Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "pożyczka" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Pożyczka morska. Ślepa uliczka zachodniej tradycji prawnej?
Sea Loan. A Dead-End Alley of Western Legal Tradition?
Autorzy:
Blicharz, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/519181.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
Opis:
When considering Roman legal framework a key factor in the discussion about the process of decodification in Europe one cannot overlook some concepts which nowadays are thought to be a mere history. Roman law does not always pass the test of flexibility and economical effectiveness. For example a strong affirmation of personal character of any obligation made Romans reluctant to accept assignment of rights and pactum in favorem tertii which are broadly recognized in the modern civil law. However, it seems not to be a case with pecunia traiecticia, i.e. the sea loan. This special contract of loan had a twofold character: it served to take over the risk of sea transport and to invest in maritime trade. The main idea was quite familiar: just price for any loss incurred due to vis maior. Usus modernus applied it also to land transport. Nevertheless, the sea loan suddenly disappeared at the end of 19th century after a long tradition of being a part of the western legal thought. The author believes that there is a place in the realm of obligations for an ancient, but still a vigorous concept. Pecunia traiecticia was inspiration for two different and more famous contracts: insurance and bottomry loan which dominated its history. However, as such it was more like modern risk-sharing instruments which combine credit, insurance and a bit of speculation. Examination of Roman legal framework and western legal tradition has proved that some ancient concepts even ‘forgotten’ could revive and should be included in the market of ideas while shaping a new order of private law.
Źródło:
Forum Prawnicze; 2013, 1 (15); 28-35
2081-688X
Pojawia się w:
Forum Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konstrukcja prawna pożyczki morskiej w prawie rzymskim a współczesny Project Finance
Autorzy:
Blicharz, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/923819.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
pożyczka morska, Project Finance, warunek, termin, ograniczenie odpowiedzialności
Opis:
Legal Structure of Sea Loan in Roman Law and Modern Project FinanceSea loan or pecunia traiecticia belongs to the heritage of Roman legal thought. It seems to occupy a distinctive position in the conceptual framework of private law and few researchers are interested in investigating it. One of them is Z. Benincasa who has analyzed the topic in her general monography on risk in maritime journeys till the 2nd century AD. This article has been inspired by her book, however it is also the result of own studies on sea loan not only in the ancient Roman law but also in the medieval, modern and contemporary legal thought. Thanks to broad insight into the history of sea loan it was possible to take an approach which was only mentioned before. Namely that Roman sea loan provides the solution which today seems to be present in Project Finance. It was reasonable to start the broad comparison again from ancient Roman law. First of all, it has shown that sea loan served not only as a method of taking over the risk by a creditor, but it was also a kind of speculative investment and opportunity to gain a great profi t from maritime trade. At the same time it enabled a debtor to organize a risky journey. There were two kinds of sea loan. One was a loan given on the condition that a debtor would successfully reach the port of his destination. The other one was a loan with the same condition, but also with an added time limit, e.g. 200 days of navigation – so called dies incertus sensu stricto. Secondly, the profit of a creditor was strictly attached to the gains from maritime trade and depended on the success of a maritime journey. On the one hand, debtors’ personal liability was moved as far as possible, in order to satisfy creditors just from profit or items acquired during the trade expedition. On the other hand, the way to enter into the contract to attach high interests and finally to sue a debtor and his heirs was very flexible. Thirdly, emperors were interested in sea loan and provided in their constitutions balanced position of a creditor and a debtor. It can suggest that pecunia traiecticia was important for Roman economy, maybe in the same way that Project Finance is for our times. This work seeks to broaden previous studies on western legal tradition and Roman law and is an attempt to find out whether the Roman concept of sea loan is applicable also nowadays.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa; 2013, 6, 4; 327-340
2084-4115
2084-4131
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies