Temat: pozbawienie - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Wykonywanie kary pozbawienia wolności w ramach systemu dozoru elektronicznego a konstytucyjna zasada równości wobec prawa
Autorzy:: Białowąs, Ewa
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/525275.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2011-03-31
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:: pozbawienie wolności
dozór elektroniczny
Opis:: W niniejszym artykule omówiono ustawę o wykonaniu kary pozbawienia wolności w ramach systemu dozoru elektronicznego, oraz projekt jej nowelizacji. Wskazano na ich mankamenty, a w szczególności na naruszenie zasady równości wobec prawa wyrażonej w art. 32 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP, z uwagi na etapowość jej wprowadzania i nie objęcia nią w jednym czasie skazanych na terytorium całego państwa. Autorka zastanawia się także nad tym czy ustawa, oraz jej nowela, chociaż częściowo przyczynią się do rozwiązania problemu przeludnienia w polskich jednostkach penitencjarnych, oraz zapobiegną zjawisku długotrwałego oczekiwania skazanych na odbycie kary. A zatem czy przyniosą one korzyści w wymiarze społecznym.
The article discusses the Execution of the Penalty of Deprivation of Liberty within a System of Electronic Monitoring Act and its draft amendment. It demonstrates its drawbacks, in particular the contravention of the principle of equality under the law, expressed in art. 32, section 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This contravention stems from the gradual implementation of the Act, which would not apply to every convicted person in Poland at the same time. The author also questions whether the Act and its amendment will, at least partially, help to solve the problem of overpopulated Polish prisons and long delays for convicts waiting to serve their sentence. Namely, the author considers whether the Act will beget social improvements.
Źródło:: Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2011, 1 (5); 179-204
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:: Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Trójstronność przestępstwa wzięcia zakładnika. O niemożności kumulowania roli zakładnika oraz podmiotu szantażowanego
Tripartism of the offense of taking a hostage. On the impossibility of becoming a hostage in ones own case
Autorzy:: Giezek, Jacek
Lipiński, Konrad
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2170036.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022
Wydawca:: Instytut Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości
Tematy:: zakładnik
zmuszanie
pozbawienie wolności
hostage
coercion
deprivation of liberty
Opis:: Autorzy poruszają kwestię konstrukcji przestępstwa wzięcia zakładnika, próbując udzielić odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy możliwe jest stwierdzenie realizacji znamion typu czynu zabronionego z art. 252 k.k. w sytuacji, w której podmiotem zmuszanym do określonego zachowania się miałby być sam zakładnik. Posługując się argumentami o charakterze językowym oraz systemowym, formułują odpowiedź przeczącą. Wynika ona przede wszystkim ze słownikowej definicji terminu „zakładnik”, jak również z kontekstu prawnomiędzynarodowego, który narzucił wprowadzenie konstrukcji ujętej w art. 252 do Kodeksu karnego.
The authors raise the issue of the structure of the offense of taking a hostage, trying to answer the question of whether it is possible to conclude that the offense under Art. 252 CC would be committed in a situation where the subject compelled to behave in a certain manner is the hostage itself. Using linguistic and systemic arguments, they answer the question in the negative way. This is mainly due to the dictionary definition of the term “hostage”, as well as the international legal context which imposed the introduction of Art. 252 (offense of taking a hostage) to the Criminal Code.
Źródło:: Prawo w Działaniu; 2022, 49; 9-17
2084-1906
2657-4691
Pojawia się w:: Prawo w Działaniu
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Poczucie winy u skazanych odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności.
The feeling of guilt among convicts who serve their sentence.
Autorzy:: Florczykiewicz, Janina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1202457.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Stosowanych Nauk Społecznych i Resocjalizacji. Instytut Profilaktyki Społecznej i Resocjalizacji
Tematy:: poczucie winy
pozbawienie wolności
zakład karny
demoralizacja
feeling of guilt
imprisonment
prison
demoralization
Opis:: W artykule zaprezentowano badania nad poczuciem winy u skazanych odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności. Badano zależność między poczuciem a stopniem demoralizacji. Badaniami objęto 296 skazanych, mężczyzn w wieku od 18. do 64. roku życia, odbywających kary pozbawienia wolności w różnych typach i rodzajach zakładów karnych. Ustalono, że znaczna część osadzonych odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności przeżywa poczucie winy spowodowane wyrządzeniem krzywdy ofiarom swoich przestępstw. Najniższa skłonność do przeżywania winy oraz najwyższe tendencje do ignorowania ofiary i uruchamiania neutralizacji wystąpiła u osób zdemoralizowanych w wysokim stopniu.
The article presents the findings of the study on the feeling of guild among convicts who serve their sentence. We investigated the relation between the feeling of guilt and the level of demoralization. The study involved 298 male inmates, aged 18 to 64, who serve their sentence in different types and kinds of prisons. It was found that a significant proportion of convicts who serve their sentence experience the feeling of guilt for the harm caused to the victims of their crimes. The lowest propensity to experience guilt and the highest tendency to ignore the victim and start neutralization were manifest among individuals who show a high level of demoralization.
Źródło:: Profilaktyka Społeczna i Resocjalizacja; 2015, 27; 65-87
2300-3952
Pojawia się w:: Profilaktyka Społeczna i Resocjalizacja
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Krótkotrwałe formy pozbawienia wolności w ujęciu konstytucyjnym i ustawowym
The Short-term Forms of Deprivation of Liberty in Constitutional and Statutory Terms
Autorzy:: Laskowski, Borys
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32076754.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2024-04-30
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:: detention
constitutional human freedom
deprivation of liberty
pre-trial detention
zatrzymanie
pozbawienie wolności
konstytucyjna wolność człowieka
tymczasowe aresztowanie
Opis:: The thesis is devoted to the subject of deprivation of liberty and contains an overview of forms of detention as the short-term coercive measures while indicating the limitations of their use resulting from functional, practical and legal conditions. The author, using the research method of analyzing legal acts and case law, systematically presents the existing types of deprivation of liberty against the background of the provisions of various legal acts and their location in the constitutional order. The work asks research questions about the possibility of limiting personal freedom, the multiplicity of such restrictions and their purposefulness. The author presents a conclusion that the possibilities of depriving a person of liberty under Polish law are very broad and granted to a significant number of entities.
Praca jest poświęcona tematyce pozbawienia wolności i zawiera przegląd form zatrzymania jako krótkotrwałych środków przymusu przy jednoczesnym wskazaniu ograniczeń ich stosowania wynikających z uwarunkowań funkcjonalnych, praktycznych i prawnych. Wyróżnione zostało tymczasowe aresztowania jako jedyna możliwa forma pozbawienia wolności, z założenia krótkotrwała, która może przekształcić się w długotrwałą. Autor posługując się metodą badawczą analizy aktów prawnych oraz orzecznictwa dokonuje systematyki istniejących rodzajów pozbawienia wolności na tle przepisów różnych aktów prawnych oraz ich umiejscowienia w porządku konstytucyjnym. W pracy stawiane są pytania badawcze o możliwość ograniczenia wolności osobistej, wielość takich ograniczeń oraz ich celowość. Autor dochodzi do przekonania, że możliwości pozbawienia wolności człowieka na gruncie prawa polskiego są bardzo szerokie i przyznane znacznej liczbie podmiotów.
Źródło:: Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2024, 2(78); 91-101
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:: Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Revocation of conditional release in the Polish Executive Penal Code
ODWOŁANIE WARUNKOWEGO ZWOLNIENIA W POLSKIM PRAWIE KARNYM WYKONAWCZYM
Autorzy:: Stefańska, Blanka
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1390874.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2017-06-30
Wydawca:: Uczelnia Łazarskiego. Oficyna Wydawnicza
Tematy:: probation period
legal order
imprisonment
conviction
conditional release
sentence
okres próby
porządek prawy
pozbawienie wolności
skazanie
warunkowe
zwolnienie
wyrok
Opis:: Przedmiotem artykułu jest odwołanie warunkowego zwolnienia od odbycia kary pozbawienia wolności. Zwolnienie następuje na okres próby, w trakcie której sprawdzane jest zachowanie skazanego pod kątem jego przystosowania do życia w społeczeństwie. Naruszenie przez niego szeroko pojętego porządku prawnego skutkuje – w zależności od wagi jego naruszenia – obligatoryjnym lub fakultatywnym odwołaniem warunkowego zwolnienia. Szczegółowo omówione są przyczyny powodujące lub pozwalające na odwołanie warunkowego zwolnienia.
The article discusses the revocation of conditional release from the imprisonment penalty. The release is for a probation period during which a convict’s behaviour is monitored in order to check if he has re-adjusted to life in the society. His violation of the legal order in its broad meaning, depending on the significance of this violation, results in the obligatory or optional revocation of the conditional release. The article presents thoroughly the circumstances that result or may result in the revocation of the conditional release.
Źródło:: Ius Novum; 2017, 11, 2; 44-60
1897-5577
Pojawia się w:: Ius Novum
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Kara pozbawienia wolności w protokołach Wydziału Karnego Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej II RP oraz w kodeksie karnym z 1932 r.
The penalty of imprisonment in the protocols of the criminal division of the Codification Commission of the Second Polish Republic and in the Criminal Code of 1932
Autorzy:: Trybus, Małgorzata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31348399.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: criminal code
Codification Commission
alternative sentence of imprisonment
Makarewicz Criminal Code
kodeks karny
Komisja Kodyfikacyjna
pozbawienie wolności
kodeks karny Makarewicza
Opis:: Katalog kar zasadniczych w kodeksie karnym z 1932 r. obejmował dwie kary pozbawienia wolności, tj. więzienie i areszt. Kara więzienia miała przede wszystkim za cel resocjalizację sprawców. Szczególną jej odmianą była kara dożywotniego pozbawienia wolności. Z kolei areszt uznawano za karę względnie izolacyjną o charakterze przymusowo-zapobiegawczym. Traktowano go również jako surogat niehańbiącej kary pozbawienia wolności. W artykule przybliżono rozważania prowadzone w trakcie obrad Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej II RP, Wydział Karny (Prawo materialne), dotyczące wskazanych form reakcji karnej na przestępstwo, jak również przedstawiono te kary w świetle przepisów kodeksu karnego Makarewicza.
The catalogue of basic punishments in the 1932 Criminal Code included two types of imprisonment, i.e. prison and jail. The main purpose of prisons was to rehabilitate offenders. A particular variant of this punishment was life imprisonment. On the other hand, the jail was considered a punishment of relative isolation which was coercive and preventive in nature. It was also treated as a surrogate for non-degrading penalty of imprisonment. The purpose of the paper is also to portray the deliberations of the Codification Commission of the Second Polish Republic, its Criminal Division (Substantive Law), concerning the indicated forms of criminal reactions to a crime as well as to present these punishments in light of the provisions of the Makarewicz Criminal Code.
Źródło:: Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne; 2023, 75, 2; 89-102
0070-2471
Pojawia się w:: Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Zakład karny i wykonanie kary pozbawienia wolności w opinii społeczności lokalnej
Prison and Imprisonment in the Opinion of Local Community
Autorzy:: Mościskier, Andrzej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699182.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1984
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:: zakład karny
wykonanie kary
kara
pozbawienie wolności
opinia społeczna
społeczność lokalna
penitentiary
execution of a sentence
imprisonment
public opinion
local community
Opis:: Basically, the study concers three problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment. Secondly the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected. Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an the citizens’ feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend to differentiate their answers. The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other. In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons. In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons. The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information. As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over 50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention. However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person, provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed. Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most general statement that „in prison, strict discipline should reign”. When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated, if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict those given to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons. Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy. Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals. The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
Basically, the study concers three problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment. Secondly the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected. Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an the citizens’ feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend to differentiate their answers. The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other. In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons. In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons. The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information. As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over 50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention. However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person, provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed. Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most general statement that „in prison, strict discipline should reign”. When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated, if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict those given to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons. Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy. Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals. The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
Źródło:: Archiwum Kryminologii; 1984, XI; 245-267
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:: Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 14 października 2015 roku – I KZP 7/15.
Gloss to the resolution of The Supreme Court of 14 October 2015 – file ref. No. I KZP 7/15
Autorzy:: Słotwińska, Karolina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1596386.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2016
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:: limitation
criminal law
international law
deprivation of liberty
a crime against humanity
zbrodnia przeciwko ludzkości
prawo międzynarodowe
pozbawienie wolności
przedawnienie
prawo karne
Opis:: Podjęty w glosie problem dotyczy możliwości uznania za „zbrodnię przeciwko ludzkości” (a w konsekwencji również wyłączenia biegu przedawnienia karalności) czynu zabronionego, który nie spełnia ustawowych przesłanek wskazanych w art. 118a § 2 pkt 2 k.k. Na potrzeby przeprowadzonych analiz, nakreślono niezbędny kontekst związany z ustaleniem skutków niezgodności zachodzącej pomiędzy ratyfikowaną umową międzynarodową a ustawą karną.
Gloss to the resolution of the Supreme Court of 14 October 2015 of file ref. no. I KZP 7/15. Main problem of a gloss is the possibility of recognition for the „crime against humanity” and, as a result – the exclusion of the limitation period, of an offense that does not meet the statutory conditions laid down in art. 118a § 2 pt. 2 Polish Penal Code. Second problem is relations between the incompatibility of a ratified international agreement and criminal law.
Źródło:: Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2016, 13, 1; 79-90
2083-4373
2545-3181
Pojawia się w:: Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: W poszukiwaniu skutecznych metod resocjalizacji sprawców pozbawionych wolności na przykładzie Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki
In Search of Effective Methods of Prison Rehabilitation – An Example of the United States
Autorzy:: Szwejkowska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698767.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:: resocjalizacja
cele kary izolacyjnej
pozbawienie wolności
osadzony
RNR Model
ocena aktuarialna
zagrożenie recydywą
rehabilitation
objectives of a punishment
imprisonment
inmate
Risk-Need-Responsivity Model (RNR)
assessment
relapse into crime
Opis:: In its introduction, the article characterises - in a most comprehensible way - themain objectives of criminal sanctions and their role in preventing crime, according tothe most commonly expressed opinions on the subject from American scholars. It isfollowed by a brief history of assessing the risk of committing an offence in the UnitedStates in recent decades. The risk assessment process was developed before World WarII as a tool to predict possible recidivism in the case of inmates released on parole, butit has been in more common use since 1980s. While the “What works?” movementinitially emerged in the United States, one needs to remember the publication of Robert Martinso’s report that created the “Nothing works” (concerning prison rehabilitation)doctrine. It aided the justification of severe changes in punitive prison policies inthe 1970s that continued well into the 1990s, with the slogans “tough on crime, toughon the causes of crime” being more prominent. It took more than a decade to reestablishsome hope in prison rehabilitation programmes and allow the paradigm shiftsto happen – from the retribution “being tough on offenders” policy to more creativeapproaches towards offenders. By constructive approaches to working with offenders,one means the use of effective methods and techniques to alter criminal behaviourof inmates to prevent their possible relapse into crime (crime prevention).The main goal of the article is to present the most fundamental system in the UScriminal justice system that is most commonly applied nowadays: the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model and its principles to offender assessment. The aforementionedprinciples were laid down by Canadian scholars, Donald Arthur Andrews andJames Bonta. In that model, “risk” means the identification of specific factors thatare associated with recidivism (in general, depending on a specific crime, e.g. sexualoffenders or offenders who committed violent crimes). Andrews and Bonta argue thata number of factors need to be considered in any comprehensive theory of criminalbehaviour, including biological or neurological issues, inheritance, temperamentand social and cultural factors, while also noting that criminal behaviour is a multifactorialissue. “Need” assesses criminogenic needs and targets them in prison treatmentprogrammes for elimination, while “responsivity” intends to maximise the offender’sability to learn how to combat possible recidivism through rehabilitative intervention,providing cognitive behavioural treatment – with the said intervention being tailoredto the learning style, motivation, abilities and strengths of the offender.Risk assessment is applied during different stages of the criminal procedure: beforesentencing and during the period of time when the criminal sanction is executed, i.e.while serving a custodial sentence. It must be noted that, in the US justice system, judgesare not the only people obliged to assess the potential risk of an offender relapsinginto crime in the future. Prison officers are also tasked with such assessment. Throughthe application of the RNR model, it is possible for the prison staff to divide inmatesinto specific groups, depending on security levels and adequate treatment programmes.In that case, the assessment tools based on the RNR model not only allow a predictionof a possible relapse into crime, but also a proper allocation of convicts to rehabilitationprogrammes provided within prisons. A convict undergoes an evaluation before andafter the treatment. Such evaluations are imposed on most prisoners, so performingthem does have an impact on the financial and human resources of a given penitentiaryunit.The most important question, “What works in prison?” is answered by the majorityof scholars through propositions of providing cognitive and behavioural skill programmesto the convicts. They have clear criteria to ensure that objectives, methods andapplication of rehabilitation programmes correspond with the needs of criminaloffenders. The conclusion of the research is meant to prove that providing offenders with such treatment (based upon the RNR model) may have a positive effect on re -ducing the risk of relapse into crime in the future. However, the appropriate methodsof treatment are based not only on psychotherapy (or, sometimes, on pharmacologicaltreatment), but also on education, vocational training, personal development, strengtheningself-control mechanisms and improving interpersonal skills.
Źródło:: Archiwum Kryminologii; 2018, XL; 431-458
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:: Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: Stosowanie środków specjalnych – nadzoru ochronnego i ośrodka przystosowania społecznego – wobec recydywistów skazanych w warunkach art. 60 k.k.
Employment of special measures (protective supervision and social readaptation centre) towards recidivists coming under art. 60 of the Penal Code
Autorzy:: Rzeplińska, Irena
Szamota, Barbara
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699046.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1982
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:: recydywista
środki specjalne
nadzór ochronny
przystosowanie społeczne
sąd penitencjarny
przestępczość
zwolnienie warunkowe
pozbawienie wolności
kara
recidivist
special measures
protective supervision
social adaptation
penitentiary court
criminality
parole
deprivation of liberty
penalty
Opis:: The Penal Code of 1969 introduced in Chapter VIII a complex of regulations defining the criminal liability tfor offences committed in the conditions of special recidivism. Two categories of special recidivism were introduced: basic recidivism (Art. 60 § 1 of the Penal Code) and multiple recidivism (Art. 60 § 2 of the Penal Code). To assume the first category, the following criteria are required: 1) commission of an intentional offence similar to the previous one, 2) execution of at least 6 months of imprisonment, 3) commission of a new offence within 5 years after discharge from prison. To impute the offender the commission of an offence coming under the second category of recidivism, the following conditions are necessary: 1) conviction for at least the fourth time, in this twice under the conditions of basic special recidivism, 2) repeated commision of an intentional offence to profit financially or of hooligan character, 3) total imprisonment of at least one year, 4) commission of a new offence within 5 years after the last imprisonment. For each of those two categories of recidivism, the principles of aggravated criminal liability are fixed by the Code, and they refer to less - serious - offences only. Towards persons coming under Art. 60 § 1 and 2, imprisonment within the raised limits is adjudicated. Towards such persons, absolute suppression of suspension of the execution of penalty was formulated. The strictness of these regulations is partly diminished by Art. 61 of the Penal Code, which created the possibility to depart from the aggravation of penalty as expressed in Art. 60, in "particularly justified cases, when even the lowest penalty inflicted on the basis of Art. 60 § 1 and 2 of the Penal Code, would be incommensurably severe". The Code fights special recidivism also by providing special measures against special recidivists coming under Art. 69 § 1 and 2: protective supervision (called "supervision" further on) and social readaptation centre (called "centre" further on). The first of them - supervision - is a non isolating measure, consisting in the control of behavior of the supervised person in the conditions of liberty. It is adjudicated for a period of 3 to 5 years (Art. 63 § 1 of the Penal Code). The second measure - centre - is of isolating character. The duration of stay in the centre is not appointed beforehand in the sentence: it is at least 2 years, at most 5 years long. After 2 years, the recidivist may be discharged by the execution of penalty court if there are good reasons to presume that he will not commit any offence after discharge (Art. 65 of the Penal Code). Special measures are executed after the sentence has been served. The principles of application of the special measures differ as regards both categories of recidivists: those coming under Art. 60 § 1 of the Penal Code (called "common recidivists" further on) and those coming under Art. 60 § 2 (called further "multiple recidivists"). The organs authorized to adjudge these measures are the criminal and execution of penalty courts. Their decision as to adjudgement of them may be taken at various stages of legal and executive proceedings: in the sentence (criminal court), in the latter part of imprisonment (execution of penalty court), and during the supervision (execution of penalty court). The principles of application of the special measures by the court which is to pass judgement in the case are stated in Art. 62 of the Penal Code. According to § 1, the application of supervision is optional towards the offenders coming under Art. 60 § 1. The court is here at liberty to decide as to the possible measures, as no premises to adjudge supervision are specified by the regulation. As to the recidivists coming under Art. 60 § 2, the adjudgement of one of the two special measures is obligatory, that of supervision as a rule. The adjudgement of the centre takes place only if the court recognizes supervision insufficient to prevent recidivism (Art. 62 § 2 of the Penal Code). The second instance when decisions are taken as to the application of the special measures is the close of imprisonment of the recidivists. The rulings of the execution of penalty taken at this stage of the proceedings modify those taken previously - that is, in the sentence - as regards the application of the special measures. In the case of common recidivists, these modifications may consist in adjudgement of supervision if it was not adjudicated in the sentence (Art. 91 of the Code of Execution of Penalties), or - if the recidivist is released on probation - in the specific conditional simulation of the supervision adjudicated in the sentence (Art. 98 § 1 of the Penal Code). If the release on probation is not cancelled by the court, the adjudgement of supervision loses effect (Art. 98 § 2 of the Penal Code). In the case of multiple recidivists, the modifications which may take place in the latter part of imprisonment as regards the adjudication of the special measures always consist in substitution of a strict measure by a milder one: the penitentiary court may replace the adjudgement of the centre with supervision (Art. 103 of the Code of Execution of Penalties) or release multiple recidivists on probation. The third closing stage of proceedings when the decisions on application of special measures are taken is the execution of supervision. In this stage, the position of recidivists coming under Art. 60 § 1 and 2 of the Penal Code is identical: they can both be sent to the centre in consequence of failure of the supervision (Art. 64 of the Penal Code). Thus the adjudgement of the centre in consequence of failure of supervision serves here as a measure to discipline the execution of supervision. The present study was based on the data from criminal records of the Criminal Register and the Central Files of Convicted and Temporarily Arrested Persons. The material from these records enables one to notice the differences, as regards the data they include, between the groups of recidivists distinguished in respect of the special measure adjudicated towards them, and thus, to define initially the criteria for application of these measures. As a conclusion, an attempt was made to define the general range of adjudgement of the special measures towards recidivists regardless of the stage of proceedings in which it took place. The research was of cross-sectional character. The examined population consisted of recidivists (coming under Art. 60) from the entire country and selected to 3 random samples: the first sample included all recidivists whose sentences had become valid within the period from March 1 till April 30, 1979 (1181 persons), the second sample included all recidivists discharged from prison within the period from February 1 till March 31, 1979 (874 persons), and the third one - all recidivists whose supervision had been completed within the period from April 1 till May 31, 1979 (544 persons). There were the total of 2599 cases, from which 72 cases had been excluded because of the lack of complete data in the Criminal Register. The final populations of the separate samples were thus as follows: I - 1146 persons, II - 869 persons, III - 512 persons (the total of 2 527 persons). The collected material was then analysed, that is, the groups of persons were compared, distinguished on the grounds of the type of the special measure adjudicated towards them, for instance the group of multiple recidivists towards whom supervision had been adjudicated was compared with the group sent to the centre. The above comparisons were made for each sample separately, and within the sample - separately as regards the common and multiple recidivists. The method of representing the results reflects , the analysis scheme: each sample has been represented in a separate part of the present paper. The study is summed un by an attempt to estimate the general range of adjudgement of the special measures towards recidivists. The results of the estimation indicate that the application of the special measures towards recidivists is of a very broad range. As many an approximately a half of the common recidivists had been subjected to supervision; failure occurred as regards 40 per cent of the supervised persons, which makes about 1/5 of all common recidivists, and these persons came under the regulation providing the adjudgement of the centre in consequence of the failure of supervision. In 40 per cent of the cases the cause of the unsuccessful termination of supervision was the non-compliance with orders and duties by the supervised person, and in 60 per cent - commission of a new offence. As regards multiple recidivists, there were as few as 14 per cent of them towards whom no special measure whatever had been adjudicated, owing to adjudgements of the execution of penalty courts. Approximately 27 per cent of the multiple recidivists had been sent to the centre immediately from prison, while approximately 59 per cent had been subjected to supervision. In over a half of these cases supervision was unsuccessful, which makes about 1/3 of the multiple recidivists. The cause of the unsuccessful termination of supervision was in 2/3 of the cases commission of a new offence, and in 1/3 of the cases non-compliance with orders and duties.
Źródło:: Archiwum Kryminologii; 1982, VIII-IX; 151-190
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:: Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 11.

Tytuł:: Izolacja od społeczeństwa po odbyciu w pełni kary pozbawienia wolności
Being isolated from society after serving one’s criminal sentence
Autorzy:: Dawidziuk, Ewa
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698838.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:: Krajowy Ośrodek Zapobiegania Zachowaniom Dyssocjalnym
pozbawienie wolności
terapia
zagrożenia dla społeczeństwa
zaburzenia psychczne
National Centre for the Prevention of Antisocial Behaviour
deprivation of liberty
therapy
danger to society
mental disorders
Opis:: The article describes the functioning of the National Centre for the Prevention of Antisocial Behaviour in Gostynin on the basis of interviews that the author conducted with patients there during three visits to the Centre as an employee of the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights. It is a detention centre described as a medical facility where therapy is provided for people with mental disorders such as mental retardation, personality disorder, or sexual preferences disorder. The author describes examples of patients’ legal situations and the observance of their constitutional rights. It was organised in 2014 on the basis of legislation from 22 November 2013. That act states that the civil court shall decide whether a person who has served their entire criminal sentence a danger to society because of his/her disorders. The Constitutional Tribunal has stated in its judgements that the act, apart from one article, is consistent with the Polish Constitution. In practice, we can observe many legislative gaps or a need to change a binding law. The number of patients at Gostynin is increasing rapidly whilst the existing problems have not been solved by the legislature, who do not wish to consider the problems pointed out many times by the Commissioner for Human Rights.
Artykuł opisuje funkcjonowanie Krajowego Ośrodka Zapobiegania Zachowaniom Dyssocjalnym w Gostynie na podstawie rozmów, jakie autorka przeprowadziła z pacjentami Ośrodka w czasie trzech jego wizytacji jako pracownik Biura Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich. Ośrodek ten jest miejscem pozbawienia wolności oznaczonym jako podmiot medyczny, w którym prowadzona jest terapia dla osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi w postaci upośledzenia umysłowego, zaburzenia osobowości lub zaburzenia preferencji seksualnych. Ośrodek został stworzony w 2014 r. na podstawie ustawy z 22 listopada 2013 r. Autorka opisuje przykłady dotyczące sytuacji prawnej kilku pacjentów Ośrodka i problemów z respektowaniem ich praw konstytucyjnych. Ustawa przewiduje, że sąd cywilny podejmuje decyzję, czy uznać osobę, która w pełni odbyła karę pozbawienia wolności, za stwarzającą zagrożenie dla społeczeństwa ze względu na zaburzenia i w dalszym ciągu pozbawiać ją wolności poprzez umieszczenie w KOZZD albo zastosować nadzór prewencyjny. Trybunał Konstytucyjny uznał przepisy ustawy, z wyjątkiem jednego, za zgodne z Konstytucją RP. W praktyce ustawa zawiera szereg luk prawnych bądź wymaga nowelizacji w zakresie obowiązujących uregulowań. Liczba pacjentów wzrasta bardzo szybko, a problemy pozostają nierozwiązane przez ustawodawcę, który nie chce się pochylić nad zgłaszanymi wielokrotnie przez Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich zagadnieniami.
Źródło:: Archiwum Kryminologii; 2019, XLI/1; 219-260
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:: Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 12.

Tytuł:: Przestępczość i polityka karna sądów w Węgierskiej Republice Ludowej
Crime and the penal policy of courts in the Hungarian peoples republic
Autorzy:: Kubiak, Jacek R.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699255.pdf
Data publikacji:: 1987
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:: polityka karna
republika ludowa
przestępczość
ustawodawstwo
prawo karne
Węgry
orzecznictwo
gwałt
sądownictwo
pozbawienie wolności
grzywna
ludobójstwo
people's republic
criminality
legislation
criminal law
Hungary
certification
rape
judiciary
deprivation of liberty
fine
genocide
criminal policy
criminal Policy
Opis:: There is in Hungary a many years tradition. of gathering and publishing criminal statistics and its theoretical analysis. This tradition dates back to the early 19th century. In the modern days, it was discontinued in the years 1944-1956 only. However, in 1957, the publication of the basic data of criminal statistics in Statistical Yearbooks published by the central statistical Office was started anew. As shown by an analysis of the trends of the number of convictions of adults in the years 1944-1984 based on official sources, there is a high substantial changes in these trends with changes in the provisions of the penal law and to some extent in the socio-political climate. The following can thus be noticed: A very big number of convictions in the late fourties and early fifties (with the culminating point in 1952), accompanied by rapid drops in the years when amnesty laws were passed or new provisions of the penal law were introduced. A great drop in the number of convictions in 1956 and, 1957 which was related directly first of all to the course of events before and after October 23, 1956, and to the fact that a part of the jurisdiction of common courts of law was taken over by special courts of law was taken over by special courts the activity of which is not reflected in the analysed statistical data. A relative stabilization of the number of convictions in the years of gradual socio-political consolidation ( 1958-1962). A gradual increase in the number of convictions after the entering into force of the Penal Code of 1961 and its amendment of 1971. Accompanied by intermittent drops in the amnesty years and in the years when provisions that modified the Penal Code entered into force. An increase in the number of convictions after the entering into force of the Penal Code of 1978. The rate of convictions per 100,000 of the population in 1984 was 2'5 times higher than in 1952, but not much lower than the 1961 rate. The rise in crime in the recent years is also evident in the available data from the police and public prosecutor's statistics. The number of reported offences went up by one-third in the period 1965-1985 and has a constant upward trend. Among the offences reported most numerous are offences against property (about 60 per cent of all reported offences), traffic offences (about 12-13 per cent), offences against public order (hooliganism and parasitism in particular), and offences against person (about 7-8 per cent). As compared with 1965, the number of burglaries was 3.5 times as big in the eighties, and the number of robberies - 7 . times. The number of traffic offences increased by over one-third as well. Also offences against person reveal a small upward trend, with the number of homicides being stable. However, the number of homicides in Hungary has for many years been considerably larger than the mean European figure (mean homicide rate per 100,000 of the population amounting to 3.8 in the years 1979--1983). The rise in crime concerned financial offences also (offences against the foreign currency exchange regulations, against customs regulations, tax offences) which are included in ,the group of offences against the national economy. The penal policy of the Hungarian courts has rather frequently been subject to spectacular transformations. In the early seventies, stabilization was achieved in this policy which manifested itself by a limited application of unconditional deprivation of liberty and by a broad use of fine and other measures not involving deprivation of liberty. However, the rise in crime in the eighties influenced a more frequent application of unconditional deprivation of liberty, which resulted in the growth of prison population. In 1979, the number of persons deprived of liberty amounted to 16,764 (157 per 100,000 of the population), while in 1984 the respective number was 21,884 (205 per 100.000 of the population). In Hungary, conditional suspension of the execution of the penalty of deprivation- of liberty is not as popular as in other European socialist countries. For every fifth convicted person, the execution of penalty is suspended. In 1973, the courts for the- first time passed a greater number of fines (48.8 per cent) than prison sentences (43.9 per cent). In the-following years, the share of fines in the structure of penalties even exceeded 50 per cent. However, after entering into force of the new Penal code, an unexpected drop in the number of fines took place things to the which was due among other fact that some of the petty offences were removed from the Penal Code , and that a new penal measure without deprivation of liberty, i.e. probation, was introduced. In 1983, the share of fines dropped to 40 per cent of all sentences. The Hungarian courts were most reluctant to apply the penalty of corrective and educational work as soon as the penalty was introduced in 1950. For a dozen-odd years the share of this penalty in all penalties imposed never exceeded 10 per cent. After the 1961 Penal Code was introduced the penalty of corrective and educational work showed an upward trend (up to 15,8 per cent in 1964), but later on started to fall up, to 4 per cent in 1983. In the years 1962 -1983. common courts sentenced 105 persons to death penalty, for qualified homicide in the vast majority of cases. Since 1968, this penalty has been applied exlusively towards the perpetrators of homicide. In 1984, the extent of reported crime in Hungary was similar to that found in Poland (1, 470 per 100,000 o0f the population); however, in Hungary the response to the rise in crime has been in general much more balanced and quiet.
Źródło:: Archiwum Kryminologii; 1987, XIV; 43-95
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:: Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 13.

Tytuł:: Czy ciasna cela to brak humanitaryzmu? – uwagi na gruncie art. 3 Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka
Does a narrow cell mean lack of humanity? – remarks on the basis of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Autorzy:: Piech, Karolina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1730267.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-04-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:: prawa człowieka
zasada humanitaryzmu
osadzony
zakład karny
pozbawienie wolności
system penitencjarny
prawo karne wykonawcze
Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka
human rights
the principle of humanitarianism
prisoner
prison
imprisonment
penitentiary system
executive criminal law
European Convention on Human Rights
Opis:: The article concerns one of the basic principles of executive criminal law and, at the same time, the nominee of the European Convention on Human Rights – the principle of humanitarianism. The subject of research is the issue of overcrowding in Polish prisons and the problem of cramped cells, in which prisoners are held. The aim of the article is to evaluate this phenomenon, to indicate its causes and to propose solutions of the problem. The findings made in this article have practical significance, because overcrowding in prisons is a problem that has a significant impact on the functioning of prisoners and the process of their resocialisation.
Artykuł dotyczy jednej z podstawowych zasad prawa karnego wykonawczego i jednocześnie norm zawartych w Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka – zasady humanitaryzmu. Przedmiotem badań jest zagadnienie przeludnienia w polskich zakładach karnych oraz problem ciasnych cel, w jakich przebywają osadzeni. Celem artykułu jest ocena omawianego zjawiska, wskazanie jego przyczyn oraz próba przedstawienia propozycji rozwiązań problemu. Poczynione w niniejszym artykule ustalenia mają duże znaczenie praktyczne, ponieważ przeludnienie w zakładach karnych stanowi problem, który ma znaczny wpływ na funkcjonowanie skazanych oraz proces ich resocjalizacji.
Źródło:: Przegląd Europejski; 2021, 1; 179-190
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:: Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 14.

Tytuł:: Prawo do wolności i bezpieczeństwa osobistego w Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka
The right to liberty and security in the European Convention on Human Rights
Autorzy:: Gołębiowska, Anna
Woźnica, Justyna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/136665.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
Tematy:: wolność
bezpieczeństwo
bezpieczeństwo osobiste
prawa człowieka
prawo do wolności
prawo do bezpieczeństwa osobistego
pozbawienie wolności
ochrona praw człowieka
freedom
security
personal safety
human rights
right to freedom
right to personal security
deprivation of liberty
protection of human rights
Opis:: W artykule dokonano analizy jednego z najważniejszych praw jednostki ludzkiej, jakim jest prawo do wolności i bezpieczeństwa osobistego. W związku z tym zbadano genezę i prawno-międzynarodowe standardy regulacji tego prawa.
The article analyses one of the most important human rights – the personal freedom and security. In connection with this, the origin of the rights as well as legal-international standards of its regulations are also analysed.
Źródło:: Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP / Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej; 2019, 1, 69; 125-140
0239-5223
Pojawia się w:: Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP / Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki