Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Historical Methodology" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    On the Fieldwork in Oral History Research
    Autorzy:
    Kurkowska-Budzan, Marta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943403.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Ośrodek Pamięć i Przyszłość
    Tematy:
    oral history
    metodologia oral history
    pamięć
    dziennik badań
    badania historyczne
    oral history methodology
    remembrance
    research diary
    historical research
    Opis:
    The article concerns the problem of a lack of both academic tools as well as a catalogue of basic epistemological objectives that could serve oral history in Poland. It has to be stated, however, that there are already many institutions, conferences and journals, that focus on the issue of oral history. The author proposes some solutions that could improve this methodological gap, based on her own experience in oral history, such as introducing a research diary as a scientific research tool. 
    Źródło:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej; 2016, 6; 7-19
    2719-7522
    2084-0578
    Pojawia się w:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Oral history and historical education in Poland. Possibilities and application
    Autorzy:
    Kierzkowski, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943400.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Ośrodek Pamięć i Przyszłość
    Tematy:
    oral history
    edukacja historyczna
    historia
    Polska
    dyskurs historyczny
    świadek historii
    metodologia historii
    polska edukacja
    muzea
    historical education
    history
    Polska
    historical discourse
    witness to history
    history methodology
    Polish education
    museums
    Opis:
    The article deals with an issue of the possible applications of oral history to teaching history at Polish schools. The author states that oral history as an element of educating young people should become a natural part of teaching processes. It can become a factor increasing their awareness of their local history and of the links connecting them with the previous generations. It is also an efficient way of avoiding teaching based only on archival facts and events. This statement is illustrated by chosen examples of the use of oral history at schools and discusses the possibilities of its further use.
    Źródło:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej; 2016, 6; 81-100
    2719-7522
    2084-0578
    Pojawia się w:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    It is good to ask good questions – posing questions in oral history interview as a theoretical problem
    Autorzy:
    Jarząbek, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/943392.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Ośrodek Pamięć i Przyszłość
    Tematy:
    oral history
    metodologia oral history
    źródło historyczne
    wywiad
    teoria oral history
    pytania w historii ustnej
    oral history methodology
    historical source
    interview
    oral history theory
    questions in oral history
    Opis:
    The author discusses an issue of forming questions in oral history. There are two types of them – research questions and interview questions. Instead of analyzing how to ask questions, the interviewer should rather focus on why to ask them. The article proves that asking questions in oral history is less about formal elements such as what language should be used or what matters should be raised, but more about such elements as emotions or the overall atmosphere of an interview. The author gives some clues on how to prepare proper questions, what difficulties may appear and what to avoid in order to carry out a good interview.
    Źródło:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej; 2016, 6; 21-32
    2719-7522
    2084-0578
    Pojawia się w:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Świadek historii. Swobodne wspominanie a krytyka źródła historycznego – o ambiwalencji metody w zachodnioniemieckiej oral history około roku 1980
    Contemporary witness. Free recall versus historical source criticism – on the ambiguity of the method of West German oral history around 1980
    Autorzy:
    Maubach, Franka
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/634729.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Ośrodek Pamięć i Przyszłość
    Tematy:
    oral history
    naoczny świadek
    niemiecka historia mówiona
    wywiad jako źródło historyczne
    społeczeństwo post-dyktatorskie
    pamięć
    metodologia
    contemporary witness
    german oral history
    interview as a historical source
    post-dictatorial society
    memory
    methodology
    Opis:
    Only recently has the contemporary witness become the subject of academic study. The emerging scholarship views this figure as belonging to a specific historical period, namely the post-Holocaust era. Today, the narrations of the contemporary witness are commonly understood as constructs, as stories developed synchronously in the course of the interview. The article takes a closer look at the formative period of the German Oral History studies around 1980, a field deeply informed by post-dictatorial sensibilities. It locates the figure of the contemporary witness, the interviewer and the interview methods employed within the historical context in which they emerged. Moreover, if we consider other Oral History approaches developed elsewhere and compare the German approach to Fritz Schütze’s narrative interview method for the social sciences, it can be identified as a genuinely historical, diachronically operating approach.  By letting the interviewees talk about their memories uninterrupted, they were encouraged to reflect on their lives as a whole. A the same time, pioneers of the field such as Lutz Niethammer and Alexander von Plato developed ways to verify the narrations’ plausibility and thus to evaluate the reliability of the interview as istorical source. This combination of empathy and skepticism, of unconditional interest in a person’s full life-story and its critical verification became the hallmark of German Oral history Studies, not least because emerged in a post-dictatorial society. Rather than studying memories as mere constructions of the past, they developed a methodology aimed at enabling historians to get access to the actual past experiences which they believed are contained in the retrospective testimonies of individual human beings.
    Only recently has the contemporary witness become the subject of academic study. The emerging scholarship views this figure as belonging to a specific historical period, namely the post-Holocaust era. Today, the narrations of the contemporary witness are commonly understood as constructs, as stories developed synchronously in the course of the interview. The article takes a closer look at the formative period of the German Oral History studies around 1980, a field deeply informed by post-dictatorial sensibilities. It locates the figure of the contemporary witness, the interviewer and the interview methods employed within the historical context in which they emerged. Moreover, if we consider other Oral History approaches developed elsewhere and compare the German approach to Fritz Schütze’s narrative interview method for the social sciences, it can be identified as a genuinely historical, diachronically operating approach. By letting the interviewees talk about their memories uninterrupted, they were encouraged to reflect on their lives as a whole. A the same time, pioneers of the field such as Lutz Niethammer and Alexander von Plato developed ways to verify the narrations’ plausibility and thus to evaluate the reliability of the interview as istorical source. This combination of empathy and skepticism, of unconditional interest in a person’s full life-story and its critical verification became the hallmark of German Oral history Studies, not least because emerged in a post-dictatorial society. Rather than studying memories as mere constructions of the past, they developed a methodology aimed at enabling historians to get access to the actual past experiences which they believed are contained in the retrospective testimonies of individual human beings.
    Źródło:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej; 2013, 3; 39-72
    2719-7522
    2084-0578
    Pojawia się w:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies