Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "scientific misconduct: fabrication" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Po co psychologia?
What is psychology for?
Autorzy:
Brzeziński, Jerzy Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178119.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy
Tematy:
5-year master’s degree
Empirically Based Assessment
antireductionism
empirical research
empirical theory
ethical awareness
falsification
full-time
methodological awareness
plagiarism
program in psychology
psychology
science
scientific misconduct: fabrication
social practice
Opis:
Three main problems are considered. The first is that psychology should avoid any inclination towards neuroscience or a type of brain science. Making use of the achievements of natural sciences, psychology should take into regard the cultural conditions [determinants] and methods worked out in social sciences. Thus, it should adopt the antireductionistic methodological programme. The second problem is that psychology must reject the papers that entice with apparent scientific approach being actually of no real worth. Also the threat posed to psychological practice by pseudo-scientific monographs and pseudo-test should be recognised. They offer scientifically false basis of practical work of psychologists in the sphere of social practice. The third problem is that each psychological practice should be preceded by a psychological theory that is empirical and needs to be verified by a methodologically correct method. Thee underlying empirical psychological theory makes a given psychological practice sensible and ethical. The status of psychology as a science and the status of psychological practice are related to the quality of education of future psychologists. The author definitely opts for the model of full-time 5-year master’s degree studies (so against the Bologna model of 3-year licentiate (BA) followed by a 2-year master’s degree study (MA)), supplemented with a one-year training under supervision of an experienced specialist. The effective and ethical work of professional psychologists in Poland suffers from the lack of legal regulations that would protect this profession against the infiltration of all kinds of charlatans offering pseudo-scientific diagnostic tools like e.g. the Tree test of Charles Koch and therapies like e.g. the Systemic Constellation of Bert Hellinger. Of utmost importance is development of not only methodological awareness but also ethical awareness in psychologists and students of psychology. Moreover, the education should bring the realisation of the effects and danger of scientific misconduct of FFP type, that is fabrication, falsification, plagiarism.
Źródło:
Polskie Forum Psychologiczne; 2014, XIX, 3; 285-304
1642-1043
Pojawia się w:
Polskie Forum Psychologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Fabrication and Falsification of Scientific Research – a Challenge for Legislators or an Irrelevant Issue?
Autorzy:
Skarbek, Oskar
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/47209892.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024-03-15
Wydawca:
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
science
scientific misconduct
fabrication and falsification of research
legal liability of researchers
Opis:
The article addresses the problem of fabrication and falsification of scientific research in the context of the role that lawmakers can play in combating this practice. Legislators may establish organisational units specialising in combating scientific misconduct (also referred to as ‘research misconduct’), having the authority to, for instance, to conduct investigations or recommend penalties. A researcher who commits such misconduct may face not only disciplinary, but also civil, administrative or criminal liability. The article discusses the results of a survey asking 70 Polish academics about their opinion on the role of legislators in countering fabrication and falsification in research. The findings show, for example, that respondents mostly support disciplinary responsibility for such misconduct (81%), and also believe that legislators should combat this practice using ‘soft’ measures, such as promoting codes of ethics in research (70%). Half of those surveyed wanted such behaviour criminalised. According to almost half of the respondents, the Polish legislator does not combat such misconduct effectively.
Źródło:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem; 2024, 16, 1; 200-212
2080-1084
2450-7938
Pojawia się w:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies