Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "tożsamość dziedzictwa" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    DZIEDZICTWO TECHNIKI JAKO CZĄSTKA KULTURY Część I. W nurcie rozwoju zrównoważonego
    THE HERITAGE OF TECHNOLOGY AS A PARTICLE OF CULTURE Part I. Within the Sustainable Development Current
    Autorzy:
    Affelt, Waldemar J.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538276.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    CANON OF 12 IDENTIFIED VALUES
    CONSERVATION
    VALORISATION - NEW METHODS
    zrównoważony rozwój
    zabytki techniki
    deindustrializacja
    heritologia
    zarządzanie zasobami dziedzictwa kultury
    ICOMOS
    TICCIH
    krajobraz kulturowy
    tożsamość kulturalna
    Opis:
    The protection of cultural heritage in the twenty first century is determined by a number of factors (de-industrialisation, progress in information and communication technology, insufficiencies of cultural education, virtualisation of reality and experiences, assumption of many state tasks by selfgovernments, and limited state funds for the conservation of historical monuments). All these processes are more or less concurrent with the principles of sustainable development, proclaimed in 1987, referred to in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland in 1997 and defined in the Statute of 27 April 2001 on the protection of the natural environment. This idea is also taken into account by many international documents enacted in the past twenty years by UNESCO, the Council of Europe, ICOMOS and TICCIH. The key problem consists of a reference of the principles of sustainable development to culture and, in particular, to the protection of cultural heritage resources. A new approach is required by the analysis applied both in relation to non-material phenomena and assorted artefacts. Conservation calls for new methods of valorisation, sufficiently universal to encompass all cultural goods and suitably simple and detailed to be applied in daily research-scientific praxis. Upon the basis of an analysis of international documents and foreign publications the article proposes a methodical valorisation of historical objects, founded on a canon of 12 identified values comprising, respectively, a collection of cultural values relating to the past of a given heritage resource (social identity, authenticity, integrity, uniqueness, historical value and artistic value) as well as a collection of socio-economic values expressing contemporary reality and anticipating the needs of the future generations (social usefulness, functional sustainability, economical value, educational value, aesthetic value and political value). The method should be universal, and the process of rendering precise the analysis arguments and the assessment criteria should depend on the type of resource, i.e. whether it is material or non-material, movable or non-movable, a single monument or a complex, a historical site or a cultural landscape. True, a work of art, monumental architecture and a monument of technology differ, but the names of their potential values should remain identical, expressing the holistic paradigm of culture. Such an interpretation takes into account the strategic target of contemporary conservation-restoration as well as all sorts of revitalizations (regeneration, rehabilitation) of the historical substance, which should invariably comprise a balanced retention of all the values of assorted cultural heritage resources for the future generations, This is a dynamic and complicated social process, taking place in changing economic and political conditions, which frequently involves parties pursuing equally different goals. The protection of historical monuments calls for lively negotiations for the sake of their survival, processes that should be consistently accompanied by a vision of the present-day and future beneficiaries of the values in question.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 4; 60-84
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe w świetle ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego
    Intangible cultural heritage in the light of protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions
    Autorzy:
    Ratajski, Sławomir
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538459.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    UNESCO
    niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
    Konwencja w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego z 2003 roku
    Konwencja w sprawie ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego z 2005 roku
    Konwencja w sprawie ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego z 1972 roku
    Program UNESCO Pamięć Świata
    społeczność lokalna
    tożsamość
    dziedzictwo materialne
    zrównoważony rozwój
    kultura
    dialog pokoju
    dialog kultur
    różnorodność wyrazu kulturowego
    lista reprezentatywna niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego ludzkości
    lista światowego dziedzictwa
    polityka kulturalna
    polityka rozwojowa
    kultura narodowa
    kultura lokalna
    dobra kultury
    przemysły kultury
    Milenijne Cele Rozwoju ONZ
    prawa człowieka
    Opis:
    The article refers to two UNESCO conventions adopted by Poland in recent years: The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003 and the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 2005. On one hand, comparing the content of these documents allows better understanding of the keynote of the concept of safeguarding intangible national heritage applied by UNESCO, and, on the other hand, this guiding principle shows the long distance covered while shaping the vision of cultural heritage over forty years from the establishment of the Convention on Safeguarding the Cultural and Natural Heritage in 1972. To complete the picture, UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” Programme of 1992, concerning safeguarding the documentary heritage, including the digital heritage, must be mentioned. These documents capture the diverse landscape of human cultural heritage, being complementary to each other. They are permeated by the principles of the protection and promotion of the heritage to varying degrees: equality, diversity, equivalency, share in the sustainable development, importance of an individual creator, and also an important role of the local community in this process. They indicate the evolution of the development conditions based on the cultural awareness, sense of identity, formed in the process of gradual identification of one’s own tangible and intangible heritage. They emphasize the possibility of a significant participation of culture in development. The Preamble to the Convention from 2005 contains provisions which formulate principles in a clear way, and also shed light on understanding other UNESCO conventions and programmes, especially on the particularly important Convention from 2003. The principle of non-evaluation, which applies to making new entries on the Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, so difficult to understand in the light of the experience related to the application of the criteria for making new entries on the World Heritage List, in accordance with the Convention on Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage from 1972, gains importance in the perspective of “cultural diversity forming a common heritage of humanity” and being “a mainspring for sustainable development for communities, peoples and nations”. The Convention emphasizes the importance of culture for social cohesion; developmental role of exchanges and interactions between cultures based on freedom of thought, expression and information, as well as diversity of media; the importance of linguistic diversity; the importance of vitality of cultures, including for persons who belong to minorities and indigenous people, as “manifested in their freedom to create, disseminate and distribute their traditional, cultural expressions and to have access thereto, so as to benefit them for their own development”. These statements give special meaning to the main thoughts of the Convention of 2003, which indicates the fundamental importance of the local community and individual carriers in ensuring vitality of the intangible heritage as a basic condition for its protection. Hence the differences in determination of goods added to the lists established on the basis of the Convention of 1972 and of 2003. In the first case, the dominating principle is the principle of selection of the most outstanding works in a given field, based on the methodology determined by specialists using the criteria of European historical and aesthetic tradition. In the case of the Convention of 2003, there was a clear evolution towards the recognition of the values of cultural phenomena rooted in the local context, proving, first of all, the diversity and authenticity of these phenomena, with their significance in creating the culture for the local community and as a manifestation of their identity, and, with the use of tools for the protection of these phenomena/ elements, may participate in the dialogue of cultures on the national and global scale. The process of the implementation of the Convention gives a huge chance to prepare a methodology consistent with the assumptions of the Convention of 2003, by means of activities that aim at creating the national register of the intangible heritage, and thus recognize, disseminate and maintain the richness of intangible culture in Poland which, as a result of a well conducted cultural policy consistent with the principles of the Convention of 2005, should be present in the developmental processes of our country in a creative manner.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 5-18
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies