Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "literature of Modernism" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The Cads of Young Poland according to Julian Przyboś: echoes of the early modernist apocalyptic tone
Młodopolskie chamuły według Juliana Przybosia – o apokaliptycznej tonacji przyjętej z wczesnego modernizmu
Autorzy:
Misiak, Iwona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087995.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the early 20th century
Young Poland
Modernism
literary dialogue
Quarrel between the Moderns and the Ancients
spoof
manifesto
plasticity
Julian Przyboś (1901–1970)
Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)
Catherine Malabou (b. 1959)
pamfletowy manifest
apokalipsa
plastyczność
awangarda i ariegarda
Opis:
This article presents a new reading of the spoof poetic manifesto ‘Chamuły poezji’ [‘The Cads of Poetry’] written by Julian Przyboś in 1926. His use of the apocalyptic tones of early modernist poetry to lampoon a trio of acclaimed poets associated with Young Poland (especially Jan Kasprowicz) suggests a complex nature of Przyboś’s rejection and dependence on that movement. In general, the influence of Young Poland, though quite conspicuous in is juvenilia and early publications, tends to fade away. ‘Chamuły’ is a pejorative nonce word which alludes to the Biblical Ham as well as a Polish word for a cad or ill-bred bumpkin. This article adds to it another layer of meaning, based on Derrida’s interpretation of the Apocalypse, with allusions to sexual and genital imagery. And more generally, it reframes the whole Przyboś’s poetic work (not just his early poems) using Catherine Malabou’s concept of plasticity. Seen in a broader historical perspective, Przyboś’s struggles to break with Young Poland are not unlike the predicament of many eighteenth-century writers caught in the dispute between the Moderns and the Ancients, satirized in Swift’s Battle of the Books. The overall conclusion of this study is that at all times the avant-garde and the arrière-garde remain in a continuous dialogue and the innovators never lose sight of those left behind. Poetry is, after all, metamorphic and cannot be contained within within the bounds of manifestoes and artistic programmes.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 48-68
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Yeży Yankowski vs. Jankowski: a breakup with young Poland and with himself (act I)
Yeży Yankowski kontra Jerzy Jankowski. Akt zerwania z Młodą Polską i samym sobą (pierwsza odsłona)
Autorzy:
Okulicz-Kozaryn, Radosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087964.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the early 20th century
Young Poland
Modernism
Futurism
Jerzy Jankowski (1887–1941)
Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)
Tadeusz Miciński (1873– 1918)
Leon Choromański (1873–1952)
Zygmunt Kisielewski (1882–1942)
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti (1876–1944)
Jerzy Jankowski
futuryzm
modernizm
Młoda Polska
krytyka młodopolska
Tadeusz Miciński
Leon Choromański
Zygmunt Kisielewski
witalizm
urbanizm
Opis:
This article deals with the first phase of Jerzy Jankowski’s severing ties with the Young Poland movement and his access to the futurist avant-garde. His conversion to the new poetic worldview, which he pioneered in Poland, was reflected in his articles and poems published in Widnokrąg [Horizon], a magazine he founded in 1913 to replace Tydzień [The Week], of which he was the main publisher. The rebranding came on top of disagreements between the magazine’s contributors. The divergent views focused on the assessment of Tadeusz Miciński’s novel Xiądz Faust. In May 1913, in his former magazine, Jankowski heaped praises on it. However, the following year, when it came up for debate in the Widnokrąg between Miciński’s aficionado Zygmunt Kisielewski and the skeptically-minded Leon Choromański, Jankowski sought to distance himself from both the emotionalism and the intellectualism of his colleagues. By that time he was absolutely adamant that the antinomies of Young Poland’s high art were a trap. Now that the worship of art striving for timeless perfection would have to give way to an unpretentious concern for ‘fugitive art’, the time was ripe for working out a new aesthetic, centered on the thrilling ‘beauty of big cities’, cabaret, cinema, and modern machines. Jankowski broke with his erstwhile mentor Ferdynand Ruszczyc and Zenon Przesmycki-Miriam, to follow the incomparably more exciting Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. Meanwhile, Choromański made one last attempt to bring the young man back on track by writing an article, in which he argued that Futurism was crude, and shallow, a throwback rather than a modern breakthrough. However, his warnings made no dint in Jankowski’s faith in futurism. For him its triumph was a matter of historical necessity. And, he had already thrown in his lot with the new movement by publishing his first futurist poems, ‘Spłon lotnika’ [‘Pilot in flames’] and ‘Maggi’.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 33-46
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies