- Tytuł:
-
Panenteizm a teizm klasyczny. Uwagi na kanwie Jacka Wojtysiaka krytyki stanowiska Józefa Życińskiego
Panentheism and classical theism. Comments on the basis of Jacek Wojtysiak's criticism of Józef Życiński's position - Autorzy:
- Gutowski, Piotr
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2074658.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2022
- Wydawca:
- Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
- Tematy:
-
Józef Życiński
Jacek Wojtysiak
thesim
panentheism
classical theism
God’s impassibility
omnipotence
omniscience
creatio ex nihil
teizm
panenteizm
teizm klasyczny
boska niecierpiętliwość
wszechmoc
wszechwiedza
stworzenie świata ex nihilo - Opis:
- The article was inspired by the tenth anniversary of the death of Archbishop Życiński and the article containing polemic with his panentheism published by Wojtysiak. Wojtysiak claims that the essence of theism is the thesis about the existential self sufficiency of God and the resulting asymmetry of his causal relationship with the world, which consists in the fact that God can exert causal influence on the world, but the world cannot influence God in this way. Since Życiński contradicts this thesis, according to Wojtysiak, his panentheism is not theism at all. I do not agree with this judgment, and what Wojtysiak calls ‘theism’ I call ‘classical theism’. Both panentheism and classical theism constitute legitimate versions of theism. Ishow that the classical theism in the version proposed by Wojtysiak is entangled in serious difficulties. One of them is that on cosmological level it harmonizes best with occasionalism, that is, with full theological determinism. Another one is connected with the thesis t that God is impassible, which deprives him of the possibility of ful filling these pro-religious functions, which are crucial for Christianity, such as God’s experiential involvement in the history of the world. I propose that the recogni tion of divine passibility be the minimum condition for any panentheism or position similar to it. Meeting this condition does not require the rejection of the thesis about the classically understood divine immutability, omnipotence or the creation of the world ex nihilo, but it is conducive to the revision of these notions. I point out that revisions proposed by Życiński in his version of panentheism were incomparably smaller than those proposed by Whitehead or especially Hartshorne, but still they cannot be treated as a minor supplement to classical theism. They constitute ver sion of panentheism or neoclassical theism, which is a much better philosophical basis for Christianity.
- Źródło:
-
Analiza i Egzystencja; 2022, 57; 49-69
1734-9923
2300-7621 - Pojawia się w:
- Analiza i Egzystencja
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł