Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "normy prawa" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Wykorzystanie metod badawczych socjologii prawa przy rozważaniach nad istotą odpowiedzialności dyscyplinarnej
    Autorzy:
    Jóźwiak, Piotr
    Herbowski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2204960.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    sociology of law
    disciplinary responsibility
    disciplinary law
    legal norms
    moral standards
    professional ethics
    socjologia prawa
    odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna
    prawo dyscyplinarne
    normy prawne
    normy moralne
    etyka zawodowa
    Opis:
    In this article selected relationships occurring between the sociology of law and disciplinary law were analyzed. They show the convergence and complementarity of interests of both of these areas of law. Research methods developed in the field of sociology of law can be an excellent tool for research on legal nature of disciplinary responsibility and the problems that arise in this area open up new opportunities for the interests of the sociology of law.
    Źródło:
    Themis Polska Nova; 2016, 2(11); 114-133
    2084-4522
    Pojawia się w:
    Themis Polska Nova
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Między polityką a prawem, czyli o sprawiedliwości okresu przejściowego
    Between politics and law or the question of transitional justice
    Autorzy:
    Czarnota, Adam
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/666074.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    sprawiedliwość transformacyjna
    pamięć zbiorowa
    normy moralne
    legalizm
    podstawy prawa
    transitional justice
    collective memory
    moral norms
    legalism
    foundations of law
    Opis:
    The article is a theoretical study of legal strategies introduced in states under political transformation (post-communist states in Europe, Australia, South Africa) to deal with the effects of former political regimes. As the author argues, opening a discussion concerning the evils of former regimes is important for raising public engagement in building a new state of law. Legal retribution expresses the public contempt for committed crimes and reasserts the existence of public norms. However, following the arguments of Judith Shklar and Niklas Luhmann, the author warns against the inner limitations of legal instruments in defining the space of social and moral relationships. An antidote against the possible political instrumentalization of law and the dominance of legal regulations in public sphere should be found therefore in independent historical research and cultural debate that seeks for a deeper understanding of the past.
    Artykuł jest teoretyczną analizą strategii prawnych wprowadzonych w krajach przechodzących transformację polityczną (w państwach postkomunistycznych w Europie, w Australii, w Południowej Afryce), używanych przy radzeniu sobie ze skutkami dawnych reżimów politycznych. Zdaniem autora rozpoczęcie dyskusji na temat zła dawnych reżimów jest ważne dla zwiększenia zaangażowania społeczeństwa w budowaniu nowego ładu prawnego. Prawna «odpłata» jest wyrazem publicznego potępienia popełnionych zbrodni i potwierdza istnienie norm publicznych. Jednak idąc tropem argumentów Judith Shklar i Niklasa Luhmanna, autor ostrzega przed wewnętrznymi ograniczeniami instrumentów prawnych w definiowaniu przestrzeni stosunków społecznych i relacji o charakterze moralnym. Antidotum na ewentualną instrumentalizację prawa dla celów politycznych i dominację regulacji prawnych w sferze publicznej należy w związku z tym szukać w niezależnych badaniach historycznych i debacie kulturowej, która zmierza do głębszego zrozumienia przeszłości.
    Źródło:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica; 2015, 27; 13-35
    0208-6107
    2353-9631
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica – Aesthetica – Practica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Nowy wymiar zniewolenia czyli o syndromach globalizacji
    A new dimension of enslavement, or on syndromes of globalization
    Autorzy:
    Zbyrad, Teresa
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1852549.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    osoba ludzka
    godność
    normy moralne
    prawa człowieka
    wartości uniwersalne
    wartość pracy ludzkiej
    bezrobocie
    globalization
    national culture
    consumerism
    enslavement of man
    Opis:
    The term globalization is most often used in the world economy. With some people it arouses enthusiasm, and hence a lot of them have become its followers, and with others it inspires fear, uncertainty, the feeling of threat. It is doubtless that the process of globalization has its advantages and drawbacks; it brings liberation to some and enslavement to others. The growing correlations between particular countries in the economic, political and social fields are especially dangerous. The growing economic relations to an ever greater degree limit the sovereignty of particular countries. Cultural homogenization leads to decline of national culture, and standardization of the world creates a serious threat for behavior models and lifestyles. The globalization process is not indifferent to man; it is a new form of enslavement. Syndromes of globalization include, among others, civilization, cultural, and economic unification, more and more acute social inequality, unemployment, increase in mega-corporations, and consumerism. The aim of the article is to attempt giving an answer to the question: Does the globalization process enslave man, and if so, then to what degree?  
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2006, 34, 1; 55-80
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Godność osoby ludzkiej i obiektywne normy moralne jako reguły w działalności gospodarczej
    Dignity of the human person and objective moral norms as rules in economy
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1852622.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    osoba ludzka
    godność
    normy moralne
    prawa człowieka
    wartości uniwersalne
    wartość pracy ludzkiej
    bezrobocie
    human person
    dignity
    moral norms
    human rights
    universal values
    value of human work
    unemployment
    Opis:
    The author subjects to revision the economic liberalism supporters’ views, according to which there is no room for universal moral norms in the area of economy. The conception of homo economicus accepted in economy and the exclusive rule of profit are a manifestation of reductionism. The conviction that the free competition – free market – acts mechanically and impersonally and solves all economic-social problems in the best way is basically incorrect. In free competition there are positive and negative elements. Free competition – “yes, but what kind?” In the article a possibly complete picture of man is shown. Man is a reasonable creature, he is internally free and able to recognize good and evil (owing to his conscience) and owing to this he is the most perfect being in the created world. In his nature, man is a social being (ens sociale); a spiritual-bodily unity; he is not completely actualized but he is open to development; he is a religious and working creature (laborem exercens, homo economicus); he is able to do good, devote oneself to others, to build just – albeit not ideal –systems: legal, cultural, social and economic. But man is also able to do evil: to kill others, to steal, to lie, to wage wars, to commit acts of terrorism and of genocide, to build concentration camps, to manipulate the needs and mentality of whole societies and to enslave others by means of mass media – that is to form a one-dimension man. In the theological-biblical language this is called sinfulness of the human nature. And finally, man is capable of – as H. Marcuse writes – “scientific idiotism”. The highest value is the inborn, n a t u r a l, dignity of the human person, which is pointed to by his mind, inner freedom and conscience. Man is created in God’s image (imago Dei). Christ’s incarnation and redemption of man show his s u p e r n a t u r a l dignity. This is theological-biblical justification. Also philosophical (rational) justification is given. The former one is binding for believers, and the latter is for unbelievers. In the Catholic social teaching both justifications are given. The ontic structure of the human person in itself gives rise to obligations, it is the highest norm. It is defined in the following form: the human person should be respected for himself, because he is a person, and not for any other reason (persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam). The very human person, his dignity, is the fundamental norm of morality that is searched for. The Decalogue, objective and universal moral norms as principles show how to respect and protect the human person. It is not recognizing and complying with moral norms and human rights for themselves that is meant here – art for the art’s sake (pure formalism) – but protection of one’s own dignity and the dignity of every other person. Both moral norms as principles and human rights have been discovered slowly, step by step, but regressions also occur; this especially happened in the 20th and at the beginning of the 21st century. Human persons are the subjects of all communities – the family, the nation, the universal human society (familiae humanae), production and service institutions. The communities do not exist by themselves, but human persons are their foundation. Human persons, and not various systems, are the subject of any activity, for the systems are not persons or super-persons – Super Ego. Hence the thesis put forward by some economists that the system is ruled by an invisible hand is absurd. In human rights three elements are distinguished: their source, contents and protection. These constitute an integral whole. However, identifying a part with the whole (pars pro toto) is a logical mistake. The debate about man’s right to work can be solved after removing this logical mistake and introducing a new term: “the right for work”; showing that work is one of man’s fundamental needs, that it is a universal phenomenon, has a multi-aspectual dimension of values. Work is an anthropological (personal), moral, social, cultural, historical and economic value. Together with the multidimensional value of work the multidimensional evil of unemployment can be seen. There have been various economic models, even in capitalism. After the fall of socialism the thesis is proclaimed that capitalism is the only alternative (logical quantifier). Recognizing the priority of the real capital over work treated as a tool and commodity bought in the so-called work market is the essential feature of capitalism. John Paul II perceives numerous positive elements in capitalism, but he also sees a few negative ones: “We have found out that the thesis saying that after the defeat of real socialism capitalism remains the only model (logical quantifier) of economic organization is unacceptable.” He does not suggest another model, but generally he states that it is “… a society in which there are: freedom of work, enterprise and participation” that is meant here. He adds: “Economy that does not take into consideration the ethical dimension and does not attempt to serve the good of man – each man and the whole man – in fact does not even deserve the name of «economy» understood as reasonable and benevolent management of material resources”. Although he sees positive elements in the process of globalization, he puts forward an imperative demand to base it on the principle of the dignity of the human person and his rights, and the good of the whole human family (familiae humanae). In the area of economy “ … in the field of economy nobody may insult the human dignity without a punishment, which dignity God himself respects greatly” (Leo XIII).
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2006, 34, 1; 19-53
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies