Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "prison inmates" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The Artistic Statements of Inmates about Freedom: the “Labyrinth of Freedom” Project and Its Possible Applications
Wypowiedzi artystyczne więźniów na temat wolności: projekt "labirynt wolności" i jego mozliwe zastosowania
Autorzy:
Piotrowski, Przemysław
Bajek, Zbigniew
Florek, Stefan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/593770.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
art
prison
freedom
inmates
psychotherapy
sztuka
więzienie
wolność
osadzeni
psychoterapia
Opis:
It is characteristic for the male prison community that showing one’s attitudes, beliefs and feelings is quite risky. In such an oppressive environment the inmates exhibit various strategies of adjustment. In some cases getting involved in artistic activities is not only a way of spending the time of isolation constructively, but it may also become a stimulus for some positive changes after the inmate’s release. The aim of this article is to describe the “Labyrinth of Freedom” project conducted at the penitentiary in Nowy Wisnicz, near Krakow, Poland, in 2012 and to discuss the inmate's comments on freedom, the theme of the artistic project. Some possible benefits of the inmates’ artistic activity are also identified. The analyzed data consists of a se-lected set of inmates’ works, which share the common theme of freedom. The authors are convinced that the project had a therapeutic value because it created a chance for the inmates to express themselves through art and to reach the “outside” audience. Moreover, within the framework of the project, the inmates’ works were given the same status as the works of professional artists, which should have had a positive impact on the inmates’ self-esteem. Their artistic expression increased their sense of importance in the prison community, by reducing their feeling of isolation and dehumanization. The project was then an opportunity to develop the inmates’ awareness, and so to help them take a big step on the path to personal development and freedom.
Specyfika społeczności więziennej sprawia, że nieskrępowane ujawnianie swoich postaw, przekonań lub uczuć jest ryzykowne. W tej specyficznej sytuacji psychologicznej, której istotnymi składowymi są przemoc, nuda i poczucie osamotnienia, osadzeni przejawiają różne wzorce przystosowania. Dla niektórych z nich zaangażowanie się w działalność artystyczną może być nie tylko sposobem na konstruktywne spędzanie czasu, ale także bodźcem do pozytywnych zmian po wyjściu na wolność. Celem artykułu jest dokonanie charakterystyki projektu „Labirynt wolności”, zrealizowanego w 2012 roku w Zakładzie Karnym w Nowym Wiśniczu, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wypowiedzi osadzonych na temat wolności. Podsumowaniem opracowania są wnioski dotyczące możliwości diagnostycznego i terapeutycznego wykorzystania artystycznych wypowiedzi osób pozbawionych wolności. Autorzy są przekonani, że opisany projekt, poprzez stwarzanie więźniom możliwości nawiązania dialogu z osobami „z zewnątrz” i kontaktu ze środkami ekspresji, które oferuje sztuka, ma wymiar terapeutyczny. Może przyczynić się do zredukowania stresu izolacji, podnieść samoocenę i zmniejszyć poczucie alienacji. Jest szansą rozwijania świadomości, a więc zrobie-nia istotnego kroku na drodze ku osobistej wolności.
Źródło:
Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts; 2013, 15; 213-229
1641-9278
Pojawia się w:
Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O tzw. dobrych praktykach penitencjarnych. Obraz empiryczny i kilka ogólniejszych refleksji teoretycznych
On the So-called Good Penitentiary Practices. An Empirical Picture and Several More General Theoretical Reflections
Autorzy:
Stępniak, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698769.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
zakład karny
więzienie
praca penitencjarna
dobra praktyka wykonawcza
prison
inmates
penitentiary work
good executive practice
Opis:
The article discusses the issue of good penitentiary practices. It fits into the discussionabout how to work with inmates in prison, what axiological and substantive basis offersan alternative, new logic of interactions against the crisis of penitentiary resocialisation.According to the author, this discussion should be concentrated on the followingquestions: what can be achieved in prison conditions; how to work with prisoners; whatgoals should be present in penitentiary work. One of the ways of working is, therefore,good practice. The author discusses theoretical and methodological aspects of researchon good practices and defines them. He points out that what is usually referred toas a good practice is an action that has brought concrete, positive results, has somepotential for innovation, is durable, repeatable and applicable to similar conditionselsewhere or by other entities.According to the author, the sources of good penitentiary practices can be soughtin various areas of knowledge, experience and legal regulations. Most importantly, heindicates: praxeology and pragmatism, realism (with regard to what can be achievedin a total institution in given organisational, social and economic conditions), wisdomand experience of prison staff (conformism), international prison rules, penitentiarynational law and pedagogical interaction models. All these sources are discussed indetail.In the further part of the article, the results of research on good penitentiarypractices are discussed. They were carried out between January 2015 and September2016 in five largest prisons from the area of the District Inspectorate of the PrisonService in Poznań (prisons in Poznań, Gębarzewo, Krzywaniec, Rawicz andWronki). They were all of a closed type. The study covered a group of 180 convictsand 32 educators. In addition, 100 personal files were analysed for the mannerof penitentiary work described in them.Research shows that employment of convicts was the most desirable activity, es -pecially appreciated by the educators. In their opinion, referral to work organisestime, sets the rhythm and structure of the day. The work environment is also outsideof the cell. The convicts can go out, meet people from outside prison. This is especiallyvaluable in a closed-type penitentiary. Daily performance of professional duties developsa work habit, teaches responsibility, cooperation, understanding and duty.The second type of desirable interventions was organising and facilitating contactswith relatives. The third one was implementation of, and engaging convicts in, variouspenitentiary programmes. The programme offers possibilities for innovation andcan be repeated. It also provides an opportunity to use specialist preparation andinventiveness of its author (prison educator). The author of the article estimates that only the development and use of penitentiary programmes can be considereda good penitentiary practice according to the criteria given in the article. Other typesof influence pointed out by educators and convicts lie simply in the good performanceof duties by the prison staff. Therefore, they do not provide a starting point to proposesome new theoretical concept of penitentiary interactions.Commenting on these findings, the author assesses that the scientific way of defininggood practices is clearly not in line with how they are understood by prison staff.The former is determined by the criteria indicated in the article, the pragmatic realismof the other. It results from the pressure of prison conditions, and it is not enough togeneralise it to the theoretical level.Therefore, in the final part of the article the author poses the question how theobtained results can be used. In response, he states that the actions indicated by therespondents as desirable can be divided into two groups. The first one includes generalpenitent actions (e.g. differentiation of impacts on prisoners into long-term and shorttermones, intensification of interactions aimed at managing the prisoners’ free time,matching interactions according to the sentence execution’s phase), whereas the secondrefers to interactions aimed at intensifying an individual approach to pri soners (e.g. anindividualised plan of serving the sentence, better knowledge of the convicts, payingmore attention to their interests, reacting to their problems).In conclusion, the author of the article states that its findings provide the basis onlyfor formulating a catalogue of methodical, organisational and functional guidelines.He gives examples of such directives as well as the actions indicated as desirable byprison’s educators and inmates.The article ends with the remark that the catalogue of methodical guidelines isa kind of a prison penitentiary code, assuming the use of means and methods that canpotentially be implemented in prison conditions.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 2018, XL; 401-430
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies