Wszystkie pola: dialogika - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Między dramatyką a dialogiką
Between drama and dialogue
Autorzy:: Kot, Dobrosław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/426641.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:: drama
dialogue
tension
encounter
game
salvation
damnation
Opis:: Józef Tischner’s philosophy of drama belongs to the tradition of philosophy of dialogue. However a “drama” (the keyword of that philosophy) origins in a different approach to philosophy of man. Whereas the dialogue is an encounter, a love, a responsibility for the Other, a lack of distance – the drama is a fight, tension, sometimes even a mortal combat. Dialogue is an opening for the Other while drama is a game between salvation and damnation. Tischner does explain fundamental human experience and human relations by this term in the same time. The tension between these two concepts is presented and considered in the paper. An analysis of contexts, where these terms appear, helps to see mutual influences and how they modify one another their meaning. The sense of dialogue changes in philosophy of drama, the drama acquires a new meaning. A term tension becomes crucial for this relation.
Źródło:: Logos i Ethos; 2014, 1(36); 53-72
0867-8308
Pojawia się w:: Logos i Ethos
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Od Platona do Rosenzweiga. O zapoznanej roli dialogu w strukturze filozofii
From Plato to Rosenzweig: On the Relinquished Role of Dialogue in the Structure of Philosophy
Autorzy:: Bardel, Michał
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013941.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2005
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: dialog
filozofia dialogu
dialogika
rozmowa
Platon
Rosenzweig
dialogue
philosophy of dialogue
conversation
Plato
Opis:: The main purpose of the article is to compare the originally Greek, Plato’s concept of dialogue and its function in the procedure of philosophying to the one developed by the 20- century “philosophy of dialogue” (F. Rosenzweig, M. Buber, F. Ebner, E. Levinas). It seems quite astounding that philosophy of dialogue, a trend which consistently and persistently defends the privileged position of dialogue in the structure of reality and uses it as an essential factor in the understanding of the relation between God and Man, has not developed any solid methodological perspective. What is even worse, it failed to observe its presence in the very core of philosophical thinking, i.e. in Plato’s thought. We are capable of reconstructing Plato’s modus philosophandi with its essential conditions: the philosopher must not only ‘see’ the truth (the noetical function), but must also tell it to the others, choose the partners of the dialogue and defend his logos if necessary (the apophantical function). The article consists of two complementary analyses: the first one is devoted to the presentation of the dialogical factor in Plato’s noetics and apophantics, and the second one focuses on Rosenzweig’s criticism of the whole European philosophy. The author tries to indicate its doubtful moments by putting forward the question whether Plato’s philosophy may be justly ascribed to the tradition under Rosenzweig’s criticism, and if so, to what extent.
Źródło:: Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2005, 53, 1; 5-26
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "dialogika" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język