Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "avant‑garde art" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Moskiewski konceptualizm - między awangardą a postmodernizmem
Autorzy:
Pietraś, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/444279.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Tematy:
conceptualism
underground
soc art
avant-garde
postmodernism
Opis:
The Moscov Conceptualism was one of the famous phenomena of non-official art. It showed emptiness of soviet paintings, literature, art. The Moscow underground was connected by the same feeling and need to change the soviet language poisoned by demagogy of politicians, by the falsity of official slogans and literature. It entered two influential styles in non-formal culture of the 1970s and 1980s. First of them was concentrated on a visual art and used term "soc-art" connected with series of paintings by Vitaly Komar and Alexander Malamid. It compared material forms of soviet ideology (posters, slogans, graphic art) with the profusion of Western commercial advertising products and pop art. The second circle of artists was concentrated near Ilya Kabakov and included not only painters but also great writers like Dmitry Prigov, Lev Rubinstein and Vladimir Sorokin, who used to deconstruct typical socrealistic literature by showing her absurd. This trend was called Moscow Conceptualism and was in many points connected with traditions of avant-garde art, especially futurism and OBERIU.
Źródło:
Acta Neophilologica; 2007, IX; 131-142
1509-1619
Pojawia się w:
Acta Neophilologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
NOWOCZESNOŚĆ W REFLEKSJI NAD SZTUKĄ
Modernity in reflection on art
Autorzy:
Dziamski, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/487834.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12-05
Wydawca:
Akademia Sztuk Pięknych im. Eugeniusza Gepperta we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
Avant -garde
neo -avant -garde
modernism
postmodernism
language code
literary (artistic ) code
brand code
artistic sociolect
artistic idiolect
Opis:
The twentieth century has developed three models for describing contemporary art. Three narratives dominated in the 1930’s and the 1940’s: Paris-French, German-Expressionist and avant-garde-international. In the 1950’s and the 1960’s, avant-garde-centrist model included two basic phases or formations in the art of the twentieth century. Historical avantgarde period covered the years 1905–1930. Neo-avant-garde lasted from 1955 to 1970. To a pair of avant-garde – neo-avant-garde, some authors add yet proto-avant-garde they considered as the nineteenth century artistic trends leading to the birth of the historical avant-garde - romanticism, realism of Courbet, impressionism, post-impressionism and on the other hand post-avant-garde, or art after the fall of the avant-garde. In the 1980’s and the 1990’s, avant-garde model was superseded by a model operating the opposition modernism - postmodernism. According to that model, the twentieth century art include two cultural and artistic formations: modernist and postmodernist formations. The first experienced its climax around 1910, when abstract art was born; the second in the 1980’s. Modernism and postmodernism can be considered as two codes that define literary (artistic) codes, but there is a significant difference between them. The modernist code reveals modernist essentialist attitude, the trend of looking for essence, individuality, specificity of art, trying to melt pure art, while postmodernist code refers to the avant-garde and the expanded field of art, focusing on the relationship of art and life.
Źródło:
DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu; 2016, 22; 6-18
1733-1528
Pojawia się w:
DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rok 1989 – wokół pojęcia modernizmu
Autorzy:
Włodarczyk, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909503.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
history of Polish art
vocabulary
modernism
postmodernism
avant-garde
Opis:
The author argues that the significance of the year 1989 for Polish art was not determined by political changes, but by the rise of postmodernism. Until that moment, the term “modernism” usually referred in academic art history to Polish art at the turn of the 20th century. The concept of postmodernism brought to the Polish language a new meaning of modernism as simply modern art, and more precisely, as modern art defined by Clement Greenberg. That change made it necessary to draw a new map of concepts referring to modern Polish art, most often defined before by the concept of the avant-garde. In Mieczysław Porębski’s essay “Two Programs” [Dwa programy] (1949), and then, since the late 1960s, in Andrzej Turowski’s publications, the concept of the avant-garde was acknowledged as basic for understanding twentieth-century Polish art. The significance of the concept of the avant-garde in reference to the art of the past century in Poland changed after the publication of Piotr Piotrowski’s book of 1999, Meanings of Modernism [Znaczenia modernizmu]. Piotrowski challenged in it the key role of that concept – e.g., Władysław Strzemiński and Henryk Stażewski, usually called avant-gardists before, were considered by him modernists – in favor of a new term, “critical art,” referring to the developments in the 1990. In fact, critical art continued the political heritage of the avant-garde as the radical art of resistance. The author believes that such a set of terms and their meanings imposes on the concept of the avant-garde some limits, as well as suggests that scholars and critics use them rather inconsistently. He argues that concepts should not be treated as just label terms, but they must refer to deeper significance of tendencies in art. He mentions Elżbieta Grabska’s term “realism,” also present in the tradition of studies on modern Polish art, and concludes with a postulate of urgent revision of the relevant vocabulary of Polish art history.
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 415-428
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
1989. On the Concept of Modernism
Autorzy:
Włodarczyk, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909512.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-20
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
history of Polish art
vocabulary
modernism
postmodernism
avant-garde
Opis:
The author argues that the significance of the year 1989 for Polish art was not determined by political changes, but by the rise of postmodernism. Until that moment, the term “modernism” usually referred in academic art history to Polish art at the turn of the 20th century. The concept of postmodernism brought to the Polish language a new meaning of modernism as simply modern art, and more precisely, as modern art defined by Clement Greenberg. That change made it necessary to draw a new map of concepts referring to modern Polish art, most often defined before by the concept of the avant-garde. In Mieczysław Porębski’s essay “Two Programs” [Dwa programy] (1949), and then, since the late 1960s, in Andrzej Turowski’s publications, the concept of the avant-garde was acknowledged as basic for understanding twentieth-century Polish art. The significance of the concept of the avant-garde in reference to the art of the past century in Poland changed after the publication of Piotr Piotrowski’s book of 1999, Meanings of Modernism [Znaczenia modernizmu]. Piotrowski challenged in it the key role of that concept – e.g., Władysław Strzemiński and Henryk Stażewski, usually called avant-gardists before, were considered by him modernists – in favor of a new term, “critical art,” referring to the developments in the 1990. In fact, critical art continued the political heritage of the avant-garde as the radical art of resistance. The author believes that such a set of terms and their meanings imposes on the concept of the avant-garde some limits, as well as suggests that scholars and critics use them rather inconsistently. He argues that concepts should not be treated as just label terms, but they must refer to deeper significance of tendencies in art. He mentions Elżbieta Grabska’s term “realism,” also present in the tradition of studies on modern Polish art, and concludes with a postulate of urgent revision of the relevant vocabulary of Polish art history.
Źródło:
Artium Quaestiones; 2019, 30; 257-270
0239-202X
Pojawia się w:
Artium Quaestiones
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Can we talk about contemporary avant-garde outside Western cultures? The case of contemporary art in the Republic of South Africa
Autorzy:
Łukaszewicz Alcaraz, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/593919.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
avant-garde formation
avant-garde attitude
postmodernism
post colonialism
South African art
critical engagement
formacja awangardowa
postawa awangardowa
postmodernizm
postkolonializm
sztuka Południowej Afryki
krytyczne zaangażowanie
Opis:
The appreciation of the importance of the avant-garde, and of its re-thinking of the socio- -cultural reality, ensues from its fundamental role for 20th and 21st century art practice and theory. However, in the contemporary global world, asking about the persistence of the avant-garde, we should take into consideration the different social/historical/cultural conditions of the specific geographical regions. In the following article, I focus on postcolonial art in the Republic of South Africa, relating to postmodernism, demonstrating a critical, emancipatory approach and an artistic responsibility for the partial view of the world which the artist co-construes. I try to answer the question of whether we can talk about avant-garde ideas and approaches in South African art, though they have a different background and are not rooted in the tradition of western avant-garde.
Doniosłość rozważań poświęconych awangardzie i jej przemyślenie w zmieniających się warunkach społeczno-kulturowych wynikają z fundamentalnej roli tego ruchu dla praktyki artystycznej i teorii sztuki w wieku XX i XXI. Jednakże we współczesnym globalnym świecie, pytając o trwałość awangardy powinniśmy zastanowić się nad różnymi społeczno-historyczno-kulturowymi uwarunkowaniami w poszczególnych miejscach geograficznych, które bierzemy pod uwagę. W artykule koncentruję się na sztuce Republiki Południowej Afryki, która jest postkolonialna, powiązana z postmodernizmem, która ukazuje podejście krytyczne i emancypacyjne oraz odpowiedzialność artysty/ artystki za częściowy obraz świata, który on/ona współ-konstruuje. Zatem, staram się odpowiedzieć na pytanie, czy możemy mówić o ideách i postawie awangardowej w sztuce Południowej Afryki, choć wyrastają one na innym podłożu i nie mają korzeni w formacji zachodniej awangardy.
Źródło:
Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts; 2017, 19; 171-185
1641-9278
Pojawia się w:
Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Błąd kulturowy? Próba analizy niektórych tendencji współczesnej kultury
Cultural error? The attempt to analyze some tendencies in contemporary culture
Autorzy:
Michalak, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/502053.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
błąd antropologiczny
błąd kulturowy
ateizm
emancypacja rozumu i wolności
postmodernizm
duch dionizyjski i apolliński
artystyczna awangarda
klasyczna aksjologia
asztuka
antysztuka
anthropological error
cultural error
atheism
emancipation of reason and freedom
postmodernism
Dionysian and Apollonian spirit
artistic avant-garde
classical axiology
a-art
anti-art
Opis:
The idea of a “cultural error”, which is included in the title, refers to the category of an “anthropological error”, which was formulated by John Paul II in his encyclical Centesimus annus. According to the Polish pope this error was the foundation of a faulty assessment of society and human role which was suggested by the Marxist philosophical and social system. The idea of a “cultural error”, which has been put forward in this article, is an attempt to formulate a holistic view of the cultural transformation process which started in the 18th century in the Enlightenment era and which has lasted up till now. This error consists in the negation of the possibility of the natural origin of the axiological sphere and in promoting the opposite worldview that all values (ethical, esthetic, epistemological), which put order into human thinking and acting, are the merely the result of the culture. This article is the attempt to present the panorama of those transformations, which result from this erroneous assessment of man (negating the vision of a human person as a being who is open to the transcendence) and his role in culture creation process.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2015, 24, 1; 63-75
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies