Temat: wealth distribution - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: How to Define Property Rights? A Social Documentation of the Privatization of Collective Ownership
Autorzy:: Xiaoye, Zhe
Yingying, Chen
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1929553.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2009-09-29
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne
Tematy:: privatization
collective ownership
distribution of wealth
property rights
Opis:: Since rural China began to implement economic structural reforms in the late 1970s, township and village collective enterprises (TVEs) have attained significant expansion for a long time. They have became not only sections with most rapid economic development, but also experimental sites for the rural reconstruction of “common prosperity.” However, since the mid-1990s, TVEs have been experiencing a property rights transformation of rapid privatization. One of the noteworthy social consequences of this transformation is how the redefinition of property rights may lead to new differentiation and distribution of wealth and resources, in whose hands will wealth concentrate, and whether the concentration process will lead to new inequalities. Exploring the social process of property rights definition can help our understanding and analysis of these questions. Moreover, empirical materials concerning this process are complete and abundant, furnishing the sufficient conditions for new examinations and summaries on their basis.
Źródło:: Polish Sociological Review; 2009, 167, 3; 351-372
1231-1413
2657-4276
Pojawia się w:: Polish Sociological Review
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: The Purpose of the Tax System that Gives Meaning and Legitimacy to Taxes
Autorzy:: Muñoz López, José Luis
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/36099046.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:: Constitution
taxes
distribution of wealth
law and justice
Opis:: The purpose of this article is to analyze the ultimate purpose of the tax system that gives meaning and legitimacy to taxation. The citizen thus becomes an integral part of the State, has the ability to elect its representatives through suffrage. The law is a guarantee of equality and justice that provides legal security, facilitating peace and coexistence. This guarantee is manifested through the constitutional system (Alvarado Plana, 2016: 193–195), where the Constitution (Escudero, 2012: 857–858) becomes the legislative framework and the supreme norm of the entire legal system that orders the coexistence of citizens and ensures the proper functioning of the State. The tax system is defined as a revenue collection tool to cover the needs of the State, but there is certainly more than that: to achieve the goal of equality, justice, freedom, peace and well-being of the society, but also to guarantee the sustainability of the system, achieve progress and social peace. It is also essential to attract investment, create wealth and achieve proper development within the European Union (Sampedro, 2010: 300–309). Methodology. The analysis includes the basic values and principles assumed by Spanish culture, the evolution towards a modern society in which the citizen has rights and duties enshrined in the Constitution that justifies and legitimizes tax system and therefore taxes and a critical vision and an approach to our tax model through its ultimate purpose to contribute to defray public spending. All of these based on the principles and values established in the Spanish Constitution, which enshrines the rights of the citizen and, through them, supports the conception of the State itself. It also provides a modern approach to the future of our society and guarantees the legitimacy of our tax system. The result of the research. The analysis shows that the ultimate goal of the tax system is to contribute to public spending by the State. Therefore, in the contribution and control of spending, we find the guarantee that the State has healthy public accounts (deficit reduction, less public debt, and strict control of spending), so that the State has greater sovereignty and economic decision-making capacity. It allows the country to meet the objectives of the Constitution for any advanced society, such as peace, equality, justice, freedom and well-being of its citizens.
Źródło:: Finanse i Prawo Finansowe; 2022, Numer Specjalny: Challenges for National Tax Policies and International Tax Coordination – Selected Issues from the Polish, Spanish and International Perspectives; 15-33
2391-6478
2353-5601
Pojawia się w:: Finanse i Prawo Finansowe
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Czym właściwie jest Kapitał w XXI wieku? Garść uwag na temat książki Thomasa Piketty’ego
So what is Capital in the Twenty-First Century? Some notes on Piketty’s book
Autorzy:: Kornai, János
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/904382.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2016
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej
Tematy:: kapitał
nierówności
podział bogactwa
wzrost
dynamika
konkurencja
motywacja do działania
wpływ postępu technicznego na wszystkie dziedziny życia
capital
inequality
distribution of wealth
growth
dynamics
competition
motivation to act
impact of technological progress on all aspects of life
Opis:: Zdaniem Jánosa Kornaia, mimo niewątpliwych walorów poznawczych książki Kapitał w XXI wieku, jej autor prezentuje cząstkową, zniekształconą analizę funkcjonowania systemu kapitalistycznego, która prowadzi go do błędnych wniosków oraz do sformułowania bardzo ograniczonego repertuaru zaleceń dla polityków. Węgierski ekonomista zarzuca Thomasowi Piketty’emu przede wszystkim pominięcie takich aspektów kapitalizmu, jak: dynamika, konkurencja jako bodziec do działania, postęp techniczny i jego wpływ na kształtowanie wszystkich aspektów współczesnego życia człowieka. Kornai swoje poglądy ilustruje licznymi przykładami zaczerpniętymi z prac innych ekonomistów.
According to János Kornai, despite the undeniable original contribution of Capital in the Twenty-First Century, its author offers a partial and distorted analysis of the functioning of the capitalist system, which leads him to mistaken conclusions and to a very limited repertoire of recommendations for politicians. The Hungarian economist criticizes Thomas Piketty particularly for the omission of such aspects as the dynamics of capitalism, competition as a stimulus to act, technical progress and its impact on all aspects of modern human life. He illustrates his views with numerous examples taken from the work of other economists.
Źródło:: Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance; 2016, 2(36); 7-33
1898-3529
2658-1116
Pojawia się w:: Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "wealth distribution" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język