Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Constitutional Tribunal," wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 25/131
    Sejm’s draft position on the case ref. no. K 25/13 (BAS‑WPTK‑1756/13)
    Autorzy:
    Brzozowski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542768.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    constitution
    transplantation
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    In this draft position the author points out the conformity of Article 16 para. 3 subparas (1), (3), (4) and (6) of the Act on the removal, storage and transplantation of human bodies, organs and tissue and Article 16 para. 3 subpara. 2 in part containing the phrase “and place”, with Article 47 and Article 51 para. 2, in conjunction with Article 31 para. 3 of the Constitution. According to the author, the proceedings should be discontinued in relation to other issues, due to inadmissibility of issuing a judgment. In justifications, he claims that the provisions referred to by the Human Rights Defender do meet the criterion of necessity within the meaning of the constitutional provision imposing limitations on obtaining, gathering and disclosure of information o citizens by public authorities and, thereby, meet the constitutional standard concerning the right to privacy and its admissible limitations.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 1(41); 365-378
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 12/16
    Sejm draft position on the case concerning the Act on Combating Unfair Competition (Ref. No. K 12/16)
    Autorzy:
    Brzozowski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216699.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitutional Tribunal
    competition
    advertisement
    offences
    Opis:
    In this draft position the author states that one of the provisions of the Act on combating unfair competition, concerning criminal liability for acts of dishonest competition in the field of advertising, is inconsistent with the Constitution. First, it provides an open catalogue of punishable acts, which violates the standard of specificity of criminal law. Second, the required elements of an offence were not sufficiently defined and they leave a subject of law in doubt as to whether his or her actions might result in criminal liability. Declaring the contested provision to be inconsistent with the Constitution eliminates the necessity of examining its conformity with Article 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Since in the examined case the constitutional standard and the international standard are practically the same, the proceedings regarding the latter should be discontinued.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 4(52); 191-211
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 13/15
    Sejm draft position on the case concerning the application of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights on the Act – the Family and Guardianship Code (Ref. No. K 13/15)
    Autorzy:
    Brzozowski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6587637.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    the disabled
    marriage
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    In the proposed draft position the author states that the Sejm does not share the belief of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights that the provisions of Article 12 § 1 and § 2 of the Family and Guardianship Code violate the Constitution in that they lead to humiliation and a justified sense of grievance of people affected by their operation. It has been shown that in this case the law is not a source of harm to the individual, on the contrary – the adopted regulations are aimed at protecting constitutional values, with maximum respect for the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. In the opinion of the author of the draft position, it cannot be found that the arguments of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights – referring generally to social degradation of people affected by mental disabilities, without taking into account the details of construct of marriage ban – meets the high standards required by the Constitutional Tribunal. According to the author, from the considerations contained in the draft position it follows that the above-mentioned provision of the Code is compatible with Article 30 of the Constitution.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 288-308
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 53/13
    Sejm draft position on the case ref. No. K 53/13
    Autorzy:
    Brzozowski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543136.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Constitution
    Minister of National Defence
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Opis:
    The proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal in this case were initiated by a group of Deputies who questioned the constitutionality of some provisions of the Act of 21 June 2013 amending the Act on the Office of the Minister of National Defence and other acts. The Sejm did not share the arguments of the applicant. The abolishment of the posts of the commanders of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Special Forces (and their corresponding commands) accompanied by the creation of the posts of General Commander of the Branches of the Armed Forces and Operational Commander of the Branches of the Armed Forces is within the regulatory discretion of the legislature. The constitutional position of Chief of General Staff has not weakened, and the changes resulting from the Amending Act do not go beyond the framework set by the relevant constitutional provision. Entrusting to the President of the Republic of the competence to appoint – at the request of the Prime Minister – a person “designated for an appointment as Commander‑in‑Chief of the Armed Forces” has a strong constitutional grounds and ensures efficient procedure for filling the position of Commander‑in‑Chief for a period of war. In addition, the procedure in which the amendment was made did not infringe the principle of proper legislation.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 223-258
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies