Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "sophists" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Funkcja i znaczenie prologu w „Protagorasie” Platona (Prot. 309A– 316A)
    The Function and Importance of the Prologue in the Plato’s „Protagoras”
    Autorzy:
    Głodowska, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/648661.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Platonic dialogue
    Socrates
    sophists
    Attic comedy
    dramatic scene
    Opis:
    Plato’s Protagoras belongs to the most read and analyzed works of the philosopher. Interest is aroused not only by the content of the work, but also by its form: diligent composition, elaborate descriptions of characters and dramatic nature of separate scenes, although the work belongs to the group of narrative dialogues. The aim of this article is to analyze the prologue of Protagoras, which consists of five scenes (309a–316a), to answer the question what function they have and how important role they play in this dialogue.
    Źródło:
    Collectanea Philologica; 2019, 22; 5-32
    1733-0319
    2353-0901
    Pojawia się w:
    Collectanea Philologica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    L’anima, il triangolo e la virtù. Sulla figura del paragone implicito nel Menone di Platone
    Soul, Triangle and Virtue. On the Figure of Implicit Comparison in Plato’s Meno
    Autorzy:
    Palumbo, Lidia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938272.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Plato
    sophists
    mimetic art
    visual writing
    teaching
    philosophy and geometry
    Opis:
    Plato’s dialogues can be regarded as the most important documents of the extraordinary mimetic power of visual writing, i.e., writing capable of “showing” and “drawing images” by using words only. Thanks to the great lesson of the Attic theater, Plato makes his readers see: when reading the dialogues, they see not only the characters talking but owing to the visual power of mimetic writing, they also see that which the characters are actually talking about. There are numerous rhetorical devices employed by Plato the writer that make this visual rendering of philosophy possible. In this text, I would like to bring an example from the Meno that illustrates the visual power of an implicit comparison. By “implicit comparison”, I mean the special kind of comparison that is not presented explicitly and fully in the text but that the text merely evokes and that, once evoked, contributes to determining the formation of the image.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2017, 8, 1; 201-212
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Pytanie Eutyfrona. U źródeł teologii filozoficznej i religii naturalnej
    Eutyphro Dilemma. At the root of philosophical theology and natural religion
    Autorzy:
    Chlewicki, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/546252.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Religioznawcze
    Tematy:
    philosophical theology
    natural religion
    Plato
    Socrates
    sophists
    greek enlightenment
    Opis:
    The question asked by Socrates in Plato’s Eutyphro: ’Is the pious dear to the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is dear to the gods?’ can be understood as symbol of a growing tension between religion and philosophy (faith and reason). Additionally, this question is linked to a crucial issue of morality’s foundations because a question ‘what is pious?’ can be interpretated as a question ‘what is morally right?’ in particular religion. Socrates’ question about the meaning of piety not only is important itself but also because of its reason and consequences. It represents the beginning of the process that lead to conclusion that only reason can decide what is pious. This conclusion is an essential feature of the Western thought because it was underlying philosophical theology evolving since Antiquity and natural religion born in Modern Age. The platonic paradigma that only the Good can be divine is applied to both of them. The question I raised in my article has ancient origin. Nevertheless, it is universal and transhistorical question, important for Modern World.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy; 2019, 1/271
    1230-4379
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Z rodowodu klasycznego prawa naturalnego
    From the origin of classical natural law
    Autorzy:
    Szadok-Bratuń, Aleksandra
    Bratuń, Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/911253.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-09-15
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    natural law versus positive law
    sophists
    Socrates
    Plato
    Aristotle
    Opis:
    The issue of natural law has been mentioned by almost all philosophers of law, from the classical ones of ancient Greece to contemporary postmodernists, and is presented in various ways. In compliance with Cicero’s observation that “history is the herald of the future” we have attempted to go back to the sources and to start our considerations ab ovo. The historical review does not address systematically the issue discussed here, and only serves to properly explain what natural law in a classical reflection of ius naturale is. Therefore, our approach to the classical natural law has been narrowed down to three selected sophists, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and their views of ius naturale in opposition to ius positivum have been briefly outlined. The article consists of two parts: the first one entitled From Heraclitus to Socrates and the second entitled From Plato to Aristotle. The first part presents sophists’ views on the law of nature. It is worth noting that sophists did not analyse the essence of the law of nature; they were primarily interested in the relationship of the law of nature to positive law. Thus Socrates, by deriving the existence of universal and unchanging laws from human nature, gave birth to the doctrine of natural law with unchanging content. The second part contains the views of Plato and Aristotle on the question of the law of nature. Plato is considered to have discovered the ideal trend of natural law, although in his dialogues the term “law of nature” is not found. It was the theory of Plato’s ideas that became the model for the concept of lex aeterna as an arrangement of divine ideas. Whereas, Aristotle distinguished two types of good that law puts before man, and accepts them as the basis for the dichotomous division of laws. He described good that is indifferent to man, which due to specific circumstances becomes the object of his desire, as positive law. Good that is closely related to the nature of man, which is always and everywhere the object of his desire, is good indicating the natural law.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2019, 3, 27; 9-27
    2300-3936
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawa Publicznego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Alētheia in Gorgias of Leontini. An Excerpt from the History of Truth
    Autorzy:
    Leeten, Lars
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28408713.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Gorgias of Leontini
    sophists
    history of truth
    alētheia
    Pindar
    Encomium of Helen
    Opis:
    It is often assumed that the concept of alētheia, or ‘truth’, in Gorgias of Leontini belongs to the art of rhetoric. Along these lines, it is usually understood as an aesthetic concept or even a mere ‘adornment’ of speech. In this paper, it is argued, by contrast, that Gorgianic alētheia is a definable criterion of speech figuring in the practice of moral education. While the ‘truth’ of a logos indeed has to be assessed on aesthetic grounds, the underlying concept of alētheia is predominantly ethical. For Gorgias, speech is ‘true’ when it promotes virtue (aretē) by being expressive of virtue. The principle stated in the opening passage of the Encomium of Helen, that a speaker has ‘to praise what is praiseworthy and to blame what is blameworthy’, explains precisely this understanding of alētheia.
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2022, 13, 1; 45-64
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies