Kyiv
    princes
    law
    identity
    Opis:
    In the article, the author analyzes the Lublin privileges for the Volhynian lands and the Kiev Principality as an important resource for constructing “the Ruthenian nation” as a political subject in polemical texts created after the Union of Brest (1596). Based on Apokrisis Christophora Philaletha and Palinodiа by Zachariasz Kopystenski and Melecjusz Smotrycki’s works of the early 1620s, the article tracks the meanings with which the polemists imbued the notion of “the Ruthenian nation,” and how they carved the space for the third member on the already established map of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of Two Nations based on the “ancient rights” and the privileges received with the Union of Lublin. The reading of the polemical narratives from this perspective allows to significantly undermine the popular scholarly notion that the Orthodox authors identified “the Ruthenian nation” almost exclusively with the Orthodox population, and its territory with the Kiev Metropolis. The author draws the conclusion that the notion of “the Ruthenian nation” as an amorphous confessional unity of the believers of the “ancient Greek Orthodox faith” was ceding to the political model of “Rus”, based on “its own” laws, “its own” territory, and the virtual authority of its princes. In essence, it was the polemists’ reliance on the Lublin privileges as the legal basis for the existence of the Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth that encouraged them to construct the territorial and legal model of the Ruthenian nation.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 196-221
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    „Ja na to nie zezwalam, ani nie chcę nowego na bracią swą stanowić”. Przywódcy szlacheccy Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego na sejmie lubelskim 1569 roku
    “I do not permit this, and I do not wish to impose anything new on my brothers”. Nobility leaders of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the Sejm of Lublin in 1569
    Autorzy:
    Padalinski, Uładzimir
    Rachuba, Andrzej
    Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648124.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
    Tematy:
    sejm lubelski 1569 r.
    przywódcy polityczni
    Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
    Rzeczpospolita
    szlachta
    demokracja szlachecka
    ruch szlachecki
    nobility movement
    Sejm of Lublin 1569
    political leaders
    Grand Duchy of Lithuania
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
    nobility
    nobility democracy
    Opis:
    The existence of an independent nobility movement in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, separate from the local magnates milieu, is one of the fundamental factors in researching the political system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in early modern times. Without such a nobility movement, it is impossible to speak of the noblemen’s democracy in the 16th –18th century. The article presents the activities of the Lithuanian delegation at the Sejm of Lublin in the summer of 1569. It presents the ideas and demands of the nobility and its political leaders. A group of deputies presented a whole gamut of demands, reflecting the needs and socio-political interests of the minor and middle nobility, to the Sejm. Political leaders who acted as spokespersons for the rights and freedoms of the nobility were the land deputies Malcher Snowski and Mikołaj Stankiewicz-Billewicz. Both of them enjoyed high regard among the nobility. They strived to transform its postulates into concrete parliamentary decisions. Economic independence was an important factor in ensuring their independent political position. The author concludes that in the 1560s an independent movement was established in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania under the slogans of noblemen’s democracy. However, in the second half of the 16th century, the leaders of the nobility movement of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania could only hope to fulfill their aspirations if they were supported either by the monarch or by those magnates who supported the slogans of the noblemen’s democracy.
    Źródło:
    Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 105-121
    9788395630255
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies