Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Daniel, C." wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
On Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian Method in The Acting Person: Induction and Reduction as Aristotelian Induction (ἐπαγωγή) and Division (διαίρεσις) (Part I)
Autorzy:
Wagner, Daniel C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1622363.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-07-23
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Karol Wojtyła
method
induction
reduction
Aristotle
definition
division
person
act
philosophical anthropology
Opis:
This is the first of a two-part study treating Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian methodology. The study shows that Wojtyła’s inductive and reductive methodology is identical with the Aristotelian method of proceeding from what is better-known to us in experience (ἐμπειρία/empeiria) to what is better-known to nature by way of induction (ἐπαγωγή/epagoge) and analysis (ἀνάλῠσις/analusis) or division (διαίρεσις/diairesis). By a rigorous presentation of this Aristotelian methodology here in Part I, the logical form and force of Wojtyła’s method is properly disclosed and appreciated in Part II. Wojtyła’s method utilizes the logical forms of reductio ad impossibile and reasoning on the hypothesis of the end, or effect-cause reasoning, which is special to the life sciences and the power-object model of definition. By this methodology, Wojtyła obtains definitive knowledge of the human person that is necessary and undeniable: he discloses the εἶδος (eidos) or species of the person in the Aristotelian, Thomistic, and Phenomenological sense of the term.
Źródło:
Philosophy and Canon Law; 2021, 7, 1; 1-42
2450-4955
2451-2141
Pojawia się w:
Philosophy and Canon Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian Method Part II Induction and Reduction as Aristotelian Induction (ἐπαγωγή) and Division (διαίρεσις)
Autorzy:
Wagner, Daniel C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2016005.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Karol Wojtyła
method
induction
reduction
Aristotle
definition
division
person
act
philosophical anthropology
Opis:
This is the second of a two-part study treating Karol Wojtyła’s Aristotelian methodology. Having presented Aristotle’s method of induction (ἐπαγωγή/epagoge) and analysis (ἀνάλῠσις/analusis) or division (διαίρεσις/diairesis) in Part I, Part II discloses the logical form and force of Wojtyła’s method of induction and reduction as Aristotelian induction and division. Looking primarily to the introduction to The Acting Person, it is shown that Wojtyła utilizes the logical forms of reductio ad impossibile and reasoning on the hypothesis of the end, or effect-cause reasoning, which is special to the life sciences and the power-object model of definition as set down by Aristotle. By use of this Aristotelian methodology, Wojtyła obtains definitive knowledge of the human person that is necessary and undeniable: he discloses the εἶδος (eidos) or species of the person in the Aristotelian, Thomistic, and Phenomenological sense of the term.
Źródło:
Philosophy and Canon Law; 2021, 7, 2; 1-27
2450-4955
2451-2141
Pojawia się w:
Philosophy and Canon Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Disputatio on the Distinction between the Human Person and Other Animals: the Human Person as Gardener
Autorzy:
Savino, Damien Marie
Wagner, Daniel C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138115.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-26
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
human uniqueness
gardening
person
personalism
philosophical anthropology
philosophical biology
thomas Aquinas
Aristotle
human intelligence
animal intelligence
cognition
epistemology
metaphysics
philosophy of language
evolutionary biology
ecology
logic
ethics
disputatio
Opis:
While the catholic intellectual tradition upholds the uniqueness of humans, much contemporary scientific research has come to the opposing conclusion that humans are not significantly different from other animals. to engage in robust dialogue around the question of human uniqueness, we utilize Aquinas’s model of disputatio to focus on an attribute of human beings that is unexplored in the literature – namely, the human capacity to garden – and address five scientific and philosophical objections to our position that the capacity to garden makes humans distinct. engaging with various branches of science, we demonstrate that human capacities and modes of gardening are not only incrementally different, but also fundamentally different in kind, from those of nonhuman creatures. Philosophically, we utilize the power-object model of division and Aristotle’s categorization of knowledge to express the difference in kind between human beings and other animals. these responses allow us to set aside each major objection.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2022, 11, 3; 471-530
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies