Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "FAMILY COURT" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Działalność wychowawcza sądu rodzinnego wobec nieletnich – pomiędzy ideami a praktyką
Correctional Activity of Family Courts for Juveniles: Between Ideas and Practice
Autorzy:
Klaus, Witold
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698904.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
nieletni
działalność wychowawcza
sąd rodzinny
postępowanie sądowe
środki karne
badania katamnestyczne
correctional activity of family court
correctional activity
family court
juvenile
punitive measures
court action
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 2008, XXIX-XXX; 331-347
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nieletni przed sądem rodzinnym według ustawy o postępowaniu w sprawach nieletnich. Stadia postępowania i praktyka orzecznicza w zakresie przeciwdziałania demoralizacji oraz w sprawach o czyny karalne
Minors before a family court according to the juvenile justice l aw. Fields of conduct and c ase-law practice in the area of demoralization counteracting and in criminal cases
Autorzy:
Bartha, Adrian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/499013.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Fundacja Dajemy Dzieciom Siłę
Tematy:
nieletni
czyn karalny
demoralizacja
sąd rodzinny
postępowanie
juvenile
punishment
demoralization
family court
proceedings
Opis:
Nieletni sprawcy czynów zabronionych ponoszą odpowiedzialność sensu largo przede wszystkim na podstawie przepisów Kodeksu karnego bądź ustawy z dnia 26 października 1982 r. o postępowaniu w sprawach nieletnich. Jednak młode osoby do ukończenia 15 lat, które dopuszczą się czynu zabronionego, odpowiadają jedynie z przepisów ustawy. Ich zachowanie może być przejawem demoralizacji lub stanowić czyn karalny. Postępowanie w sprawach nieletnich prowadzi sąd rodzinny. Autor w niniejszym artykule prezentuje model postępowania ujęty w ustawie, jego stadia, właściwość sądową, prawa i obowiązki nieletniego jako strony oraz praktykę orzeczniczą w zakresie stosowania środków służących przeciwdziałaniu demoralizacji i przestępczości nieletnich. Trafność ich doboru ma wszakże prowadzić do osiągnięcia korzystnych zmian w osobowości i zachowaniu się nieletniego w celu zapobieżenia wkroczenia przezeń na drogę przestępstwa i ponoszenia odpowiedzialności już na gruncie Kodeksu karnego.
Juvenile delinquents are responsible primarily for sensu largo under the provisions of the Penal Code or the Law of 26 October 1982 on juvenile delinquency. However, young people up to the age of 15 who commit a prohibited act shall be liable only to the provisions of the Act. Their conduct may be a manifestation of demoralization or a criminal act. Proceedings in juvenile cases are led by family courts. In this article the author presents the model of proceedings included in the law, its stages, jurisdiction, the rights and obligations of minors as a party, and the jurisprudence practice in the application of measures to prevent demoralization and juvenile delinquency. However, the relevance of their choice is to lead to favorable changes in the personality and behavior of minors, in order to prevent them from entering the path of crime and to take responsibility under the penal code.
Źródło:
Dziecko krzywdzone. Teoria, badania, praktyka; 2018, 17, 1; 9 - 29
1644-6526
Pojawia się w:
Dziecko krzywdzone. Teoria, badania, praktyka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Psychospołeczne czynniki wpływające na efektywność pracy sędziów wydziałów rodzinnych i nieletnich
Psychological Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Family and Juvenile Court Judges
Autorzy:
Opora, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699100.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
sąd rodzinny
wymiar sprawiedliwości
nieletni
sąd dla nieletnich
sędziowie
kuratorzy sądowi
psychologia
juvenile justice system
juvenile court judges
family court judges
Opis:
The paper concerns personal and environmental factors influencing the effectiveness of the juvenile justice system. The survey was based on the Polish juvenile justice system, but it concerns the European standards of the treatment of juvenile delinquency. The author also presents the problem in terms of community service which is very closely related to the juvenile justice system in Poland. The causal factor was presented in a graph, which is called the Ishikawa and Pareto graph, a graph of reasons and effects. The survey included 148 Polish juvenile court judges. The results of the research could be useful for improving the Polish juvenile justice system and probably some of the issues could be extrapolated to other country juvenile justice systems.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 2006, XXVIII; 255-266
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
  • odwiedzone
Tytuł:
Praca kuratora dla nieletnich w opinii sędziów sądów rodzinnych i kuratorów społecznych
The opinion of family courts judges and voluntary probation officers on their work
Autorzy:
Wójcik, Dobrochna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699296.pdf
Data publikacji:
1988
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
sąd
sędzia
praca
sąd rodzinny
resocjalizacja
kurator
terapia
nieletni
rodzice
opinia
court
judge
work
family court
resocialization
probation
therapy
minor
parents
opinion
Opis:
The paper contains the results of a questionnaire study carried out on national representative samples of family courts judges (277 persons) and voluntary probation officers (247 persons). The main aim of the study was to obtain the practicians opinion as to the model of probation service existing in Poland and its ideal vision, as well as the conception of the work of a voluntary probation officer with a juvenile delinquent and his milieu and the: effectiveness of such work. comparing the statements of judges and voluntary probation officers, the author intended to find out what opinion the persons who play various parts in the process of resocialization of juveniles have on the educational work of voluntary probation officers: what this work should be and what it actually is. The picture that emerges from the statements of both groups of respondents is not favourable, the appraisals made by family courts judges being more, critical as a rule than those of voluntary probation officers. Some of the respondents statements are declarations and wishes. Over a half of the family courts judges (58 per cent) and about 80 per cent of voluntary probation officers consider the voluntary-cum-professional model of probation service for juvenile delinquents found in our country to be a good one (although only a part of them approve of it fully, with the remaining ones accepting it conditionally and submitting various proposals for its improvement). On the other hand, as many as 42 per cent of judges and about 20 per cent of voluntary probation officers opt for the performance of supervision -by professional probation officers only. To substantiate their standpoint, these persons argue that voluntary probation officers lack qualifications, are insufficiently engaged in educational work with juveniles, and that in their case difficulties arise in executing the proper performance of supervision. Also the enrollment of voluntary probation officers is disapproved of, the examined persons stating that in the face of a small number of applicants for this work, no requirements can be imposed upon them, and many of them are chance persons with no training whatever. As few as 7.6 per cent of family courts judges and as many as 48.6 per cent of voluntary probation officers are of the opinion that probation officers are well prepared to perform their function of resocialization. In the opinion of most respondents, the number of voluntary probation officers is greatly insufficient.                        The author was also interested in the respondents vision of the voluntary probation officer's work with a juvenile and his milieu, the elements that should prevail in this work: education, care or supervision, and the actual situation in this respect, as well as the real course of this work. Most respondents (78 per cent of judges and 52.2 per cent of probation officers) stresed the educational elements of a voluntary -probation officer's activity. :What is alarming, however, is the fact a considerable group both of family courts' judges (21.3 per cent) and of voluntary probation officers (30 per cent) believe formal supervision to be the most important aspect.             Yet as shown by the findings of the study, the actual work of .a voluntary probation. officers departs greatly from the declared ideal model. Voluntary probation officers are burdened with an excessive number of supervised juveniles, with about 30 per .cent of them supervising over 10 persons which is the number set as the maximum. The majority of respondents demand a reduction of the number of juveniles under supervision, which is however difficult to be fulfilled because of the lack of candidates willing to become probation officers. As appears also from the respondents statements, there is no elaborate conception of the voluntary probation officer's work. Too much weight is attached when appraising this work to its formal criteria (e.g. the number of probation officer's contacts with the juvenile). Instead, the quality of his work is inadequately analyzed. Admittedly, both professional probation officers and most of all family courts judges lack sufficient data to carry out such an analysis: namely, the information about a voluntary probation officer's work come from his reports that are frequently faulty as regards quality, contents and promptness; this appears not only from the judge's but also from the voluntary probation officers' own statements.             Co-operation between voluntary probation officers on the one hand, and profesional probation officers and family courts' judges on the other hand, is also faulitly organized. The respondents perceive this co-operation as the opportunity to settle definite legal, educational and organizational matters rather, than as a regular influence of the family court towards an improvement of the voluntary probation officers' qualifications and an increase of their educational impact on the juveniles.             In resocializing activities, great weight is attached to the educational methods applied by the voluntary probation officer. His basic method is considered to be that of individual therapy which should be accompanied by group and environmental therapy. As appears from the statements of most voluntary probation officers, the forms of their work, and of influencing the juvenile in particular, were rather modest and poorly differentiated, the probation officers revealing litt1e initiative and being either relucant or unable to make the contacts with juvniles supervised by them more diversified. As few as about 20 per cent of the examined voluntary probation officers were in good contact with some of their probationers at any rate, the contact being of a therapeutical character (which was important in so- far as over 40 per cent of probation officers stated that they supervised- juveniles with personality disorders). In resocializing work, the posibilities of influence in a group of young persons are insufficiently used. Moreover, voluntary probation officers  meet with many difficulties in co-operating with their probationers families, their contacts with the institutions engaged in crime prevention, education or social assistance being also unsatisfactory. Voluntary probation officers co-operate rather regularly with schools, the police, the Polish Committee for Social Aid and occupational guidance centres only (though naturally the degree of a voluntary probation officer's co-operation with the abovementioned institutions differs).             The respondents of both groups expressed their opinions about the effectiveness of the supervision, its conditions and criteria. In general, views of family courts judges and of volunatry probation officers converged to a high degree, the majority of respondents being of the opinion that nothing but the juvenile's complete and positive participation in the social life and proper performance of due social roles testifies to a successful ending of a supervision.             Convergences could also be found. between the judges and the probation officers opinions about the conditions of success vs. failure of supervision. Discussing successful supervisions respondents of both groups stressed the importance of good relations between the probation officer and his probationer, co-operation with the juvenile’s parents, their emotional commitment and readiness to act jointly with the probation officer, the probation officer's competence in getting into emotional contact with the juvenile and his family and to win their confidence. According to the respondents, the most important factors that determine a failure of supervision are: the juvenile's considerable demoralization, influence of the negative peer group, a negative family milieu and a lack of co-operation. with the probation officer on the part of the parents. Therefore, respondents of both groups lay a great emphasis on the importance of emotional relations which should link the three parties involved: the juvenile, his parents, and the voluntary probation officer. The necessity of mutual approval, understanding and respect for each other’s rights, was particularly stressed. Mutual good emotional relations linking the above-mentioned persons seams to be the key issue as far as success or failure of super- vision is concerned. If both the juvenile and his parents have a favourable attitude towards the probation officer and trust him, it will be much easier for him to persuade the juvenile of the necessity of regular learning or changing his conduct, and his parents-of the need for co-operation. Therefore the findings point to the fact that the declared shape of the work of a voluntary probation officer is much better than the actual one.             The final part of the questionnaire was devoted to the use of educational measures and obligations of juvenile delinquents and their parents resulting from provisions of the Act of Nov. 26, 1982 on the proceedings in cases concerning minors. The Act introduced new educational measures and obligations of juveniles, as well as the possibility of punishing the juvenile's parents with a fine and notifying their workplaces or social organizations they are members of about their failure in parental obligations whenever this failure is caused by the parents fault. About 60-70 per cent of the judges never applied the newly introduced educational measures nor imposed obligations upon juveniles, although over a half of the judges and 60-70 per cent of the voluntary probation officers are convinced that it was right to introduce these new measures. A part of the respondents however (one-fourth of the judges and one-fifth of the probation officers) express their doubts as to the possibilities of the family court's supervision of performance of the obligation imposed upon juveniles. Very few judges applied disciplinary measures towards the juveniles parents in practice, although about 25 per cent of them express an opinion as to the effectiveness of a fine, and about 18 per cent believe that notifying the parents workplace may bring about satisfactory results. As compared with judges, voluntary probation officers expressed their favourable opinion as to the effectiveness of these measures more frequently (44 and 62 per cent respectively).             Because of a relatively short period of binding force of the new provisions (which was about one and a half years at the moment of the study), the problem of application of some of the educational measures and obligations in particular, as well as the judges and probation officers opinion as to their pertinence and the possibilities of supervising their execution should be investigated further.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 1988, XV; 203-249
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt Kodeksu rodzinnego z 2018 roku (refleksje)
The Draft Family Code of 2018 (Reflections)
Autorzy:
Stadniczeńko, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22792470.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-30
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego
Tematy:
projekt kodeksu
rodzina
systematyka aktu
dobro dziecka
adwokat dziecka
sąd rodzinny
draft code
family
systematics of the law
welfare of the child
advocate of the child
family Court
Opis:
Projekt Kodeksu dużą wagę przywiązuje do statusu rodziny i jej funkcji w wychowaniu dziecka. Po raz pierwszy w prawie polskim definiuje się na poziomie ustawy pojęcia: naczelne zasady prawa rodzinnego, dobro dziecka, rodziny, małżeństwo, konkubinat, współdziałanie dla dobra rodziny. Projektowany Kodeks wprowadza również zasadę ochrony rodziny. W tekście projektu Kodeksu odpowiedzialność rodzicielska rozumiana jest jako odpowiedź na dobro dziecka. Podstawowym elementem odpowiedzialności rodzicielskiej jest jej niezbywalność i cechuje ją totalność, co oznacza że rodzic jest odpowiedzialny za to, co leży w granicach jego możliwości. Odnosi się ona do wszystkich aspektów życia dziecka, od zaspokajania jego podstawowych potrzeb fizjologicznych po rozwój umysłowy i emocjonalny oraz kulturowy.
The draft code attaches great importance to the status of the family and its roles in child raising. For the first time in Polish law, the following concepts are defined 154 at the statutory level: the guiding principles of family law, the welfare of the child, family, marriage, cohabitation, cooperation for the good of the family. The draft code also introduces the principle of family protection. In the text of the draft code, parental responsibility is understood as a response to the welfare of the child. The basic element of parental responsibility is its inalienability and it is characterized by totality, which means that the parent is responsible for what lies within the limits of his or her ability. This applies to all aspects of the child’s life, from satisfying its basic physiological needs to fostering its mental, emotional, and cultural development.
Źródło:
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego; 2019, 14, 16 (1); 137-154
2719-3128
2719-7336
Pojawia się w:
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O potrzebie zmian w polskim prawie rozwodowym
Autorzy:
Andrzejewski, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788173.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
małżeństwo
rodzina
rozwód
prawo rozwodowe
sąd rodzinny
prawo rodzinne
postulaty zmian
marriage
family
divorce
divorce law
court of domestic relations
polish divorce law
Opis:
The author discusses an always relevant problem of the model of the procedure for dissolving marriage. The problem is analyzed from the point of view not only of law, but also social sciences, primarily, psychology. He observes a presence of a dominant tendency nowadays to deemphasize the meaning of marriage and family, and to succumb to crisis and file for a divorce for banal reasons. The so called pro-divorce mentality translates into a tendency observed among judges to favour divorce. On the other hand, the author assesses the legal acts referring to divorce cases as reasonable, i.e. neither favoring nor facilitating divorce. Therefore, a need is emphasized to change the approach to the family in a critical situation. He suggests that in a family court instead of settling family legal problems an attempt should be made to solve them. To this effect, in local communities, special groups comprising psychologists, pedagogues, lawyers, social workers and other specialists should be set up. The ultimate goal for the groups would be to try to reconcile the spouses, to help them solve their family problems, including assistance in dealing with all divorce procedures. People dissatisfied with the proposal suggested by such a group might have a right to file a case in court. In court the proceedings should be held in compliance not with the so far applied adversarial principle but with the conciliatory principle.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2016, 3 (207); 99-127
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies