Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Andrzejuk, Artur" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Etyka chronienia osób. Zarys problematyki
Ethics of person protection. An outline of problems
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452549.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
etyka
osoba
relacje osobowe
Mieczysław Gogacz
sumienie
kontemplacja
mądrość
metanoia
kultura
ethics
person
personal relations
conscience
contemplation
wisdom
culture
Opis:
Ethics of person protection has been based on theory of person and emerging from it concept of personal relations. Thus, it should be recognized as personalistic ethics, if we understand personalism as a theory based on an account of a person. Such an ethics is an example of inferring conclusions from Thomistic metaphysics of person and human being – thus, it is Thomistic ethics par excellence. There could be question posed, in what extent proposed by Mieczysław Gogacz and his followers version of Thomistic ethics refers to classical Aristotelian and Thomistic eudaimonism? It seems that the core of the proposition relies on inferring conclusions from Thomas’ theory of love, in which love is the source of every human acts, is the principle of habituation and virtues as well as the most desired interpersonal relation. All these aspects Aquinas poses in his modifications of the Greek eudaimonism. For Thomas, the only good which results in happiness relies on relations with person – God or people. Mieczysław Gogacz continues this thread, but he does not concentrate only on problems of aims and happiness, because protection of person is an proper aim for him and protection is accomplished within relating with person through faith, hope and mainly love, and results in human happiness. We could therefore say, that ethics of protection of person is a modification of Aristotle’s ethics inasmuch as Thomism is modification of his metaphysics: Thomas Aquinas pays attention on the basic role of love in ethics and life, Mieczysław Gogacz has established love the basic pivot of his ethical and pedagogical theories.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2014, 3; 23-41
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966034.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
moralność
tomizm
filozofia analityczna
Ethics
morality
Thomism
analytic philosophy
Opis:
The notion of ethics has been developed by Bocheński in four areas: 1. Ethics is a normative science regarding human behaviour. Its scientific character means a „systematic research on a particular part of reality”. In the result of its normativity it „not only describes object but also indicates what this object should be like”. When speaks of human behaviour it „makes research on this set of acts who derive consciously (voluntarily) from human free will”. 2. Ethics as a normative science makes research and establishes general goal of human activity and then it considers, from the psychological point of view, a nature of human act which should be an act of realisation of a goal. In this way ethics works out the problem of ethical norm, a principle which should be followed to fulfill human act in order to achieve a goal proper to human being. Additionally, when ethics is grounded in Christian Revelation we may apply the matter of grace as supernatural support from God in fulfilling ethically good human act. 3. „There are two areas of each properly constructed ethics”. The first, in a theoretical way considers five sets of problems: the general goal of human act, the structure of human act, the problem of moral norms, the theory of character and the subject of God’s grace. The aim of the second area is practical analysis of particular features of human character, we understand them as „steady dispo-sition toward proceeding human act easily and energetic” according to a moral norm. 4. Ethics understood in that way can be atrributed to each human being. Hence, each men should adopt and cultivate in himself all properties and ethical norms. „Each human being should posses entirely human and Christian character”. 5. Individual human life shows that a teacher suppose to be equippped in some properties more than a merchant. For that reason, even there exists unity in ethics in general, we may speak of particular ethics. They consists of general ethics and on that ground they develop further principles in particular domains. In the result there may exist business ethics, academic ethics, ethics of prie-sthood, political ethics and military one.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 385-391
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Epistemologiczne i etyczne aspekty teorii relacji osobowych w Elementarzu metafizyki Mieczysława Gogacza
Epistemic and Ethical Aspects of Theory of Personal Relations in The Primer of Metaphysics of Mieczysław Gogacz
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2040421.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-03-30
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Mieczysław Gogacz
Tomasz z Akwinu
teoria relacji osobowych
epistemologia
etyka
własności transcendentalne
Thomas Aquinas
theory of personal relations
epistemology
ethics
transcendental properties
Opis:
Profesor Mieczysław Gogacz uważa, że własności transcendentalne, przejawiające akt istnienia bytu, są podstawą jedynych realnych relacji, które byt osobowy nawiązuje z innymi bytami. Można więc powiedzieć – korzystając ze znanej formuły Leibniza – że transcendentalia są oknami i drzwiami bytu, gdy „okna” uznamy za poznawanie, a „drzwi” – za działanie. Sposobem, w jaki się to dokonuje są relacje istnieniowe, czyli takie relacje, które według Autora Elementarza metafizyki są wyznaczane przez własności transcendentalne: miłość budująca się na realności (res), wiara wyznaczana przez własność prawdy (verum) oraz nadzieja, której fundamentem jest transcendentalna własność dobra (bonum). To ujęcie ma swoje konsekwencje przede wszystkim w antropologii filozoficznej, którą Gogacz uważa za metafizykę człowieka, ale także w teorii poznania i w etyce, na co chcielibyśmy zwrócić uwagę w tym artykule.
Professor Mieczysław Gogacz says that transcendental properties, through which we observe act of existence of being, serve as a fundament of the sole real relations which a personal being initiates towards other beings. Hence, we may conclude that—following the famous Leibniz’s formula—that transcendentals are the windows and door of being, while as „windows” we understand cognition and activities as „door”. This pattern is, as Gogacz claims, accomplished through existential relations, which are indicated by, in other words derive from, transcendental properties such as: love which is built on reality (res), faith built on property of truth (verum) and hope whose fundament we find in transcendental property of good (bonum). Presented approach has its consequences, for the most part in anthropological philosophy understood by Gogacz as metaphysics of man and in theory of knowledge and ethics, to what issue we would like to turn attention in this paper.
Źródło:
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze; 2022, 13, 1; 53-64
2082-8578
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Antropologiczne podstawy etyki
Anthropological foundations of ethics
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078909.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
etyka
osoba ludzka
intelekt
wola
sumienie
ethics
human person
Thomas Aquinas
intellect
will
conscience
Opis:
The belief in the uniqueness of man was shared by many philosophers who have represented different ways of thinking. Plato recognized man as a soul imprisoned in the body. The world of gods and ideas was the homeland of the soul, whereas soul was only a pilgrim in earthly world. Using empirical cognition in accordance with a methodology Aristotle claimed that man is a rational animal. This rationality was so special to Aristotle that he regarded it as divine. Thomas Aquinas inherits the Aristotelian tradition, enriched by the views of Cicero, Augustine and Arab philosophers. Ethics is most often described as "moral philosophy", which seems to indicate that it is about the science of morality, which is an integral part of philosophy. As such, it deals with principles (principles). In the case of ethics these are the principles of choosing the moral good. In this way Aquinas defines the subject of ethics. It is different from the subjects of other philosophical disciplines. In Aquinas's approach, ethics is autonomous in terms of subject, but methodologically it depends on metaphysics and anthropology. Also, the starting points of ethical reflection lies in first philosophy (metaphysics) and human philosophy (philosophical anthropology). According to the anthropological foundations of ethics, these are, according to Thomas, some consequences of human nature as a personal being. At the same time, it is worth noting that the topic of a person and personal relationships goes beyond human philosophy, because God is also a person who establishes personal relationships with other persons. As part of human philosophy, we examine the consequences of being a person that relate to human existence. They have a significant impact on human morality. These are: individuality, rationality, freedom and the already mentioned personal relationships. The consequences of this personal structure in man is having intellect and will, which results in intellectual cognition and free decision making. The very "mechanism" of behavior, which is always individual, is explained by Aquinas by the means of his concept of conscience, which in his ethics is the subjective principle of morality.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 157-172
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Józefa M. Bocheńskiego elementarz etyki wojskowej
Autorzy:
Niepsuj, Jerzy
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966053.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Józef Bocheński
etyka
etyka wojskowa
tomizm
męstwo
Ethics
military ethics
Thomism
bravery
Opis:
Military ethics as one of a „special ethics” is built, according to Bocheński, on morally obvious right to self-defense and obligation to defend the closest people. It is related to patriotism understood as love of the country, love is a prominent value in defense of which man is willing to sacrifice his life. With regard to characteristics of a soldier Bocheński suggests the following shape of skills and virtues proper for a military job: of prime importance is bravery, connected rather with heroism and honour than with patience and persistence. Also, virtues demanded for the process of taking decision are, as Bocheński claims, key for all militaries regardless their rank, because even the lowest, a private soldier has to decide. When it comes to taking decision, the most essential is a set of skills and values which enable its accurate conduct. Apart from suitable knowledge and skills there are wisdom and prudence as the most important virtues in taking decision. The most significant virtues of superiors, according to Bocheński, are integrity and justice, generosity and humility. Integrity means respect for law. Justice regulates all human relations. Generosity is related to a task of being a superior, and always to some socially important good, furthermore, it is a task of a superior to guide toward that important good. Humility, hence, is a condition to judge themselves and the others properly, what is indispensable for managing people. Taking decisions and superiority are related to a question of military obedience. Ethical fundament of that obedience is common good, to which army is subordinated. That common good is a principle which joins efforts of both, superiors and subordinates. The first condition of obedience is conviction that all members of community serve the same common goal. Order received from a su-perior can be a decision held at one of its stage. There are situations when an order speaks only about the task of planned activity, or it can indicate a set of means available or it may just order so-me action. The virtue of obedience means that we do not question and ponder on particular stages of a process of decision performed by superior but proceed as effectively as possible until the task is fulfilled. In his military ethics Józef Bocheński promotes the ethos of Polish soldier as a knight, hence the spiritual culture is a matter of prime importance in the army. It is crucial to develop this culture within a proper, which is humanist, frame. Advanced development of military technology must be accompanied by a care for advanced moral development.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 393-404
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies