Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela w aktualnie obowiązującym kanonicznym prawie karnym (Eucharystia)
Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela in currently applicable Canon Penal Law (Eucharist)
Autorzy:
Borek, Dariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/553508.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-12-31
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Misyjne Księży Sercanów
Tematy:
przestępstwa kanoniczne
przestępstwa zastrzeżone dla Kongregacji Nauki Wiary
sankcje karne
ochrona sakramentów
sakramenty
Eucharystia
Pokuta
święcenia kapłańskie
Normy De delictis reservatis 2010
canonical delicts
delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
penal sanctions
protection of the sacraments
sacraments
Eucharist
Penance
Priestly Ordinations
The Norms De delictis reservatis of 2010
Opis:
Pope John Paul II in the Motu Proprio Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela on 30 April 2001 promulgated the norms concerning the gravest crimes reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Such an intervention of the Church, as the Pope explained, was required by the necessity to protect the sanctity of the sacraments, especially those of the Most Holy Sacrament and Sacrifice of the Eucharist and Sacrament of Penance, as well as the need to keep the purity of morality in regard to the sixth commandment of the Decalogue. The Church, driven by pastoral concern and keeping in mind the ultimate goal of any Church law, which should be salus animarum, intervenes to prevent any violation in such serious and delicate matter as the sacraments. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued on 18 May 2001 a letter to the Ordinaries and Hierarchs of the Roman Catholic Church describing the new crimes reserved to the Congregation and the procedural norms to be followed in these cases. Nine years after the promulgation of De gravioribus delictis norms, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith modified them, integrating and updating them in order to simplify the procedures, so that they could become more effective in solving contemporary problems. The modified norms concerning the crimes reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith were presented to Pope Benedict XVI who approved of them on 21 May 2010 and ordered to promulgate them. De delictis reservatis norms of 2010 consist of two parts: the first one, Normae substantiales, from article 1 to 7, and the second one including articles 8-31. The first part describes the competence of the Congregation, the crimes belonging to the delicta reservata category, and the norms concerning the prescription of actio criminalis in case of delicta reservata. The latter part defines the procedures in case of delicta reservata for which the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is the Supreme Apostolic Tribunal. This article analyses only those of the crimes reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which refer to the sacraments of the Eucharist. It should be stated that both existing and new norms concerning delicta graviora show great concern of the Church for the protection of the sacraments. On the other hand, which seems alarming, the necessity to update the norms protecting the sacraments indicates their relatively frequent violation. In the context of possible violations of dignified and valid administration of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist, the knowledge and right interpretation of the Church norms promulgated to protect these sacraments seem vital.
Źródło:
Sympozjum; 2016, 2(31); 41-72
2543-5442
Pojawia się w:
Sympozjum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przedawnienie skarg i działań z tytułu naruszeń będących przestępstwami kanonicznymi
The prescription of penal actions and operations resulting from canon delicts violations
Autorzy:
Borek, Dariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1371677.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-07
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
przestępstwo
kanoniczne prawo karne
kanoniczny proces karny
skarga karna
skarga o naprawienie szkód
przedawnienie
przestępstwa za-rezerwowane Kongregacji Nauki Wiary
cywilna odpowiedzialność
dyscyplinarna odpowiedzialność
wydalenie z instytutu
Delict
penal canon law
penal canon process
criminal action
action to execute a penalty
prescription
delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
civil responsibility
disciplinary responsibility
dismissal from the institute
Opis:
Violations constituting canon delicts incur certain legal effects, both penal and non penal. Among strictly penal effects one can find a possibility to call a perpetrator to account. In order to do this The Canon Law Code of 1983 classifies two types of actions connected with the committed delict: a criminal action (actio criminalis) and an action to execute a penalty (actionad poenam exsequendam), or a penal action. A violation which is a crime may result in other, non penal effects such as an action to repair the damage caused by the crime (actio ad damna reparanda), a declaration of an obstacle to ordination, or a dismissal from a religious institute. The prescription, which is the subject of this article, is thus connected with different possible effects incurred by a violation constituting a canon delict.Keeping all those possible consequences of violations constituting canon delicts, it seems legitimate to establish the matter of the prescription. Trying to find the answers to these questions, the author tries to focus on the following issues: 1. Prescription. 1.1. Introductory issues. 1.2. Principal terms and elements. 2. Prescription within penal responsibility 2.1. Imposing and executing a penalty. 2.2. Declaring a penalty. 2.3. Delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 3. Prescription within civil and disciplinary responsibility 3.1. Action to repair damage. 3.2. Dismissal from a religious institute.
Źródło:
Prawo Kanoniczne; 2019, 62, 3; 55-88
2353-8104
Pojawia się w:
Prawo Kanoniczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies