Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "penitentiary law" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Środki zabezpieczające dla sprawców przestępstw popełnionych w związku z uzależnieniem w świetle ustawy z dnia 20 lutego 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks karny oraz niektórych innych ustaw – „noweli lutowej”
    Autorzy:
    Maciej, Tygielski,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902737.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-06-04
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    penal law
    penitentiary law
    preventive measures
    medicalisation of law
    connection between crime and addiction
    compulsory detoxification treatment
    imprisonment for an indefinite period
    prawo karne
    prawo penitencjarne
    środki zabezpieczające
    medykalizacja prawa
    związek czynu z uzależnieniem
    przymusowe leczenie odwykowe
    pozbawienie wolności na czas nieoznaczony
    Opis:
    This article is focused on the actual position of security measures applicable to addicted offenders in the criminal justice system as well as in the Polish penal debate. The most important problems that occurred in this context were: intersection of medical and juridical authorities in administration of justice (with domination of the experts appointed by the court), protection of the inmates rights and the possibilities of reduction of the isolation penalties and introducing forms of penal reaction that are adapted to specific criminal etiology. Reflections regarding the amendment that took effect on the 1 of July 2015 were conducted in the fields of law-abidingness, efficiency and effectiveness of the preventive measures. The obtained results allow to appraise positively such specific solutions in general, but also show their limits, organizational difficulties and potential threats.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2018, 78; 474-496
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O dopuszczalności prowadzenia czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych w jednostkach penitencjarnych
    The Acceptability of Conducting Operational-Identification Activities in Penitentiary Units
    Autorzy:
    Herbowski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698606.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    prawo
    konstytucja
    praworządność
    prawo karne
    law
    constitution
    jurisprudence
    criminal law
    penitentiary units
    operational-identification activites
    Opis:
    For many years, a number of concerns in Poland have been raised about thepossibility of conducting operational-identification activities in police custody andpenal institutions by services responsible for public order. Sometimes even alarmingviewpoints have been formulated about the lack of such activities since the end of the1980s. Appearing in connection with this are postulates about renewed adoption ofthese activities in the Polish prison system. However, this testifies above all to a lack offamiliarity with the field of interest in services eligible for operational activities. Thisalso leads to introducing wider scientific analysis which cannot however restrict itselfto only easily accessible aspects of this topic.Besides the supporters of such activities, there are also determined opponents, andtheir counter accusations are very serious. Operational-identification activities carriedout in penitentiary institutions, in their opinion, adversely affect the achievement of thegoals of imprisonment, as well as the course of the criminal process, and even violate therights of the incarcerated. However, the authors of such statements do not support themwith factual arguments. It seems they result to some extent from negative experiencesendured during the communist era. But one cannot compare the circumstancesand conditions under which activities were carried out in penitentiaries before andafter 1989. So there is no question of returning to practices from the communist era.The sources of this attitude should also be sought, amongst others, in the mistakenperception of operational activities carried out by officers of the prison services. It isnot currently possible, as this would result in a lack of confidence of the condemned inpsychologists and educators, and would consequently thwart their rehabilitation efforts. There currently does not exist any legal basis in the executory penal code allowingthe exclusion of imprisoned individuals from the circle of interest of law enforcementagencies which may exhibit an eagerness to use them in the character of sources of personal information. Nor is there a completely voluntary, above all secret, methodof co-operation for those temporarily arrested and imprisoned with national services,that would rely predominantly on conveying information that interests them, thusdiscerning a contradiction in the rules of the performance of a punishment. The reported postulates for introducing limits in the course of completingoperational-identification activities in penitentiary units have a very generalcharacter and indicate only theoretical acquaintance with the issue. It also seemsthey groundlessly assume ill will and non-observance of the rules of law and orderin the activities for their implementation by police and special services. Operationalactivities are sometimes ethically questionable, but also necessary to fight crime effectively, especially the organised variety. Nor can one forget that the activities of lawenforcement agencies seeking to uncover culprits demand making use of others, whoare often less loyal than in the proceedings of criminal methods. Poland’s constitutionallows for the limiting of the use of rights and civic freedoms when it is essential in thedemocratic state for its safety or to maintain public order, be it for the protection of theenvironment, health and public morality, or for the freedom and rights of other people. Operational-identification activities carried out in penitentiary units satisfactorily passso-called tests of legality, appropriateness and necessity as well as fulfilling a statutoryrequirement for a legal basis for authorising interference in the rights and freedoms ofcitizens.It should be explicitly stated that currently there is a lack of any limits linked tothe location of carrying out operational-identification activities. In connection withthis, all authorised services can also carry them out in penitentiary units, both prisonsand detention centres, without the prison services mediating. This mainly results fromduties put into place by legislators for police and special services that protect the formsand methods used in the course of operational-identification activities. Even if thisduty did not exist, operating officers would certainly not be willing to work with prisonservice officers, fearing the unmasking of their undertaken actions. Among the operational methods used by services authorised to carry them out,the greatest collection of knowledge about criminal groups, including their activitiesand plans, can be gained thanks to co-operation with personal sources of information.It is precisely this method that serves in most cases when acquiring information inpenitentiary units. In practice, however, working with informants sitting in detentioncentres and penal institutions has a subsidiary character, since information is onlyacquired when doing it any other way would be very difficult or even impossible. This iscaused above all by essential problems connected to the appropriate selection, drawingup and carrying out of recruitment or the handling of sources. Therefore, operationalwork in penitentiary units does not have the nature of permanent surveillance.The essential benefits associated with obtaining information from incarceratedpeople have also been demonstrated for many years in countries with establisheddemocracies, such as the US and Canada. This is something which has unfortunatelyescaped the attention of Polish critics of such activities.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2015, XXXVII; 347-368
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Podstawowe kierunki rozwoju systemu penitencjarnego w Polsce
    The prison system of Poland – main trends of development
    Autorzy:
    Szymanowski, Teodor
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962259.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1986
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    system penitencjarny
    więziennictwo
    zakład karny
    kara więzienia
    prawo karne
    penitentiary system
    penology
    penitentiary
    criminal law
    resocialization
    juvenile repeat offenders
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 1986, XIII; 173-221
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Organizacja i funkcjonowanie aresztów policyjnych w Królestwie Polskim w latach 1817–1867. Część I
    Organization and functioning of police detention centres in the Kingdom of Poland in the years 1817–1867. Part I
    Autorzy:
    Bieda, Justyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/533098.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
    Tematy:
    Polish Kingdom
    detention centres
    penitentiary
    criminal law
    history of law
    Królestwo Polskie
    areszty
    penitencjaryzm
    prawo karne
    historia prawa
    Opis:
    Police detention centres were created by the Government Commission of Internal and Police Affairs of October 6, 1817. They were brought to life to provide a suitable place of isolation for people arrested by the police authorities during the first steps of the investigation. However, in the following years they gained further functions as prisons for persons sentenced to short-term imprisonment or as accommodation for transported prisoners. The aim of this study is to present the legal basis for detention in police custody until the Government Commission for Internal Affairs is liquidated (1867) on the basis of administrative regulations issued by central government administration bodies and documents collected in state archives. Unfortunately, the preserved archival material is very fragmentary, it does not allow precise determination of places where police arrests have been organized, or detailed statistics on persons held in these centers. Certainly, however, we can conclude that the police detention centres in the entire period considered were mainly places of detention for police arrested persons, and that the regulations on the time of detention were repeatedly violated.
    Areszty policyjne zostały utworzone na mocy rozporządzenia Komisji Rządowej Spraw Wewnętrznych i Policji z dnia 6 października 1817 r. Powołano je do życia w celu zapewnienia odpowiedniego miejsca odizolowania dla osób aresztowanych przez władze policyjne w trakcie pierwszych czynności śledztwa. Jednakże w następnych latach areszty policyjne zyskały kolejne funkcje – jako więzienia dla osób skazanych na krótkoterminowe kary pozbawienia wolności czy jako miejsca noclegowe dla transportowanych więźniów. Celem opracowania jest przedstawienie podstaw prawnych osadzenia w areszcie policyjnym obowiązujących do roku 1867, czyli do czasu likwidacji Komisji Rządowej Spraw Wewnętrznych. Analizie poddano przepisy administracyjne wydawane przez centralne organyadministracji rządowej oraz dokumenty zgromadzone w archiwach państwowych, Niestety zachowany materiał archiwalny jest bardzo fragmentaryczny i nie pozwala na precyzyjne ustalenie miejsc, w których zorganizowane zostały areszty policyjne, ani sporządzenie szczegółowych statystyk dotyczących osób przetrzymywanych w tych ośrodkach. Z pewnością jednak możemy stwierdzić, iż areszty policyjne w całym badanym okresie pozostawały głównie miejscami przetrzymywania osób aresztowanych policyjnie oraz że nagminnie łamano przepisy o czasie zatrzymania w areszcie.
    Źródło:
    Studia z Dziejów Państwa i Prawa Polskiego; 2019, 22; 107-126
    1733-0335
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia z Dziejów Państwa i Prawa Polskiego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies