Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "duc." wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Konserwacja kościoła de Fontaines w Neuchâtel
    RESTORATION OF DE FONTAINES CHURCH AT NEUCHÂTEL, SWITZERLAND
    Autorzy:
    Łysiak, Waldemar
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536139.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1972
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    kościół de Fontaines w Neuchâtel
    Neuchatel w Szwajcarii
    Camillo Boito
    idea Viollet-le-Duca
    Viollet-le-Duc
    duch zabytku
    Opis:
    Basing on example of a small de Fontaines church at Neuchâtel, Switzerland the author deals With an essential problem of adaptative restoration works being undertaken in architectural objects of historical character. Though the building in question, when considered from the viewpoint of history of art, cannot be classified as one belonging to the top category the restoration works carried out gave rise to a great deal of interesting discussion. The problems involved in restoration of th a t church were presented in the summer of 1971 at the International Centre for the Study of Preservation and the Restoration of Cultural Property, Rome, th a t has been established under the auspices of UNESCO, as a specific fea ture in certain modern tendencies present in the conservator’s work. During th e course of restoration in 1969 from the church interior were removed its neo-Gothic fittings made of wood, except for pulpit, whose place took a number of wood furnishings extremely simple in their shapes. In this strive to achieve an intended simplicity and the most functional character of the church’s interior the conservators have, however, advanced too far, as the new fittings are quite drastically modern as to their forms and worse still in sharp contrast to architecture. In this connection the fact th a t from among elements of the former fittings the pulpit has been left as the only element seems to be a misunderstanding or even failure. The author emphasizes th a t it is not the change of fittings alone with which he is dealing in his article but the so-called spirit of the monument meant as the character and climate of authenticity. The excessively modernized interior of de Fontaines church has become one sterile and deprived of colour thus loosing its intrinsic climate and character.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1972, 1; 27-31
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O polskiej szkole odbudowy i konserwacji zabytków
    ON THE POLISH SCHOOL OF THE CONSERVATION AND OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
    Autorzy:
    Zachwatowicz, Jan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538808.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1981
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    polska szkoła odbudowy i konserwacji zabytków
    ochrona dóbr kultury w Polsce
    przykłady zniszczeń i deprecjacji zabytków kultury polskiej
    Viollet-le-Duc
    konserwacja zabytków w krajach Europy
    Alois Riegl
    teoria Riegla
    zasada „konserwować - nie restaurować”
    Alfred Lauterbach
    Opis:
    The author considers a substantiation of the term „Polish conservation school” and describes stages of the development of the concept of conservation in Poland from the 18th century. He gives examples o f intentional damages and depreciation o f Polish historic monuments during annexations and also o f initiatives taken by conservators and historians. At that time one could see various trends to emerge in conservation methods displaying features of school, to mention only Viollet-le-Duc in France and A. Riegel in Austria. The methods met also a vivid response in Poland, which can be seen in the reconstruction o f the cathedral at Włocławek and of the Cloth Hall in Cracow. Of particular importance were the ideas o f A. Riegel, who showed moderation and tried to find compromise solutions. Such a rational restraint in establishing the direction of monuments conservation adjusted to the conditions and fate of historic monuments in Poland displayed, already at that time, features o f the Polish school favouring, first and foremost, care for a proper form and durability o f monuments o f the national culture and not ambitions o f architectural creativity. In 1918, after the regaining o f independence by Poland conservation services were established and the law on the protection of monuments was enforced in 1928. The definition o f a monument covered all kinds o f human activity and was not time-restricted. It was also then that works on the rebuilding o f monuments destroyed during the war were undertaken, with the main emphasis put to restore the splendour o f royal castles in Warsaw and in Cracow. The operative principle was „to preserve and not to restore” , although the majority o f European projects consisted in restoration. The Conservation Congress in Athens (1931) recommended to avoid the reproduction of destroyed monuments but it did not repudiate the process totally in view o f some inevitable events. The period of People’s Poland II came to an end in 1938 with the statement made by A. Lauterbach, a Polish art historian, who said that the fate o f Polish monuments during the war of 1914—1918 made it impossible to apply the principle „to preserve and not to restore” in its pure form and that restoration and even reproduction o f monuments was a must. After the World War II this statement assumed the form of a concrete work programme (the execution o f old town complexes in, i.a., Warsaw, Gdańsk, Poznań). In the opinion of renowned historians o f architecture (R. Pane) and theoreticians of conservation (W. Frodl) the rebuilding o f monuments in Poland after 1945 was an exceptional and political task. According to the author o f this article, because o f its exceptionality and particular conditions in which monuments were rebuilt, one can hardly talk about „the Polish school o f conservation” , as this is not a doctrine but an exception. A similar method was also used by the French to reconstruct the destroyed town o f Saint Malo. Polish monuments conservation boasts a long tradition of great efforts put into their protection, restoration and reconstruction. One could mention at this point (1) comprehensive studies accompanied by broad inventory works and monographic elaborations, (2) training o f personnel in various fields o f monuments conservation, (3) works on the revival of historic town centres, (4) the establishment in 1950 of the State Enterprise for Conservation of Art, and (5) permanent and active participation o f Polish representatives in international works (e.g. in ICOMOS). The author concludes that each school is linked with a definite philosophical doctrine which the Poles have not created but only applied the methods o f monuments conservation necessary in a given situation.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1981, 1-2; 4-10
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies