Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "deliberative democracy" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 35
Tytuł:
Deliberative democracy and citizenship
Autorzy:
Pietrzyk-Reeves, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026741.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
democracy
citizenship
deliberative democracy
models of democracy
Opis:
The model of deliberative democracy poses a number of dificult questions about individual rationality, public reason and justification, public spiritedness, and an active and supportive public sphere. It also raises the question about what kind of civic involvement is required for the practices of democratic deliberation to be effective. The aim of this article is to examine the last question by looking at the role and value of citizenship understood in terms of participation. It argues that deliberative democracy implies a category of democratic citizens; its institutional framework calls for the activity and competence of citizenry, and consequently, the participatory forms of deliberative democracy come closest to the democratic ideal as such. Also, the model of participatory-deliberative democracy is more attractive as a truly democratic ideal than the model of formal deliberative democracy, but it certainly faces more dificulties when it comes to the practicalities, and especially the institutional design. This problem is raised in the last section of the article where the possible applicability of such a model to post-communist democracies is addressed. The major dificulty that the participatory-deliberative model poses for the post-communist democratization can be explained by a reference to the cultural approach towards democratization and to the revised modernization theory presented by Inglehart and Welzel. The problem of the applicability of such a model in the post-communist context seems to support the thesis presented here which suggests that active citizenship, civic skills and civic culture are indispensable for the development of deliberative politics.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2006, 35; 43-64
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Słabości i niedostatki procedur demokracji deliberacyjnej
The limitations and shortcomings of deliberative democracy procedures
Autorzy:
Krzewińska, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/413263.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
demokracja deliberacyjna
deliberacja
procedury demokracji deliberacyjnej
facylitator
deliberative democracy
deliberation
procedures of deliberative democracy
facilitator
Opis:
W artykule zostały omówione dwie kwestie. Po pierwsze, wskazano na cechy systemów demokratycznych, które są krytykowane przez zwolenników demokracji deliberacyjnej. Taka perspektywa pozwoliła na prezentację najważniejszych cech demokracji deliberacyjnej. Charakteryzując ten typ demokracji, odniesiono się również do samej procedury deliberacji, czyli grupowego namysłu nad ważnymi kwestiami o wymiarze społecznym, politycznym i gospodarczym. Po drugie, przeprowadzono krytykę demokracji deliberacyjnej, ale nie odnosząc się do jej filozoficzny założeń, lecz wskazując na problemy, które wynikają ze stosowania właściwych dla demokracji deliberacyjnej procedur. Artykuł kończy prezentacja przyczyn niezwykle rzadkiego wykorzystywania procedur deliberacyjnych w Polsce oraz trudności z jakimi wiąże się ich realizacja.
This article presents two main issues. Firstly, it shows the characteristics of democracy which are criticised by supporters of deliberative democracy. This perspective makes it possible to present the main attributes of deliberative democracy. The characteristics of this type of democracy refer to the procedures of deliberation, as a general reflection on important social, political, and economic issues. Secondly, the paper criticises deliberative democracy by showing the problems associated with the implementation of procedures, without considering the philosophical background of the issue under discussion. The article concludes with the presentation of an extremely rare application of the procedures of deliberative democracy in Poland, and the troubles connected with its realisation.
Źródło:
Przegląd Socjologiczny; 2017, 66, 3; 45-72
0033-2356
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Partycypacja obywatelska w demokracji deliberacyjnej ku dobru wspólnemu
Civil participation in deliberative democracy towards the common good
Autorzy:
Stadniczeńko, Stanisław Leszek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697317.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Opolski
Tematy:
civil participation
deliberative democracy
common good
Opis:
The author draws attention to the consideration of the complexity of civil participation in deliberative democracy, indicating that the legislator assumed that dialogue is to be a way of existence, and thus the basis of any social situation in the state. State authorities appointed to serve the people and the common good have to ask citizens about their position in the case, not in order to obtain the desired response, thus emphasizing the departure from the monologue culture in favor of dialogue and communication with the public. The author claims that the normative foundations of the community state are linked by the conviction that public values and purposes are established in the communication process. In this approach, it is important to achieve public purposes and the quality of their achievement, its constructive features are: network, multi-level management, conciliation, participation. The basic mechanisms of action of this type of state are: deliberation, compromise and arrangements are made in the social networks – the dominant type of management of public affairs in this model is co-management. Solicitude of the state as a common good obliges not only a citizen, but means that a citizen has the right to expect that public authority will act so that the Republic of Poland can be considered a common good by citizens. Referring to literature, the author notes that deliberative democracy and its concept put more emphasis on the importance of conversation, discussion and debate on democratic practice than on the importance of voting. Its supporters argue that the debate improves the quality of collective decisions and increases the chances of their acceptance. Varieties of deliberative democracy range from accentuating local representation to reinforcing the debate within representative legislative bodies. The article points out the differences between discourse and deliberation. Moreover, the forms of civic participation and civic participation techniques used in Poland are presented. We have come to live in times when communication, both traditional and with the help of modern media, plays a significant role in shaping societies. It is important to understand the basic laws guiding communication, the ability to properly form interpersonal relationships, cognize the factors affecting the quality of messages transmitted, the technique of freedom of expression, the skill of persuasion and argumentation. The correct perception of the essence of dialogue in a deliberative democracy is its foundation, especially when it concerns institutions aimed at turning natural and legal persons to public decision-making process. Considering the literature, it was found that new participative solutions, primarily the ability to dialogue, could prevent a democratic deficit and also indicated that that civic participation impacts on the creation of deliberative democracy.
Źródło:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2019, 17, 3; 151-171
2658-1922
Pojawia się w:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Preventing the Atrophy of the Deliberative Stance: Considering Non-Decisional Participation as a Prerequisite to Political Freedom
Autorzy:
Zabdyr-Jamróz, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2200446.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Projekt Avant
Tematy:
deliberative democracy
deliberative stance
preference change
deliberative systems
Opis:
In order to be exercised meaningfully, political freedom requires the capacity to actually identify available policy options. To ensure this, society ought to engage in deliberation as a discussion oriented towards mutual learning. In order to highlight this issue, I define deliberation in terms of the participants’ openness to preference change, i.e. the deliberative stance. In the context of the systemic approach to deliberative theory, I find several factors causing the atrophy of such a deliberative stance. I note that this state can occur not only when debaters are representatives or are in the presence of an audience, but also when they face the prospect of a binding decision. It is the latter effect that is a serious challenge to the micro-deliberative strategy, one that strives towards decisional powers being granted to deliberative minipublics. Presenting my findings, I propose—as an alternative to the power-oriented ‘ladder of participation’—a distinction between traditional co-decision and deliberative consultation, the latter one being (in certain systemic contexts) an environment that is more conducive to deliberative stance. This new typology highlights factors that lead to preference petrification and allows for the appreciation of the non-decisional character of micro-deliberation. All of it leads to the conclusion that, in order to preserve their deliberative character in the systemic context, deliberative minipublics should not always be required to have decision-making powers
Źródło:
Avant; 2019, 10, 1; 89-117
2082-6710
Pojawia się w:
Avant
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Socrates and Deliberative Democracy. On Socrates’ Conception of Politics in Plato’s Apology, Crito and Gorgias
Socrates and Deliberative Democracy. On Socrates’ Conception of Politics in Plato’s Apology, Crito and Gorgias
Sokrates und die deliberative Demokratie. Zum sokratischen Politikverständnis in Platons Apologie, Kriton und Gorgias
Autorzy:
Jedan, Christoph
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633565.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
deliberative democracy
politics
religion
Socrates
Plato
Opis:
Die Figur des Sokrates, die uns in den frühen platonischen Dialogen entgegentritt, wird für eine Vielzahl heutiger politischer Theorien als Ahnherr reklamiert. Das Problem bei solchen Vereinnahmungsversuchen ist, dass sie den Blick auf das Sperrige, historisch Besondere und gar nicht zu unseren Erwartungen Passende des sokratischen Denkens verstellen. In diesem Artikel wende ich mich exemplarisch einer solchen Vereinnahmung von Sokrates für heutige politische Theorien zu, nämlich Versuchen, Sokrates zum Ahnherrn heutiger “deliberativer” Demokratiekonzeptionen zu erklären. Ich werde mithilfe einer stark kontextualisierenden Interpretation von drei frühen Platondialogen - der Apologie, dem Kriton und dem Gorgias - zeigen, dass solche Vereinnahmungsversuche den spezifischen religiösen Charakter von Sokrates’ “Berufung” aus dem Auge verlieren. Es ist diese religiöse Berufung, die Sokrates davon abhält, sich in einer für den athenischen “Mainstream” akzeptablen Weise in politische Diskurse einzubringen. Es wäre allerdings auch verkehrt, Sokrates zu einem im Grunde unpolitischen Denker zu erklären.1 Ich werde zeigen, dass Sokrates’ Haltung durchaus politisch zu verstehen ist. Sie repräsentiert eine Strömung im antiken griechischen politischen Denken, die der Perfektion der persönlichen ethischen Haltung einen absoluten Primat einräumt. Dabei gehe ich wie folgt vor: Im ersten Abschnitt zeige ich kurz, auf welche Weise Sokrates für verschiedene deliberative Demokratiekonzeptionen vereinnahmt worden ist. Im zweiten Abschnitt biete ich eine Interpretation der Apologie, des Kriton und des Gorgias. Im dritten Abschnitt analysiere ich zusammenfassend das sokratische Politikverständnis.
The position of Socrates in Plato’s earlier dialogues is often seen as an anticipation of contemporary political theories. This article takes issue with the claim that Socrates anticipated modern theories of deliberative democracy. It examines three early Platonic dialogues (the Apology, the Crito and the Gorgias) and argues that the Socrates presented in the dialogues is actually far more dogmatic in ethical as well as religious matters than such annexations of Socrates can acknowledge. Furthermore, Socrates does not develop a theory that would support Athenian democracy. Although politically inactive within the Athenian political framework, Socrates is nonetheless depicted in the Gorgias as formulating an “ethical” view of politics. According to this conception, true politics is always virtue‑ oriented. It is a matter of improving the characters of one’s fellow citizens, and is detached from the question of how political power should be distributed. Socrates’ political outlook is echoed in several Hellenistic philosophical schools, the Stoics in particular.
The position of Socrates in Plato’s earlier dialogues is often seen as an anticipation of contemporary political theories. This article takes issue with the claim that Socrates anticipated modern theories of deliberative democracy. It examines three early Platonic dialogues (the Apology, the Crito and the Gorgias) and argues that the Socrates presented in the dialogues is actually far more dogmatic in ethical as well as religious matters than such annexations of Socrates can acknowledge. Furthermore, Socrates does not develop a theory that would support Athenian democracy. Although politically inactive within the Athenian political framework, Socrates is nonetheless depicted in the Gorgias as formulating an “ethical” view of politics. According to this conception, true politics is always virtue‑oriented. It is a matter of improving the characters of one’s fellow citizens, and is detached from the question of how political power should be distributed. Socrates’ political outlook is echoed in several Hellenistic philosophical schools, the Stoics in particular.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2010, 1, 1; 31-44
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Vox Populi or abdication of responsibility?: The influence of the Irish Citizens’ Assembly on the public discourse regarding abortion, 2016-2019
Autorzy:
McNamara, Paul
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1920308.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
Tematy:
Ireland
abortion, citizens’ assemblies
deliberative democracy
Opis:
The last four decades have witnessed enormous changes in the Republic of Ireland in terms of society, economy and politics. Formerly perceived as a poor, peripheral and “priest-ridden” country additionally plagued by political violence in Northern Ireland, over recent decades Irish voters have supported a series of “liberal causes”. Indeed, nowhere is this more apparent than Ireland’s laws concerning abortion, an issue which displayed a seismic shift not only among Irish voters but the political parties which claim to represent them, a shift clearly reflected in the public discourse. At the same time, it will be seen that the use of a Citizens’ Assembly as an exercise in “deliberative democracy” has allowed mainstream political parties to pass responsibility, at least partially, for changes to controversial laws to an extra-parliamentary body, thereby allowing them to claim that they were following the will of “the people” and finally settle one of the longest running conflicts in Irish political life. Thus, this article seeks to examine and describe both how effective the Irish Citizens’ Assembly was at achieving its stated goal and its influence on the nation’s public discourse concerning the issue of abortion.
Źródło:
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies; 2019, 2; 131-156
2299-4335
Pojawia się w:
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola komunikacji społecznej w rozwoju demokracji. Cz. 1, Uwagi o demokracji (deliberatywnej/partycypacyjnej)
The role of social communication in the development of democracy. Pt. 1, Remarks on (deliberative/participative) democracy
Autorzy:
Przybylska-Czajkowska, B.
Czajkowski, W.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/324496.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Politechnika Śląska. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
Tematy:
demokracja
demokracja partycypacyjna
demokracja deliberatywna
democracy
participative democracy
deliberative democracy
Opis:
Artykuł ten stanowi pierwszą cześć eseju poświęconego roli komunikacji społecznej w rozwoju demokracji. Poświęcony jest pojęciu demokracji oraz rozmaitym wartościom, które wiążą się z demokracją. Wartości te – zdaniem autorów – najpełniej realizują się w partycypacyjnej demokracji deliberatywnej.
The paper is the first part of essay devoted to the role social communication plays in the development of democracy. The paper is devoted to the notion of democracy and to various values related to democracy. According to the authors’ view these values are best actualized in participative deliberative democracy.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska; 2018, 123; 397-419
1641-3466
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sondaż deliberatywny – inwentarz problemów
Deliberative polling – a list of problems
Autorzy:
Kubiak, Anna
Krzewińska, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/413328.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
sondaż deliberatywny
demokracja deliberatywna
deliberacja
deliberative polling
deliberative democracy
deliberation
Opis:
W artykule prezentujemy sondaż deliberatywny® – metodę badania opinii, stworzoną i opatentowaną przez Jamesa S. Fishkina. W pierwszej części opisujemy poszczególne etapy prowadzenia tego typu badań oraz prezentujemy sondaż, zrealizowany w Poznaniu w 2009 r. (jedyny przeprowadzony w Polsce), który dotyczył poglądów mieszkańców miasta na temat zarządzania stadionem po Mistrzostwach Europy w Piłce Nożnej EURO 2012. W drugiej części artykułu przedstawiamy wielowątkową metodologiczną analizę tej metody badawczej, wskazując na problemy związane z realizacją takiego badania, a także podkreślając zalety tego przedsięwzięcia, do których zaliczamy przede wszystkim aktywizowanie obywateli i włączanie ich w proces podejmowania decyzji.
In this paper we presented deliberative polling® – the opinion research method created and patented by James S. Fishkin. In the first part of the article we focused on phases of conducting this type of research and presented the only one so far in Poland deliberative polling® which was organized in Poznań in 2009. The researchers were interested in the opinions of residents on the management of the stadium after EURO 2012. In the second part we analysed the research method from a variety of points of view, we highlighted some of the problems connected with organizing of this type of research, but we underline advantages of this research. The most important advantages included on: stimulating of citizens to act and contribute into the process of making decisions.
Źródło:
Przegląd Socjologiczny; 2012, 61, 1; 9 - 30
0033-2356
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Demeny Voting in Poland: Introduction to a Research Concept
Autorzy:
Szczepański, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/531223.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Fundacja Instytut Nauki o Polityce
Tematy:
demeny voting
Polska
political theory
deliberative democracy
Opis:
Demeny voting is one of less known ways to modify the classic approach to organizing democratic elections. This paper is an attempt at identifying a proper approach to studies on the possible impact of the demeny voting system on the Polish political system. Moreover, it is devoted to identifying other fields that require further research which should precede proper investigation of possible application of demeny voting in Poland. Secondary interest of the article is to pursue the connection between demeny voting and the ideal of deliberative democracy. The author refers to the results of the 2015 general elections and Polish demographic information published by the Central Statistical Office of Poland. The analysis of the data may serve as of a first step towards determining a hypothetical impact of demeny voting on the Polish political system
Źródło:
Polish Journal of Political Science; 2017, 3, 2; 25-37
2391-3991
Pojawia się w:
Polish Journal of Political Science
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
OBLIGATORY COMMISSIONS AND CONSULTATIVE BODIES IN LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF TERRITORIAL SELF-GOVERNMENT UNITS IN POLAND AND TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES IN FRANCE – DIRECTIONS OF CHANGES
Autorzy:
Augustyniak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/915899.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
consultative administration
obligatory commissions
consultative dialogue
deliberative democracy
Opis:
The value of consultative democracy can not be overestimated, especially considering the local and supra-local administration gradually bringing the resident closer to self-government communities. Therefore, this issue is important and still requires improvement in the area of mutual relations between self-government authorities and residents of communes, districts/departments, voivodeships/regions. The search for common relations in participating in the management of the self-government community is a current challenge facing the territorial self-government in both legal orders. The comparative perspective in the scope of the functioning of commissions and consultative bodies of an obligatory nature is aimed at getting acquainted with the consultative administration in the territorial self-government in both legal orders and proposing directions of changes to Polish legal regulations in this area to improve the consultative dialogue and its normative tools.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2018, 32, 1; 95-113
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Forum Debaty Publicznej
Forum for Public Debate
Autorzy:
Kozioł, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/489640.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Forum for Public Debate
deliberation
deliberative democracy
public participation
Opis:
A crisis of contemporary democracy, long proclaimed by political analysts, and the growing discontent with its practice have given a stimulus for various remedial actions. One of these actions is the idea of deliberative democracy. Deliberative democracy is not only a multi-facet theoretical project (outlined briefly in the present article) but also a practice of promoting community participation and of introducing various, even non-standard, methods of participation. Such was the idea behind a presidential initiative in 2010 for setting up a platform for public discussion, Forum for Public Debate. The aims and objectives of the platform, its focus, underlying principles, as well as procedures in place and the results of what has been undertaken within its framework – they all show that the initiative is a clear manifestation of what is called deliberative democracy.
Źródło:
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica; 2014, 13; 201-219
2081-3333
Pojawia się w:
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Budżet obywatelski w jednostkach samorządu terytorialnego jako specyficzny rodzaj referendum lokalnego
Civic budget in local government units as a specific type of local referendum
Autorzy:
Jaśkowiec, Dominik
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/30098295.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
deliberative democracy
local government
local referendum
participatory budget
social participation
Opis:
Niniejsze opracowanie stanowi próbę odpowiedzi na pytanie o charakter, pozycję i znaczenie procedury budżetu obywatelskiego w kontekście zasad określających ustrój jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce. Czy procedura budżetu obywatelskiego stanowi szczególny rodzaj konsultacji społecznych, czy też powinna zostać ujęta, jako specyficzny rodzaj referendom lokalnego, w przepisach odnoszących się bezpośrednio do tej formy demokracji bezpośredniej? Konkluzją opracowania jest stwierdzenie, że budżet obywatelski, który wykazuje cechy rozstrzygnięć o charakterze referendalnym, powinien znaleźć się docelowo w katalogu narzędzi przewidzianych Ustawą o referendum lokalnym oczywiście przy uwzględnieniu jego specyficznego charakteru. Za takim umiejscowieniem budżetu obywatelskiego przemawia przede wszystkim wiążący dla jednostek samorządu terytorialnego rezultat głosowania mieszkańców.
This study is an attempt to answer the question about the character and position and the importance of the civic budget procedure in the context of the principles defining the system of local government units in Poland. Is the civic budget procedure a special kind of public consultation or should it be included, as a specific kind of local referenda, in the regulations relating directly to this form of direct democracy? The conclusion of the study is that the civic budget, which shows the features of referendum decisions, should ultimately bein the catalog of tools provided for in the Local Referendum Act - of course taking into account its specific nature. This placement of the civic budget is supported primarily by the result of voting by the inhabitants, binding on local government units.
Źródło:
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica; 2021, 26, 336; 141-149
2081-3333
Pojawia się w:
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selected Issues Regarding the Normative Regulation of the Citizens’ Panel in Poland
Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące normatywnych regulacji panelu obywatelskiego w Polsce
Autorzy:
Glejt-Uziębło, Paulina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/941000.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
citizens’ panel
public participation
deliberative democracy
panel obywatelski
partycypacja społeczna
demokracja deliberatywna
Opis:
The citizens’ panel is one of the instruments of deliberative democracy, which has been recently implemented in Poland. Its essence is manifested in the creation of a representative group of residents, which, after acquiring knowledge on a given topic, prepare recommendations constituting a solution to a given problem. The current legal solutions concerning the citizens’ panel in Poland are primarily governed by local law. They vary not only in content, but also in legal forms, initiators, methods of appointing experts and even the very concept of the “citizens’ panel”. This article attempts to show these differences in current Polish regulations. The considerations on the citizens’ panel are followed by conclusions de lege ferenda which aim to improve the current legislative solutions.
Panel obywatelski jest jednym z instrumentów demokracji deliberatywnej, który od niedawna jest wykorzystywany w Polsce. Jego istota przejawia się w utworzeniu reprezentatywnej grupy mieszkańców, która po pozyskaniu wiedzy na dany temat, stworzyłaby rekomendacje stanowiące rozwiązanie określonego problemu. Obecne rozwiązania prawne polskiego panelu obywatelskiego występują są przede wszystkim regulowane aktami prawa miejscowego. Są one zróżnicowane nie tylko co do treści, ale również form prawnych, podmiotów inicjujących, sposobu powoływania ekspertów, a nawet samego pojęcia „panelu obywatelskiego”. W niniejszym opracowaniu podjęto próbę ukazania tych różnić w dotychczasowych polskich regulacjach. Przedstawiono także wnioski de lege ferenda, mające na celu ulepszenie legislacyjnych rozwiązań.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2019, 6 (52); 367-383
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
U.S. Supreme Court in the civil rights era: Deliberative Democracy and its educative institutional role, 1950s–1970s
Autorzy:
Figueroa, Carlos
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/652827.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
educative court
deliberative democracy
judicial review
U.S. Supreme Court
ethical responsibility
Opis:
This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s lesser-known educative role as an egalitarian institution within a broader deliberative democratic process. Scholars have argued that the Court’s long asserted power of judicial review, especially in the equal protection and civil rights context, has been an over-reach of the judicial branch’s constitutional authority and responsibilities. Normative and empirical critiques have been centered on the aims of judicial review, and the challenges it poses in American political life. A core issue surrounding these critiques is that Justices are appointed not elected, and thus undermine the principle of majority rule in the U.S. constitutional democratic order. Although these critiques are legitimate in terms of claims about unelected Supreme Court Justices’ seemingly discretionary powers over elected legislative bodies, and the uncertain policy implications of judicial pronouncements on the broader society, there is, nevertheless, a positive application of judicial review as a tool Justices use as part of their educative role overcoming the so-called “counter-majoritarian difficulty.” Through a close reading of oral arguments in Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) and San Antonio vs. Rodriguez (1973)-two landmark cases invoking the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the federal Constitution-the article shows how appointed Justices adjudicate individual cases on appeal and attempt to educate (through an argumentative, reason-based and question-centered process) citizenlitigants and their legal representatives about the importance of equality, fairness and ethical responsibility even prior to rendering final decisions on policy controversies that have broader national social, political and economic implications.
Źródło:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym; 2018, 21, 4; 59-88
1899-2226
2353-4869
Pojawia się w:
Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kryzys debaty publicznej na przykładzie debaty bioetycznej
Autorzy:
Dudkiewicz, Ignacy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2011091.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Ośrodek Badawczy Facta Ficta
Tematy:
bioethical debate
public debate
public sphere
pluralism
deliberative democracy
democratic rule of law
Opis:
Both in scientific literature and journalism, there is the thesis about the low quality of the Polish bioethical debate. In support of this statement, the form of media and political discussions on the subject of the conscience clause, specific borderline situations (eg in the cases of Alfie Evans, "Pole from Plymouth") or the legal regulation of termination of pregnancy are cited. Ignacy Dudkiewicz in the chapter The crisis of public debate on the example of bioethical debate attempts to organize the diagnosis of the state of Polish bioethical debate and reflects on further methods of its research and the relationship between the state of bioethical debate and public debate in general. He argues that the understanding of the problems related to the quality of the Polish bioethical debate can help for a better understanding also of the problems relating to the public debate in general, and that an appropriate field for further scientific considerations on increasing the quality of both, may be the concept of deliberative democracy. The chapter includes, firstly, a justification why reflection on the quality of the bioethical debate is needed – due to its semi-nature, the importance of the issues it concerns and the prevalence of the discussion. Secondly, identifying the specificity of the bioethical debate in relation to the public debate in general. Thirdly, an outline of a critical diagnosis of the state of bioethical discussion on the basis of the available literature along with the justification and indication of its numerous weaknesses – both those specific to the bioethical debate and those of a general nature concerning the entire public debate. Fourthly and finally: proposals for further research activities – making an in-depth diagnosis on the example of the discussion on the conscience clause and reflection on whether a deliberative democracy could create conditions for increasing the quality of the bioethical debate, and thus also for enacting better law in bioethical matters, taking into account the worldview differentiation of a democratic society and the rule of law.
Źródło:
Facta Ficta. Journal of Theory, Narrative & Media; 2021, 7, 1; 227-241
2719-8278
Pojawia się w:
Facta Ficta. Journal of Theory, Narrative & Media
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 35

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies