Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Krąpiec" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13
Tytuł:
THE GOOD AS THE MOTIVE OF HUMAN ACTION ACCORDING TO MIECZYSŁAW ALBERT KRĄPIEC
Autorzy:
Kunat, Natalia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507302.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
metaphysics
good
action
motive
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Opis:
In this article the authoress has presented the understanding of the good as the motive for human action on the basis of the position of M. A. Krąpiec. At the beginning, the authoress has concentrated on an analysis of the fact of action, which includes three major factors: the end, the exemplar, and the efficient cause. The good-end here performs the most essential function. The good-end is the motive due to which action has come into existence rather than not. That “which throws” man “out of passivity” to action is described as the motive that appears as the good. In the next part of the article, the good is presented as a fundamental transcendental property of being. The connection of being with the good shows that the world that surrounds us is a world of goods, that is, of beings ordered to the will of a maker or of the Creator. The transcendental good thus understood constitutes the foundation for all action. In the final part of the article, an analysis is made of the functions that are shown by the good that constitutes the motive for action. The first of these functions is the cognitive apprehension of the good understood in the context of the end—the motive of action. At the end, the domains of goods are listed, in which the ontic good, which is a transcendental property of being, plays the most important role.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 155-166
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Lublin Philosophical School: Founders, Motives, Characteristics
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
McDonald, Hugh
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507314.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin Philosophical School
metaphysics
realism
philosophy
Krąpiec
Kalinowski
Swieżawski
Wojtyła
Opis:
The article is focused on the Lublin Philosophical School; it explains its name, presents its founders, reveals the causes of its rise, and introduce the specific character of the School’s philosophy. It starts with stating the fact that in the proper sense, the term “Lublin Philosophical School” describes a way of cultivating realistic (classical) philosophy developed in the 1950s by a group of philosophers at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland. The Lublin Philosophical School is characterized by cognitive realism (the object of cognition is really existing being), maximalism (taking up all existentially important questions), methodological autonomy (in relation to the natural-mathematical sciences and theology), transcendentalism in its assertions (its assertions refer to all reality), methodological-epistemological unity (the same method applied in objectively cultivated philosophical disciplines), coherence (which guarantees the objective unity of the object), and objectivity (achieved by the verifiability of assertions on their own terms, which is achieved by relating them in each instance to objective evidence). The term is the name of the Polish school of realistic (classical) philosophy that arose as a response to the Marxism that was imposed administratively on Polish institutions of learning, and also as a response to other philosophical currents dominant at the time such as phenomenology, existentialism, and logical positivism.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 405-422
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gilson, Krapiec and Christian Philosophy Today
Autorzy:
Tarasiewicz, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507358.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Christian philosophy
Gilson
Krapiec
metaphysics
university
Church
faith
theology
evangelization
Opis:
The author undertakes an attempt to answer the following question: is Christian philosophy possible today? The question seems to be of great importance due to the fact that what Christians who try to do philosophy usually encounter is bitter criticism which comes to them from two sides at once: that of academy and that of the Church. In short, for academy their philosophy is too Christian, and for the Church it is too academic. Being indebted to the insights of Étienne Gilson and Mieczyslaw A. Krapiec (the original Polish spelling: Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec, pronounced: myechisuaf albert krompyetz), the author comes to the conclusion that Christian philosophy is possible today only if: 1) it is not identified with the art of persuasion, as its final end lies in gaining understanding rather than being convincing, 2) it is the work of a Christian, and 3) it has the real world as its object and metaphysics as its method. For Christian philosophy—which in essence consists in doing philosophy by Christians in order to get more rational understanding of their religious faith—should be identified with the perfection of the intellect achieved by practicing the classical philosophy of being.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 281-392
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Lublin Philosophical School: Achievements, Identity and Prospects
Autorzy:
Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
McDonald, Hugh
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507540.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin Philosophical School
metaphysics
realism
philosophy
Krąpiec
Kalinowski
Swieżawski
Wojtyła
Opis:
The article is concentrated on the Lublin Philosophical School which came into being in the institutional framework of the Department of Philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; it describes its achievements, which took place at different stages of the School’s development, as well as the School’s new initiatives and challenges. The development of the School was connected with the involvement of new people and successive generations of new students who joined in the cultivation of realistic philosophy. One can regard the years 1950–1966 as the first stage of the School’s development, in which the School’s program was formulated. The following stages are the years 1967–1980, and 1981–2004, and the years that follow, in which new generations of students who take up inquiries in the spirit of the School’s program arrive. The article also explains the reasons why today the Lublin Philosophical School cannot be identified with the Department of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin, but rather with a special style of cultivating philosophy.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 423-441
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
EXISTENTIAL DETERMINANTS OF THE LANGUAGE OF METAPHYSICS
Autorzy:
Kunat, Natalia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507276.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
language
metaphysics
realism
existential judgement
transcendentals
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Stanisław Kamiński
Opis:
The article presents the existential determinants of the language of metaphysics primarily on the basis of the philosophical stances adopted by Stanisław Kamiński and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec. Realistic philosophy, which focuses principally on the problem of being, uses the language of metaphysics, which helps in understanding reality in itself. Moreover, the article analyses the structure of the language of metaphysics as well as the existential elements constituting its specificity, i.e., among other things, existential judgement and transcendentals.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 2; 117-130
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Specyfika relacji transcendentalnych w ujęciu Mieczysława Alberta Krąpca
The Specificity of Transcendental Relations According to Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec
Autorzy:
Stoll, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507430.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-03-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Krąpiec
relation
conceptual relation
real relation
transcendental relation
realistic philosophy
metaphysics
Opis:
The paper is aimed at systematizing the thoughts of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec on the subject of relations. The author reconstructs Krąpiec’s justification for the reality of relations, the distinction of necessary relations, and the importance of relations in metaphysical cognition. The analyses are conducted on the basis of the following problems: a) the existence of beings, and especially the subontic relationship between essence and existence that runs through all reality; b) the way in which beings exist and are cognized, where transcendental relations indicate the analogous character of these beings; c) the cognition of the Absolute, which is only possible through the discovery of transcendental relations in contingent beings.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2020, 9, 1; 143-165
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór o koncepcję życia. Polemika Mieczysława A. Krąpca z Kazimierzem Kłósakiem
A dispute about the concept of life. Discussion of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec with Kazimierz Kłósak
Autorzy:
Sakowicz, Kacper K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078939.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
życie
Krąpiec
Kłósak
tomizm
stworzenie
ewolucja
metafizyka
Life
thomism
creation
evolution
metaphysics
Opis:
This paper presents a philosophical dispute on the nature and the origin of life. At the beginning author analyzes the central philosopical concepts of life which appeared in the history of philosophy and examines a main manifestations of life in its action. This inquiry leads to recogniton of a living substance as different from matter. Than author recalls the discussion between K. Kłósak and M. A. Krąpiec on the philosophical explanation of life and its genesis. Kłósak postulated a concept in which God have established such laws of nature, so the matter could yield life on its own. Krąpiec rejected Kłósak's concept of an indirect creation of life and argued that the only rational explanation of life is the special, direct act of God's creation. Krąpiec, relying on St. Thomas Aquinas, argued that God cannot use matter (or any other intermediary tools) in creation of a substance. Author concludes that reductionism in explanation of life bears ethical consequences, because cannot set any barriers to the artificial modifications of living organism.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 257-274
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
TO KNOW OR TO THINK—THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE UNDERSTANDING OF PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE LIGHT OF THE STUDIES OF MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC
Autorzy:
Duma, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507566.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
thinking
cognition
philosophy
knowledge
reality
abstract
sign
understanding
metaphysics
realism
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Opis:
The article concentrates on the specificity of philosophical cognition. Referring to Mieczysław A. Krąpiec’s study, the author proves that the process of thinking is not to be necessarily identified with the process of cognition, as in fact the former is merely a secondary phase of the latter. When identified with thinking, the philosophical cognition would undermine the very sense of cognition, which means the understanding of reality. When based on thinking alone, philosophy does not grasp real things, but operates with abstracts of being and being’s representations (concepts). As for the correctness of philosophical thinking the laws of logic, with ensuring non-contradictory operations, are sufficient enough. However, any knowledge that aspires to be philosophical has to start from really existing beings. In the next phases of cognition, such beings are grasped more and more particularly and precisely—starting from their transcendental properties and principles, then their structure and categorial properties, and finally their individual characteristics and actions. The very first act of cognition is directed to real beings, which are immediately grasped in respect of their existence and real essence. The second act of cognition deals with signs. The precedence of being in human cognition makes the philosophy charged not with a task of thinking about the world, but with the task of knowing and understanding it within possible and verifiable limits. Therefore, according to Krapiec, the very first philosophical discipline is metaphysics, which has real beings as its object. Thus, philosophical cognition should preserve its objective character, as this is the only way to guarantee its realism.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 277-299
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metafizyczny sens osoby i jej relacja do podmiotu. Rekonstrukcja ujęcia Mieczysława A. Krąpca i Karola Wojtyły
The metaphysical sense of the person and its relation to the subject. Reconstruction of the conclusions of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec and Karol Wojtyła
Autorzy:
Zięba, Włodzimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28761796.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
osoba
podmiot
metafizyka
samostanowienie
autodeterminacja
Krąpiec
Wojtyła
person
subject
metaphysics
self-existence
self-determination
Opis:
Źródła kategorii osoby sięgają religii i teologii chrześcijańskiej i zasadniczo stąd wypływa jej sens antropologiczny i współczesna kulturowa ranga. Koncepcja osoby w chrześcijaństwie służyła rozwiązaniu problemu wcielenia oraz dogmatu Trójcy Świętej. Pojęcie osoby współcześnie występuje w rozlicznych sensach. W artykule analizuję jej metafizyczny, substancjalny wymiar w oparciu o rozstrzygnięcia Krąpca i Wojtyły. Twierdzę, że w obydwu przypadkach kategoria osoby jest bliskoznaczna kategorii podmiotu. Atrybuty osoby, według Krąpca, to bytowa autonomia i podmiotowa zupełność bytowa, z czego wypływa nieudzielalność. Osoba w tym ujęciu to najwyższy stopień samoistności bytowej, szczytowa forma bytu. Podmiot zaś jest konsekwencją metafizycznego założenia, że wszelki akt jest bytowo niesamodzielny. U Wojtyły punktem wyjścia będzie czyn ludzki, który presuponuje istnienie osób. Poprzez czyn człowiek objawia się jako osoba wraz z jej strukturą samo-posiadania oraz samo-panowania. Czyn ujawnia sprawczość pewnego konkretnego człowieka, jego podmiotowość, czyli samoświadomą przyczynę, tj. samostanowienie i autodeterminację.
The origins of the category of the person go back to Christian religion and theology, and only from here does its anthropological meaning and cultural popularity flow. The concept of a person in Christianity served to solve the problem of the Incarnation and the Dogma of the Holy Trinity. The concept of a person is present in many senses today. In the article I analyze its metaphysical, substantial dimension based on the decisions of Krąpiec and Wojtyła. I argue that in both cases the category of the person is close to the scope of the category of the subject. The attributes of a person, according to Krąpiec, are ontic autonomy and subjective on-being completeness, which is the source of inability. In this approach, a person is the highest degree of being autonomous, the highest form of being. The subject, on the other hand, follows from the metaphysical assumption that any act is being dependent on existence. Wojtyła’s starting point will be a human act, that presupposes the existence of a person. Through deeds, man reveals himself as a person with his structure of self-possession and self-domination. The act reveals the agency of a specific man, his subjectivity, i.e. self-aware cause, i.e. self-determination and self-determination.
Źródło:
Tarnowskie Studia Teologiczne; 2021, 40, 2; 139-159
2391-6826
0239-4472
Pojawia się w:
Tarnowskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Personalism in the Lublin School of Philosophy (Card. Karol Wojtyła, Fr. Mieczysław A. Krąpiec)
Autorzy:
Duma, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507334.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Lublin School of Philosophy
Karol Wojtyła
Mieczysław Krąpiec
personalism
philosophy
metaphysics
person
man
experience
nature
culture
Opis:
The article presents the conception of personalism and the understanding of human person developed by two Polish philosophers: Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, the framers and the main representatives of the Lublin School of Philosophy. The author comes to the following conclusions: (1) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of personalism comes from experience and seeks verification in experience; it does not accept any a priori explanations or theses, though it does not shy away from drawing upon different branches of knowledge in its attempts to broaden experience, being aware that not everything is given to immediate experiential perception; (2) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s personalism wants to draw on the whole philosophical tradition, taking into account, at the same time, the findings of different sciences of man or humanities which broaden the experience of man or contribute something to the interpretation of experience; (3) bringing together genetic empiricism and methodical rationalism, Wojtyła and Krąpiec are able to avoid radicalism in the explanation of man, making a successful attempt to join in a complementary way these aspects of personal human being which carry some opposition; (4) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of person does not bear any traces of antagonism since it is not directed against anyone; in the light of this conception every human person has a character of the honest good which is the unconditional good, that is the highest and the ultimate good not competing with the value of anything else; (5) Wojtyła and Krąpiec prove that the conception of human person lies at the basis of understanding society, culture, ethics, law, politics, economy, art, and even religion.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 2; 365-390
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomizm egzystencjalny Mieczysława A. Krąpca a tomizm konsekwentny Mieczysława Gogacza. Ku analizie porównawczej
The Existential Thomism of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec and Consequential Thomism of Mieczysław Gogacz. Perspectives for Comparative Analysis
Autorzy:
Ćwiertniak, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078907.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec
Mieczysław Gogacz
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
filozofia
metafizyka
Thomas Aquinas
thomism
philosophy
metaphysics
Opis:
The aim of this article is to present the perspectives for a comparative analysis of the philosophical views of two renowned Polish representatives of existential Thomism. The authors mentioned above are known as the main representatives of the most important Polish Thomistic schools: Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec is the most important representative of the Lublin School of Classical Philosophy, while Mieczysław Gogacz is the founder of the Warsaw School of Consequential Thomism. At the base of this article, meant as an introduction to more advanced analyses, lies the conviction that mutual isolation between philosophical schools is harmful. It shows the necessity of a reciprocal confrontation of research results. In this paper, following a short historical introduction, the Author first presents the main areas in the thought of the two philosophers, which – due to differences in the concepts they employ – are most in need of thorough comparative research. Afterwards, the Author points out the most important achievements of both philosophers and makes an outline of the main difficulties and aporias connected with their ideas. Finally, an outline of further research is presented, which could help to overcome the aporias demonstrated here.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 173-195
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Krąpiec on the Specificity of Man
Autorzy:
Ugwuanyi, Faustinus I.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507584.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-03-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
man
human being
human person
specificity of man
anthropology
metaphysics
animal rationale
animal culturale
animal sociale
homo faber
homo religiosus
Opis:
The author presents selected insights offered by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, O.P., about the specificity of man. He starts with making a methodological remark about the correlation between Krąpiec’s anthropology and metaphysics. Then, he tries to grasp essentials in Krąpiec’s interpretation of attributes traditionally indicated as defining man alone, namely animal rationale, animal culturale, animal sociale, homo faber, and homo religiosus. Finally, he concludes that, although all these attributes aptly describe the specificity of man, they all are reducible to the fact that man is a person.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 1; 169-180
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Autorzy:
Chudy, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507466.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Krąpiec
Lublin Philosophical School
Catholic University of Lublin
Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
philosophy
metaphysics
realism
Thomism
existential judgment
metaphysical separation
metaphysical language
transcendentalizing cognition
theory of analogy
sovereign person
Opis:
This article introduces the life and work of Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec (1921-2008)—a Polish philosopher, theologian, humanist, co-founder of the Lublin Philosophical School, rector of the Catholic University of Lublin, initiator and chairman of the scientific committee of The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Krąpiec created a coherent philosophical system that, by a metaphysical explanation, encompassed the whole of reality that is accessible to human cognition. According to the author, Krąpiec’s philosophy is the greatest achievement in classical philosophy in Poland and in the world in the twentieth century, both with respect to its comprehensive scope and its meritorious importance; for the vision of the world that it reveals shows not only the human person’s unity and harmony with the reality that surrounds him, but also his openness to a connection with the transcendent Absolute.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2018, 7, 4; 549-566
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies